Softears Studio 4 VS Mangird Xenns Top

IEM Comparison: Expert & Community Scores Side-by-Side

IEMRanking.com Home Compare IEMs

Softears Studio 4 and Mangird Xenns Top use 4BA and 1DD+8BA driver setups respectively. Softears Studio 4 costs $450 while Mangird Xenns Top costs $530. Mangird Xenns Top is $80 more expensive. Softears Studio 4 holds a slight 0.1-point edge in reviewer scores (7.4 vs 7.3). Mangird Xenns Top has better bass with a 0.5-point edge, Mangird Xenns Top has slightly better treble with a 0.3-point edge, Mangird Xenns Top has significantly better dynamics with a 1-point edge, Softears Studio 4 has better soundstage with a 0.5-point edge, Mangird Xenns Top has significantly better details with a 1.7-point edge and Mangird Xenns Top has significantly better imaging with a 1.8-point edge.

Insights

Metric Softears Studio 4 Mangird Xenns Top
Bass 6.5 7
Mids 7.3 7.2
Treble 7 7.3
Details 5 6.7
Soundstage 8 7.5
Imaging 5 6.8
Dynamics 5 6
Tonality 7.5 7.1
Technicalities 7.1 7.2

Softears Studio 4 Aggregated Review Score

Average Reviewer Scores

Precogvision
Jays Audio
Super* Review Tim Tuned Jaytiss Gizaudio Axel

Average Reviewer Score:

7.4

Generally Favorable


Mangird Xenns Top Aggregated Review Score

Average Reviewer Scores

Nymz Precogvision
Bad Guy Good Audio Fresh Reviews Audionotions Jays Audio Tim Tuned Shuwa-T
Super* Review

Average Reviewer Score:

7.3

Generally Favorable


Softears Studio 4 User Review Score

Average User Scores

Average User Score: n/a

Based on 0 user reviews

No user reviews yet. Be the first one who writes a review!

Mangird Xenns Top User Review Score

Average User Scores

Average User Score: n/a

Based on 0 user reviews

No user reviews yet. Be the first one who writes a review!

Softears Studio 4 Gaming Score

Gaming Score & Grade

  • The gaming score is prioritizing technical capabilities of the IEM (Separation, Layering, Soundstage) and good value.

Gaming Score

7

Gaming Grade

A-

Mangird Xenns Top Gaming Score

Gaming Score & Grade

  • The gaming score is prioritizing technical capabilities of the IEM (Separation, Layering, Soundstage) and good value.

Gaming Score

7.7

Gaming Grade

A

Softears Studio 4 Scorings

Average Technical & Tuning Grades

Average Tunign Grade

A
  • Well-executed tonal character. No major flaws with good technical control. Smooth presentation works with multiple genres.

Average Technical Grade

A-
  • Competent technical presentation. Handles separation and detail well in most tracks, with modest soundstage and acceptable imaging capabilities.
Bass B+
Good bass foundation with decent impact. Maintains acceptable control while providing satisfying thump in most tracks.
Mids A-
Excellent midrange with natural timbre and great detail retrieval. Vocals are forward and emotive with lifelike instrument reproduction.
Treble A-
Excellent treble: airy, extended and well-controlled. Great micro-detail retrieval without sibilance or harshness.
Dynamics C+
Decent dynamic performance. Good macro-contrast but micro-dynamics could be more nuanced. Satisfactory impact.
Soundstage A+
Exceptional soundstage with holographic imaging. Creates a truly three-dimensional space where instruments float naturally around you.
Details C+
Decent detail retrieval. Handles most textures adequately though micro-details and ambient cues could be more pronounced.
Imaging C+
Decent positional accuracy. Good left/right placement with acceptable center image, though depth positioning is approximate.
Gaming A-
Good fundamental spatial awareness for most gaming scenarios. Handles basic positioning well but may lack nuance in complex situations. Value-to-cost may not be optimal for gaming-focused users.

Mangird Xenns Top Scorings

Average Technical & Tuning Grades

Average Tunign Grade

A-
  • Pleasing tonal balance with good technical control. Minor quirks present but not distracting. Demonstrates decent genre versatility.

Average Technical Grade

A-
  • Competent technical presentation. Handles separation and detail well in most tracks, with modest soundstage and acceptable imaging capabilities.
Bass A-
Strong, well-defined bass with good texture. Delivers satisfying punch and rumble without overwhelming other frequencies.
Mids A-
Excellent midrange with natural timbre and great detail retrieval. Vocals are forward and emotive with lifelike instrument reproduction.
Treble A-
Excellent treble: airy, extended and well-controlled. Great micro-detail retrieval without sibilance or harshness.
Dynamics B
Good dynamic expression with solid impact. Handles volume contrasts well while maintaining good transient snap.
Soundstage A
Excellent spatial presentation - wide, deep and tall. Precise instrument placement with clear separation in all dimensions.
Details B+
Good resolution with clear articulation of nuances. Reveals recording nuances and maintains clarity in complex passages.
Imaging B+
Good imaging with precise instrument placement. Clear localization within the soundstage including front/back positioning.
Gaming A
Clear spatial presentation handles directional cues effectively. Distinguishes key gameplay sounds while maintaining decent immersion. Bad value-to-cost for gaming purpose - not recommended

Softears Studio 4 Reviews

Reviewed by: Super* Review

Super* Review 8* * score normalized
Ad
Using this affiliate link for ordering your Softears Studio 4 or any other IEM helps fund our free service at no extra cost to you.

Price: $449

Buy Softears Studio 4 on HiFiGO

Reviewed by: Tim Tuned

Tim Tuned 8 Reviewer Score
A+ Tuning
A+ Tech
Just great all around, balance with amazingly clean midrange

Tim Tuned original ranking

Tim Tuned Youtube Channel
Bass: A+ Mids: S Treble: S

Reviewed by: Jaytiss

Jaytiss 8 Reviewer Score
A- Tuning
A- Tech
Something magical about this set, but it's not the Bass.

Jaytiss original ranking

Jaytiss Youtube Channel
Mids: A+ Treble: A- Dynamics: C+ Soundstage: A+

Reviewed by: Gizaudio Axel

Gizaudio Axel 8 Reviewer Score
S Tuning
A Tech
A benchmark for tonality and timbre. Neutral, accurate sound with great bass, tonal accuracy, forward vocals, and natural timbre. Excellent isolation. Unvented design and BA bass may not suit everyone.

Gizaudio Axel original ranking

Gizaudio Axel Youtube Channel

Reviewed by: Jays Audio

Jays Audio 7.5 Reviewer Score
S- Tuning
A+ Tech
Best all rounder under $500. "Correct" and neutral tuning. Perfect vocals, not as forward like RSV but zero faults. Slight Improvement over RSV in-terms of seapration and stage size/treble is same/not as warm.

Jays Audio original ranking

Jays Audio Youtube Channel

Reviewed by: Precogvision

Precogvision 5 Reviewer Score
C+ Tuning
C+ Tech
Sounds plasticky and smoothed; inoffensive to the point of being offensive.

Precogvision original ranking

Precogvision Youtube Channel
Bass: C+ Mids: C+ Treble: C+ Dynamics: C+ Details: C+ Imaging: C+

Mangird Xenns Top Reviews

Reviewed by: Super* Review

Super* Review 8* * score normalized

Reviewed by: Bad Guy Good Audio

Bad Guy Good Audio 7.7 Reviewer Score
A- Tuning
A- Tech
check links for more info:

Bad Guy Good Audio original ranking

Bad Guy Good Audio Youtube Channel
Bass: A+ Mids: A- Treble: A-

Reviewed by: Fresh Reviews

Fresh Reviews 7.5* * The score of this reviewer influences only the Gaming Score

Reviewed by: Audionotions

Audionotions 7.5 Reviewer Score
Variation's more fun, twin sibling. Similar technical capabilities to Vari - resolution, instrument separation and imaging are great. Thicker, meatier note weight than Variations and better vocal quality. Less shouty than Vari but also has a better treble extension. The Bass shelf is Harman-ish but with a delayed slope compared to the Variations, which not only helps with male vocals, kick drums, and bass guitars but also adds a lushness to the sound that the Vari was lacking. This sounds more alive than Variations! The one thing that is holding this set back is the slightly pillowy bass. Bass lacks a bit in tactility and punch. Previously Owned

Audionotions original ranking

Website (Audionotions)

Reviewed by: Jays Audio

Jays Audio 7.5 Reviewer Score
A+ Tuning
A+ Tech
What the Variations should've been. Fantastic tehcnincalities. Neutral-bright leaning. Nothing wrong with it at mid-volume, but I can see treble can be too much at highet volumes.

Jays Audio original ranking

Jays Audio Youtube Channel

Reviewed by: Tim Tuned

Tim Tuned 7.5 Reviewer Score
A Tuning
A+ Tech
Exceptionally tuned, full range and detailed Treble might be too much for some

Tim Tuned original ranking

Tim Tuned Youtube Channel
Bass: A+ Mids: A+ Treble: S

Reviewed by: Shuwa-T

Shuwa-T 7.4 Reviewer Score
A- Tuning
A Tech
Comment: What Variations aspired to be. Layered bass slam, full midrange Lower treble gets a little hot, cymbal strikes too prominent

Shuwa-T original ranking

Shuwa-T Website

Bass: A- Mids: A- Treble: A Soundstage: A Details: A+ Imaging: A

Reviewed by: Nymz

Nymz 6.6 Reviewer Score
B+ Tuning
B Tech
Best Mangird has ever done - a slightly more fun Variations. Very clean and technical with a boomier bass. Lower mid-range is still somewhat dry.

Nymz original ranking

Nymz Website

Bass: B Mids: A- Treble: A- Details: B Imaging: A-

Reviewed by: Precogvision

Precogvision 6.1 Reviewer Score
B Tuning
B Tech
Very inofffensive tonality with a soft treble response, sounds like lower and mid-treble are too recessed.

Precogvision original ranking

Precogvision Youtube Channel
Bass: B Mids: A- Treble: B Dynamics: B Details: B Imaging: B

Softears Studio 4 User Reviews

Example User Posted on ...
0.0

"This is an example review"

Pros
  • Example pro 1
  • Example pro 2
Cons
  • Example con 1
  • Example con 2
No User-Reviews Yet

Share your experience and build your personal ranking list.

You need to be signed in to write your own review

Mangird Xenns Top User Reviews

Example User Posted on ...
0.0

"This is an example review"

Pros
  • Example pro 1
  • Example pro 2
Cons
  • Example con 1
  • Example con 2
No User-Reviews Yet

Share your experience and build your personal ranking list.

You need to be signed in to write your own review

Find your next IEM:

IEM Finder Quiz

new
Use this quiz and answer a few questions to get your individual IEM recommendation list
(1/2) How much are you willing to spend on the IEM?
(2/2) Which sound characteristics are particularly important to you?

Footer