KZ PR3 VS Tin Hifi C3

IEM Comparison: Expert & Community Scores Side-by-Side

Home Ranking Compare IEMs

KZ PR3 and Tin Hifi C3 are in-ear monitors. KZ PR3 costs $49 while Tin Hifi C3 costs $50. Tin Hifi C3 is $1 more expensive. Tin Hifi C3 holds a decisive 3.7-point edge in reviewer scores (2.8 vs 6.5).

Insights

Metric KZ PR3 Tin Hifi C3
Mids 5 6.5
Treble 1 6.5
Soundstage 4 6.5
Dynamics 1 6.5
Tonality 2.8 6.5
Technicalities 1 6.5
Take these comparisons with a grain of salt—we don't have enough KZ PR3 and Tin Hifi C3 reviews saved yet to provide an unbiased result.

KZ PR3 Aggregated Review Score

Average Reviewer Scores

Average Reviewer Score:

2.8

Very Negative


Tin Hifi C3 Aggregated Review Score

Average Reviewer Scores

Average Reviewer Score:

6.5

Cautiously Favorable


Reviews Comparison

KZ PR3 (more reviews)

KZ PR3 reviewed by Jaytiss

Jaytiss 2.8 Reviewer Score
D- Tuning
E- Tech
It isn't bad, just not fantastic. I enjoy the fit, might do a full review.

Jaytiss original ranking

Jaytiss Youtube Channel
Mids: C+ Treble: E- Dynamics: E- Soundstage: C-

KZ PR3 User Review Score

Average User Scores

Average User Score: n/a

Based on 0 user reviews

No user reviews yet. Be the first one who writes a review!

Tin Hifi C3 User Review Score

Average User Scores

Average User Score: n/a

Based on 0 user reviews

No user reviews yet. Be the first one who writes a review!

KZ PR3 Gaming Score

Gaming Score & Grade

  • The gaming score is prioritizing technical capabilities of the IEM (Separation, Layering, Soundstage) and good value.

Gaming Score

1.5

Gaming Grade

E

Tin Hifi C3 Gaming Score

Gaming Score & Grade

  • The gaming score is prioritizing technical capabilities of the IEM (Separation, Layering, Soundstage) and good value.

Gaming Score

6.5

Gaming Grade

B+

KZ PR3 Scorings

Average Technical & Tuning Grades

Average Tunign Grade

D-
  • The tonal profile is unruly and tiring, forcing constant volume adjustments. Even spoken word sounds unnatural.

Average Technical Grade

E-
  • The presentation is claustrophobic and blurred, leaving simple arrangements sounding chaotic and lifeless. The presentation feels more like background noise than music.
Mids C+
Midrange performance is decent, offering balanced presence without major flaws. It works well for casual background listening.
Treble E-
Highs sound veiled and distant, draining life from the mix. Hi-hats fade before they start.
Dynamics E-
It cannot muster meaningful volume gradation, making tracks feel static. It drains life from energetic music.
Soundstage C-
The mix opens sideways while remaining vertically compressed and front-to-back shallow. You'll notice crowding on busy tracks.
Gaming E
Compromised imaging significantly impacts gameplay awareness. Directional cues often lack accuracy or consistency.

Tin Hifi C3 Scorings

KZ PR3 User Reviews

Example User Posted on ...
0.0

"This is an example review"

Pros
  • Example pro 1
  • Example pro 2
Cons
  • Example con 1
  • Example con 2
No User-Reviews Yet

Share your experience and build your personal ranking list.

You need to be signed in to write your own review

Tin Hifi C3 User Reviews

Example User Posted on ...
0.0

"This is an example review"

Pros
  • Example pro 1
  • Example pro 2
Cons
  • Example con 1
  • Example con 2
No User-Reviews Yet

Share your experience and build your personal ranking list.

You need to be signed in to write your own review

Find your next IEM:

IEM Finder Quiz

new
Use this quiz and answer a few questions to get your individual IEM recommendation list
(1/3) How much are you willing to spend on the IEM?
(2/3) Which sound characteristics are particularly important to you?
(3/3) Which tuning do you prefer?
You can select multiple options.
Buy

Footer