Softears Studio 4 VS Mangird Xenns Top

IEM Comparison: Expert & Community Scores Side-by-Side

Home Ranking Compare IEMs

Softears Studio 4 and Mangird Xenns Top use 4BA and 1DD+8BA driver setups respectively. Softears Studio 4 costs $450 while Mangird Xenns Top costs $530. Mangird Xenns Top is $80 more expensive. Softears Studio 4 holds a slight 0.1-point edge in reviewer scores (7.5 vs 7.4). Mangird Xenns Top has better bass with a 0.5-point edge, Mangird Xenns Top has slightly better treble with a 0.3-point edge, Mangird Xenns Top has significantly better dynamics with a 1-point edge, Softears Studio 4 has better soundstage with a 0.5-point edge, Mangird Xenns Top has significantly better details with a 1.7-point edge and Mangird Xenns Top has significantly better imaging with a 1.8-point edge.

Insights

Metric Softears Studio 4 Mangird Xenns Top
Bass 6.5 7
Mids 7.3 7.2
Treble 7 7.3
Details 5 6.7
Soundstage 8 7.5
Imaging 5 6.8
Dynamics 5 6
Tonality 7.5 7.4
Technicalities 7.1 7.4

Softears Studio 4 Aggregated Review Score

Average Reviewer Scores

Average Reviewer Score:

7.5

Generally Favorable


Mangird Xenns Top Aggregated Review Score

Average Reviewer Scores

Average Reviewer Score:

7.4

Generally Favorable


Reviews Comparison

Softears Studio 4 reviewed by Super* Review

Super* Review 8* * score rescaled + normalized
Youtube Video Summary

Softears Studio 4 arrives as a 4×BA set at $450 with a surprisingly practical kit: a Pelican-style water-resistant case, cleaning brush, MoonDrop-style tips, and—occasionally—a 3.5 mm extension with a 6.3 mm adapter (availability seems inconsistent). The build is sleek piano-black with a light, no-nonsense cable that behaves well but omits a chin cinch. Medium, semi-custom shells fit flush and isolate strongly thanks to an unvented design; the smooth nozzle lacks a lip, so tip choice matters, and seal can break if pressed from certain angles.

Tuning targets a neutral presentation with a sub-bass lift and slightly lean lower mids—clean, lively, and a touch bright without straying into fatigue. Standout traits are the wide stereo image and pinpoint imaging that make mixes feel like they’re dancing around the head. Treble is smooth and extended (think S8-like refinement), while BA bass proves surprisingly sturdy. Drawbacks are modest: a bit of BA timbre, less micro-texture than class leaders, and lighter note weight. Against peers, Dunu SA6 offers warmer neutral tonality with superior texture; Kiwi Ears Orchestra Lite plays thicker and more relaxed but less separated; Symphonium Meteor swings warm and bassy with a larger headstage and snappy treble. Verdict: a 4/5 for those who crave energetic neutrality, top-tier separation, and a studio-clean vibe that still feels fun.


Super* Review original ranking

Super* Review Youtube Channel
Ad
Using this affiliate link for ordering your Softears Studio 4 or any other IEM helps fund our free service at no extra cost to you.

Price: $449

Buy Softears Studio 4 on HiFiGO

Mangird Xenns Top reviewed by Super* Review

Super* Review 8* * score rescaled + normalized

Softears Studio 4 reviewed by Tim Tuned

Tim Tuned 8 Reviewer Score
A+ Tuning
A+ Tech
Just great all around, balance with amazingly clean midrange

Tim Tuned original ranking

Tim Tuned Youtube Channel
Bass: A+ Mids: S Treble: S

Mangird Xenns Top reviewed by Tim Tuned

Tim Tuned 7.5 Reviewer Score
A Tuning
A+ Tech
Exceptionally tuned, full range and detailed Treble might be too much for some

Tim Tuned original ranking

Tim Tuned Youtube Channel
Bass: A+ Mids: A+ Treble: S

Softears Studio 4 reviewed by Jays Audio

Jays Audio 7.5 Reviewer Score
S- Tuning
A+ Tech
"Correct" and neutral tuning. Natural vocals, not as forward like RSV but zero faults. Slight Improvement over RSV in-terms of seapration and stage size/treble is same/not as warm.

Jays Audio original ranking

Jays Audio Youtube Channel

Mangird Xenns Top reviewed by Jays Audio

Jays Audio 7.5 Reviewer Score
A+ Tuning
A+ Tech
What the Variations should've been. Fantastic tehcnincalities. Neutral-bright leaning. Nothing wrong with it at mid-volume, but I can see treble can be too much at highet volumes.

Jays Audio original ranking

Jays Audio Youtube Channel

Softears Studio 4 reviewed by Precogvision

Precogvision 5 Reviewer Score
C+ Tuning
C+ Tech
Sounds plasticky and smoothed; inoffensive to the point of being offensive.

Precogvision original ranking

Precogvision Youtube Channel
Bass: C+ Mids: C+ Treble: C+ Dynamics: C+ Details: C+ Imaging: C+

Mangird Xenns Top reviewed by Precogvision

Precogvision 6.1 Reviewer Score
B Tuning
B Tech
Very inofffensive tonality with a soft treble response, sounds like lower and mid-treble are too recessed.

Precogvision original ranking

Precogvision Youtube Channel
Bass: B Mids: A- Treble: B Dynamics: B Details: B Imaging: B

Softears Studio 4 (more reviews)

Softears Studio 4 reviewed by Jaytiss

Jaytiss 8 Reviewer Score
A- Tuning
A- Tech
Something magical about this set, but it's not the Bass.
Youtube Video Summary

Starry Edition brings a fresh faceplate to the Softears Studio 4 without changing the tuning. The translucent, slightly large shell seals firmly and delivers strong isolation; the only nit is a modest nozzle lip that still holds tips fine. Packaging leans “studio”: compact Pelican-style case, extension cable, tips, 6.3 mm adapter, and a soft black cable that feels nice but lacks a chin slider and terminates in 3.5 mm.

Sonically, this 4BA set is about clarity, air, and top-end extension—described as among the best heard under $800. Vocals come through vivid, mids are clean, and bass has a mild shelf: tasteful impact without bloat, though it’s not a slam machine. Expect excellent imaging, space, and detail; a touch of EQ can add weight if desired. It can be a bit source-picky: low output impedance sources suit it best, while a 10 Ω adapter pushes more treble and trims bass in a less pleasing way.

Against peers, Studio 4 is praised over Softears Twilight for air/extension (while acknowledging Twilight’s smooth DD charm) and over Volume for overall technicalities despite the small price gap. Versus RSV, Studio 4 avoids the RSV’s slight bass “muffle” and undercuts it on price; compared with Monarch MKII, it delivers a similar tonal aim without the occasional grain. Sets like Kiwi Ears 4, Truthear Hexa, and Binary Acoustics D Quattro trade blows on bass quantity versus air, but Studio 4’s upper-air detail and coherence make it a standout. At an often-seen street of ~$368, it’s framed as a benchmark sub-$500 pick and earns a full recommendation for listeners chasing articulate treble, lifelike vocals, and refined balance.

Mids: A+ Treble: A- Dynamics: C+ Soundstage: A+

Jaytiss original ranking

Jaytiss Youtube Channel

Softears Studio 4 reviewed by Gizaudio Axel

Gizaudio Axel 8 Reviewer Score
S Tuning
A Tech
A benchmark for tonality and timbre. Neutral, accurate sound with great bass, tonal accuracy, forward vocals, and natural timbre. Excellent isolation. Unvented design and BA bass may not suit everyone.

Gizaudio Axel original ranking

Gizaudio Axel Youtube Channel

Softears Studio 4 reviewed by Head-Fi.org

Head-Fi.org 7.9 * score rescaled + normalized
15 community members have rated the Softears Studio 4 at an average of 4.6/5 on Head-Fi. Overall sentiment: Outstanding.

URL to full Review

Head-Fi.org original ranking

Mangird Xenns Top (more reviews)

Mangird Xenns Top reviewed by Kois Archive

Kois Archive 8 Reviewer Score
S Tuning
S Tech
Rating: S- | Value: ⭐ | Gaming: 🎮🎮🎮 | Comfort: 9 good bass and technicality for the price BA timbre, treble could be smoother

Kois Archive original ranking

Kois Archive Youtube Channel

Mangird Xenns Top reviewed by Bad Guy Good Audio

Bad Guy Good Audio 7.7 Reviewer Score
A- Tuning
A- Tech
check links for more info:

Bad Guy Good Audio original ranking

Bad Guy Good Audio Youtube Channel
Bass: A+ Mids: A- Treble: A-

Mangird Xenns Top reviewed by Fresh Reviews

Fresh Reviews 7.5* * The score of this reviewer influences only the Gaming Score
Youtube Video Summary

Mangird Xenns Top takes over the #1 slot for competitive gaming and music, edging out the Vulcan and Hook-X. Expect a massive, expansive stage, pinpoint imaging, and outstanding depth perception that translate cleanly from Apex to CS:GO and Valorant. Tonally it’s a breath of fresh air—airy treble, natural mids with lifelike vocals, and textured sub/mid-bass that stays energetic without smearing cues. Comfort is dialed: a well-shaped resin shell that disappears in long sessions, and aesthetics that look premium without being gaudy.

Among the rivals, Raptgo Hook-X brings the most atmospheric immersion and a fun, bass-elevated tilt—great for entertainment while keeping separation tidy—yet it’s not as resolving as Xenns Top. Dunu Vulcan keeps its place for chaotic Apex lobbies thanks to strong separation, though highs can verge on shouty. Budget picks still slap: Truthear Zero is the more analytical option with razor-sharp positional info, while Dunu Kima offers warm-neutral tuning and standout comfort. Differences in the top three are narrow, but Xenns Top’s blend of stage, imaging, and natural timbre makes it the set to beat for both sweaty matches and laid-back listening.


Fresh Reviews original ranking

Fresh Reviews Youtube Channel

Mangird Xenns Top reviewed by Audionotions

Audionotions 7.5 Reviewer Score
Variation's more fun, twin sibling. Similar technical capabilities to Vari - resolution, instrument separation and imaging are great. Thicker, meatier note weight than Variations and better vocal quality. Less shouty than Vari but also has a better treble extension. The Bass shelf is Harman-ish but with a delayed slope compared to the Variations, which not only helps with male vocals, kick drums, and bass guitars but also adds a lushness to the sound that the Vari was lacking. This sounds more alive than Variations! The one thing that is holding this set back is the slightly pillowy bass. Bass lacks a bit in tactility and punch.

Audionotions original ranking

Website (Audionotions)

Mangird Xenns Top reviewed by Shuwa-T

Shuwa-T 7.4 Reviewer Score
A- Tuning
A Tech
Comment: What Variations aspired to be. Layered bass slam, full midrange Lower treble gets a little hot, cymbal strikes too prominent

Shuwa-T original ranking

Shuwa-T Website

Bass: A- Mids: A- Treble: A Soundstage: A Details: A+ Imaging: A

Mangird Xenns Top reviewed by Nymz

Nymz 6.6 Reviewer Score
B+ Tuning
B Tech
Best Mangird has ever done - a slightly more fun Variations. Very clean and technical with a boomier bass. Lower mid-range is still somewhat dry.

Nymz original ranking

Nymz Website

Bass: B Mids: A- Treble: A- Details: B Imaging: A-

Softears Studio 4 User Review Score

Average User Scores

Average User Score: n/a

Based on 0 user reviews

No user reviews yet. Be the first one who writes a review!

Mangird Xenns Top User Review Score

Average User Scores

Average User Score: n/a

Based on 0 user reviews

No user reviews yet. Be the first one who writes a review!

Softears Studio 4 Gaming Score

Gaming Score & Grade

  • The gaming score is prioritizing technical capabilities of the IEM (Separation, Layering, Soundstage) and good value.

Gaming Score

7

Gaming Grade

A-

Mangird Xenns Top Gaming Score

Gaming Score & Grade

  • The gaming score is prioritizing technical capabilities of the IEM (Separation, Layering, Soundstage) and good value.

Gaming Score

7.9

Gaming Grade

A

Softears Studio 4 Scorings

Average Technical & Tuning Grades

Average Tunign Grade

A
  • Tuning feels well executed, keeping a natural flow across the spectrum. Switching genres feels seamless.

Average Technical Grade

A-
  • The presentation feels orderly, balancing workable detail retrieval with acceptable imaging cues. It keeps momentum without smearing transients.
Bass B+
Bass foundation is good, adding satisfying punch without losing control. Pop and rock tracks feel lively.
Mids A-
Expect lifelike vocals and instruments with impressive nuance and realism. You can easily follow harmonies and backups.
Treble A-
Expect effortless extension and clarity that keep the top end sparkling yet smooth. Layering in upper registers is impressive.
Dynamics C+
It offers fair punch and contrast, though micro-dynamics could be sharper. Impact is satisfying for day-to-day use.
Soundstage A+
Immersive holography surrounds the listener, making the venue feel tangible and enveloping. It delivers a grand, cinematic presentation.
Details C+
The mix feels articulate, yet the tiniest ripples don't always sparkle. Background ambience is reasonably clear.
Imaging C+
The stage feels orderly, guiding your ear across positions without confusion. Depth layering is hinted and believable.
Gaming A-
Good fundamental spatial awareness for most gaming scenarios. Handles basic positioning well but may lack nuance in complex situations. Value-to-cost may not be optimal for gaming-focused users.

Mangird Xenns Top Scorings

Average Technical & Tuning Grades

Average Tunign Grade

A-
  • Tuning lands in a pleasing sweet spot with mostly coherent frequency integration. Tonality stays consistent from track to track.

Average Technical Grade

A-
  • A competent technical showing keeps separation intact while delivering modest staging. It feels tidy even when recordings stack layers.
Bass A-
Bass is strong and well-defined, delivering slam with admirable control. Electronic drops hit with authority.
Mids A-
The mid band shines with organic tone and finely rendered textures. Long sessions remain fatigue-free.
Treble A-
The treble is exquisitely tuned, combining crystal detail with relaxed delivery. Micro-details emerge effortlessly.
Dynamics B
Dynamic expression is good, delivering solid impact and convincing contrast. Percussion lands with convincing weight.
Soundstage A
You hear both the breadth and the altitude of the mix, anchored by accurate positional cues. Immersion improves across genres.
Details B+
Good resolution with clear articulation of nuances that keeps complex passages intelligible. Micro-details pop without sounding forced.
Imaging B+
Positions lock in with confidence, sketching a believable stage map. There's a tangible sense of stage geometry.
Gaming A
Clear spatial presentation handles directional cues effectively. Distinguishes key gameplay sounds while maintaining decent immersion. Bad value-to-cost for gaming purpose - not recommended

Softears Studio 4 User Reviews

Example User Posted on ...
0.0

"This is an example review"

Pros
  • Example pro 1
  • Example pro 2
Cons
  • Example con 1
  • Example con 2
No User-Reviews Yet

Share your experience and build your personal ranking list.

You need to be signed in to write your own review

Mangird Xenns Top User Reviews

Example User Posted on ...
0.0

"This is an example review"

Pros
  • Example pro 1
  • Example pro 2
Cons
  • Example con 1
  • Example con 2
No User-Reviews Yet

Share your experience and build your personal ranking list.

You need to be signed in to write your own review

Find your next IEM:

IEM Finder Quiz

new
Use this quiz and answer a few questions to get your individual IEM recommendation list
(1/3) How much are you willing to spend on the IEM?
(2/3) Which sound characteristics are particularly important to you?
(3/3) Which tuning do you prefer?
You can select multiple options.
Buy

Footer