KZ PR3 VS KZ PR1 Pro

IEM Comparison: Expert & Community Scores Side-by-Side

Home Ranking Compare IEMs

KZ PR3 and KZ PR1 Pro are in-ear monitors. KZ PR3 costs $49 while KZ PR1 Pro costs $80. KZ PR1 Pro is $31 more expensive. KZ PR1 Pro holds a decisive 1.4-point edge in reviewer scores (3.3 vs 4.7). KZ PR1 Pro carries a user score of 7.5. KZ PR1 Pro has significantly better treble with a 3-point edge and KZ PR1 Pro has significantly better dynamics with a 5-point edge.

Insights

Metric KZ PR3 KZ PR1 Pro
Bass 3.3 5
Mids 5 5
Treble 1 4
Details 3.3 5
Soundstage 5 4.7
Imaging 3.3 6
Dynamics 1 6
Tonality 3.3 4.7
Technicalities 1 5.7

KZ PR3 Aggregated Review Score

Average Reviewer Scores

Jaytiss

Average Reviewer Score:

3.3

Very Poor


KZ PR1 Pro Aggregated Review Score

Average Reviewer Scores

Super* Review
Precogvision Z-Reviews

Average Reviewer Score:

4.7

Generally Unfavorable


Reviews Comparison

KZ PR3 (more reviews)

KZ PR3 reviewed by Jaytiss

Jaytiss 3.3 Reviewer Score
D Tuning
E- Tech
It isn't bad, just not fantastic. I enjoy the fit, might do a full review.

Jaytiss original ranking

Jaytiss Youtube Channel
Mids: C+ Treble: E- Dynamics: E- Soundstage: C+

KZ PR1 Pro (more reviews)

KZ PR1 Pro reviewed by Precogvision

Precogvision 5.1 Reviewer Score
C Tuning
B- Tech
Solid choice at $50 for an exciting, high-clarity sound, but at the expense of an artifical brightness and timbre.

Precogvision original ranking

Precogvision Youtube Channel
Bass: C+ Mids: C+ Treble: C- Dynamics: B Details: C+ Imaging: B

KZ PR1 Pro reviewed by Z-Reviews

Z-Reviews 5 * score rescaled + normalized

KZ PR1 Pro reviewed by Super* Review

Super* Review 4* * score rescaled + normalized

KZ PR3 User Review Score

Average User Scores

Average User Score: n/a

Based on 0 user reviews

No user reviews yet. Be the first one who writes a review!

KZ PR1 Pro User Review Score

Average User Scores

Average User Score:

Based on 1 user reviews

7.5

Strongly Favorable

KZ PR3 Gaming Score

Gaming Score & Grade

  • The gaming score is prioritizing technical capabilities of the IEM (Separation, Layering, Soundstage) and good value.

Gaming Score

1.7

Gaming Grade

E

KZ PR1 Pro Gaming Score

Gaming Score & Grade

  • The gaming score is prioritizing technical capabilities of the IEM (Separation, Layering, Soundstage) and good value.

Gaming Score

5.4

Gaming Grade

C+

KZ PR3 Scorings

Average Technical & Tuning Grades

Average Tunign Grade

D
  • Expect a patchy tonal profile that makes instrumentation feel mismatched. EQ is almost mandatory to tame the response.

Average Technical Grade

E-
  • The presentation is claustrophobic and blurred, leaving simple arrangements sounding chaotic and lifeless. The presentation feels more like background noise than music.
Mids C+
Midrange performance is decent, offering balanced presence without major flaws. It works well for casual background listening.
Treble E-
Highs sound veiled and distant, draining life from the mix. Hi-hats fade before they start.
Dynamics E-
It cannot muster meaningful volume gradation, making tracks feel static. It drains life from energetic music.
Soundstage C+
The image breathes a little, spacing instruments laterally while sketching a light sense of distance. Separation improves with cleaner recordings.
Gaming E
Compromised imaging significantly impacts gameplay awareness. Directional cues often lack accuracy or consistency.

KZ PR1 Pro Scorings

Average Technical & Tuning Grades

Average Tunign Grade

C
  • Expect a patchy tonal profile that makes instrumentation feel mismatched. EQ is almost mandatory to tame the response.

Average Technical Grade

B-
  • An honest, middle-of-the-road performance preserves structure without chasing micro-detail. It's respectable for everyday listening sessions.
Bass C+
Expect a balanced but ordinary low end that avoids both extremes. Slam remains moderate and controlled.
Mids C+
Midrange performance is decent, offering balanced presence without major flaws. It works well for casual background listening.
Treble C-
The top end sounds acceptable but lacks the smoothness of higher tiers. Air is hinted at more than delivered.
Dynamics B
Dynamic expression is good, delivering solid impact and convincing contrast. Percussion lands with convincing weight.
Details C+
Plenty of nuance surfaces, just not the last layer of shimmer. It balances clarity with an easygoing tone.
Imaging B
Layered vocals and harmonies remain distinct and easy to track. Layered vocals remain easy to track.
Gaming C+
Fundamental left/right positioning with limited depth perception. Works for non-competitive gaming but lacks precision.

KZ PR3 User Reviews

Example User Posted on ...
0.0

"This is an example review"

Pros
  • Example pro 1
  • Example pro 2
Cons
  • Example con 1
  • Example con 2
No User-Reviews Yet

Share your experience and build your personal ranking list.

You need to be signed in to write your own review

KZ PR1 Pro User Reviews

Share your experience and build your personal ranking list.

You need to be signed in to write your own review
yorxx
7.5

Balanced V-shaped tuning.

Tuning: B Tech: A+ Bass: A- Mids: B Treble: B Dynamics: B Soundstage: A+ Details: B Imaging: A+
Pros
Very good technically, Very good soundstage, warm, very good image.
Cons
No.

Find your next IEM:

IEM Finder Quiz

new
Use this quiz and answer a few questions to get your individual IEM recommendation list
(1/2) How much are you willing to spend on the IEM?
(2/2) Which sound characteristics are particularly important to you?

Footer