Moondrop Quarks VS Simgot EW200

IEM Comparison: Expert & Community Scores Side-by-Side

Home Ranking Compare IEMs

Moondrop Quarks and Simgot EW200 are in-ear monitors. Moondrop Quarks costs $13 while Simgot EW200 costs $39. Simgot EW200 is $26 more expensive. Simgot EW200 holds a decisive 1.1-point edge in reviewer scores (4.4 vs 5.5). Simgot EW200 has significantly better bass with a 2.3-point edge, Simgot EW200 has significantly better mids with a 1.3-point edge, Simgot EW200 has significantly better treble with a 2-point edge, Simgot EW200 has significantly better dynamics with a 2-point edge, Simgot EW200 has better soundstage with a 0.5-point edge, Simgot EW200 has significantly better details with a 2-point edge and Simgot EW200 has significantly better imaging with a 1.8-point edge.

Insights

Metric Moondrop Quarks Simgot EW200
Bass 3.3 5.5
Mids 4 5.3
Treble 3.3 5.3
Details 3.5 5.5
Soundstage 4.5 5
Imaging 3.8 5.5
Dynamics 3 5
Tonality 4 5.7
Technicalities 3.9 5.4

Moondrop Quarks Aggregated Review Score

Average Reviewer Scores

Precogvision
Crin Shuwa-T
Super* Review

Average Reviewer Score:

4.4

Unfavorable


Simgot EW200 Aggregated Review Score

Average Reviewer Scores

Jaytiss Shuwa-T Fresh Reviews Jays Audio
Z-Reviews

Average Reviewer Score:

5.5

Mixed to Negative


Reviews Comparison

Moondrop Quarks reviewed by Shuwa-T

Shuwa-T 4 Reviewer Score
C- Tuning
C- Tech
Comment: Costs next to nothing. Everything else

Shuwa-T original ranking

Shuwa-T Website

Bass: D+ Mids: C+ Treble: D+ Soundstage: C Details: C- Imaging: D+

Moondrop Quarks (more reviews)

Moondrop Quarks reviewed by Super* Review

Super* Review 6* * score normalized

Moondrop Quarks reviewed by Crin

Crin 4.5 Reviewer Score
C+ Tuning
C Tech

Moondrop Quarks reviewed by Precogvision

Precogvision 3.1 Reviewer Score
D Tuning
D Tech
Sounds fairly open. Pinna compensation and transition to treble region needs work.

Precogvision original ranking

Precogvision Youtube Channel
Bass: D Mids: D Treble: D Dynamics: D Details: D Imaging: C-

Simgot EW200 (more reviews)

Simgot EW200 reviewed by Z-Reviews

Z-Reviews 6 * score normalized

Simgot EW200 reviewed by Jaytiss

Jaytiss 5.5 Reviewer Score
C Tuning
C+ Tech
This never disapoints. You need one.

Jaytiss original ranking

Jaytiss Youtube Channel
Mids: C+ Treble: C+ Dynamics: C+ Soundstage: C+

Simgot EW200 reviewed by Fresh Reviews

Fresh Reviews 5* * The score of this reviewer influences only the Gaming Score

Simgot EW200 reviewed by Jays Audio

Jays Audio 5 Reviewer Score
A- Tuning
B Tech
A cheaper Aria 2 with less mid-bass, basically same driver and technical performance - depends on qc and unit variance between the two.

Jays Audio original ranking

Jays Audio Youtube Channel

Moondrop Quarks User Review Score

Average User Scores

Average User Score: n/a

Based on 0 user reviews

No user reviews yet. Be the first one who writes a review!

Simgot EW200 User Review Score

Average User Scores

Average User Score: n/a

Based on 0 user reviews

No user reviews yet. Be the first one who writes a review!

Moondrop Quarks Gaming Score

Gaming Score & Grade

  • The gaming score is prioritizing technical capabilities of the IEM (Separation, Layering, Soundstage) and good value.

Gaming Score

4

Gaming Grade

C-

Simgot EW200 Gaming Score

Gaming Score & Grade

  • The gaming score is prioritizing technical capabilities of the IEM (Separation, Layering, Soundstage) and good value.

Gaming Score

5

Gaming Grade

C+

Moondrop Quarks Scorings

Average Technical & Tuning Grades

Average Tunign Grade

C-
  • Significantly flawed tuning. Noticeable frequency imbalances and unnatural timbre distract from music. Lacks versatility across recordings.

Average Technical Grade

D+
  • Limited resolution; finer nuances are masked. Soundstage feels narrow, and complex passages cause muddiness. Transitions lack finesse.
Bass D
Bass is light and underwhelming. While some faint rumble exists, it lacks punch and authority in any meaningful way.
Mids C-
Midrange is passable but unrefined. Lacks detail and smoothness, with occasional harshness in upper mids.
Treble D
Uneven treble response with noticeable peaks and dips. Can sound both dull and occasionally harsh simultaneously.
Dynamics D
Noticeably compressed dynamics. Musical expression suffers with weak transients and poor contrast between quiet and loud sections.
Soundstage C
Average soundstage - adequate width but flat presentation. Reasonable instrument separation but lacks layering and depth.
Details D+
Modest detail presentation with significant loss of texture. Nuances are masked and complex passages become congested.
Imaging D+
Modest imaging with basic left/right positioning. Lacks precision for center placement and suffers from positional blurring.
Gaming C-
Minimal environmental definition provides only general audio cues. Suitable for games where positioning isn't critical.

Simgot EW200 Scorings

Average Technical & Tuning Grades

Average Tunign Grade

B-
  • Generally enjoyable tonal character with some noticeable unevenness. Maintains listenability while showing room for refinement in frequency balance.

Average Technical Grade

C+
  • Satisfactory technical performance. Handles basic detail retrieval adequately in most tracks. Maintains reasonable cohesion in simpler arrangements.
Bass B-
Average bass performance - present but unremarkable. Has reasonable texture but lacks depth and physicality.
Mids C+
Decent midrange performance - balanced but unremarkable. Adequate clarity for most genres without notable flaws.
Treble C+
Decent treble with acceptable extension and detail. Can sound slightly unrefined but avoids being harsh or sibilant.
Dynamics C+
Decent dynamic performance. Good macro-contrast but micro-dynamics could be more nuanced. Satisfactory impact.
Soundstage C+
Decent spatial presentation with noticeable width. Some depth perception but height dimension remains underdeveloped.
Details B-
Decent detail retrieval. Handles most textures adequately though micro-details and ambient cues could be more pronounced.
Imaging B-
Decent positional accuracy. Good left/right placement with acceptable center image, though depth positioning is approximate.
Gaming C+
Fundamental left/right positioning with limited depth perception. Works for non-competitive gaming but lacks precision.

Moondrop Quarks User Reviews

Example User Posted on ...
0.0

"This is an example review"

Pros
  • Example pro 1
  • Example pro 2
Cons
  • Example con 1
  • Example con 2
No User-Reviews Yet

Share your experience and build your personal ranking list.

You need to be signed in to write your own review

Simgot EW200 User Reviews

Example User Posted on ...
0.0

"This is an example review"

Pros
  • Example pro 1
  • Example pro 2
Cons
  • Example con 1
  • Example con 2
No User-Reviews Yet

Share your experience and build your personal ranking list.

You need to be signed in to write your own review
Ad
Using this affiliate link for ordering your Simgot EW200 or any other IEM helps fund our free service at no extra cost to you.

Price: $39

Buy Simgot EW200 on Aliexpress

Find your next IEM:

IEM Finder Quiz

new
Use this quiz and answer a few questions to get your individual IEM recommendation list
(1/2) How much are you willing to spend on the IEM?
(2/2) Which sound characteristics are particularly important to you?
Buy

Footer