Moondrop Quarks - Reviews & Ratings

5 Reviews (C Tier | 4.9/10)

Home Moondrop Quarks

Summary

Based on 5 reviews, the Moondrop Quarks is drawing mixed impressions from reviewers, with opinions often splitting along personal preferences.

Average Reviewer Scores

Average Reviewer Score:

4.9

Generally Unfavorable

Average User Scores

Average User Score: n/a

Based on 0 user reviews

No user reviews yet. Be the first one who writes a review!

Gaming Score & Grade

  • The gaming score is prioritizing technical capabilities of the IEM (Separation, Layering, Soundstage) and good value.

Gaming Score

4

Gaming Grade

C-

Reviews

Reviewed by: Super* Review

Super* Review 6* * score rescaled + normalized

Reviewed by: Crin

Crin 4.5 Reviewer Score
C+ Tuning
C Tech

Reviewed by: Shuwa-T

Shuwa-T 4 Reviewer Score
C- Tuning
C- Tech
Comment: Costs next to nothing. Everything else

Shuwa-T original ranking

Shuwa-T Website

Bass: D+ Mids: C+ Treble: D+ Soundstage: C Details: C- Imaging: D+

Reviewed by: Precogvision

Precogvision 3.1 Reviewer Score
D Tuning
D Tech
Sounds fairly open. Pinna compensation and transition to treble region needs work.

Precogvision original ranking

Precogvision Youtube Channel
Bass: D Mids: D Treble: D Dynamics: D Details: D Imaging: C-

Reviewed by: Head-Fi.org

Head-Fi.org 7.1 * score rescaled + normalized
19 community members have rated the Moondrop Quarks at an average of 3.8/5 on Head-Fi. Overall sentiment: Strongly Favorable.

URL to full Review

Head-Fi.org original ranking

Tools

IEM Finder Quiz

new
Use this quiz and answer a few questions to get your individual IEM recommendation list
(1/3) How much are you willing to spend on the IEM?
(2/3) Which sound characteristics are particularly important to you?
(3/3) Which tuning do you prefer?
You can select multiple options.

Moondrop Quarks Infos

Discuss Moondrop Quarks with the community

Start an official forum discussion for this IEM. We'll create a new thread titled "Moondrop Quarks discussion thread" in our IEM Discussion Threads.

Compare Moondrop Quarks to popular alternatives

Compare two IEMs side by side
Name

VS

Name
IEM alt. Score
Moondrop Quarks vs. CCA Polaris
CCA Polaris offers better mids, dynamics and soundstage.
5.6
Moondrop Quarks vs. Nicehck DB1
Nicehck DB1 offers better details, bass and treble.
5.6
Moondrop Quarks vs. Moondrop Quarks DSP
Moondrop Quarks DSP offers better treble, mids and bass.
5.6
Moondrop Quarks vs. KZ EDC PRO
KZ EDC PRO offers better bass, treble and details.
5.4
Moondrop Quarks vs. QKZ ZXN
Similar overall performance.
5.3
Moondrop Quarks vs. Fiio JD10
Fiio JD10 offers better dynamics, treble and soundstage.
5.3
Moondrop Quarks vs. KZ EDX Pro
KZ EDX Pro offers better dynamics and bass.
5.3
Moondrop Quarks vs. 7hz Aero
Similar overall performance.
5.3
Moondrop Quarks vs. Tanchjim Zero
Tanchjim Zero offers better dynamics, bass and treble.
5.2
Moondrop Quarks vs. QKZ AK6
Similar overall performance.
5
Best IEMs from below $50

Average Technical & Tuning Grades

Average Tunign Grade

C-
  • The tuning lacks refinement, jumping between dull and shouty without settling. Vocals frequently sound off-kilter.

Average Technical Grade

D+
  • The tuning renders a cramped window into the music, with nuance fading fast. Expect grainy textures to creep in.
Bass D
The bass sits quietly in the background, providing only faint support. Live recordings lose their stage thump.
Mids C-
Expect adequate midrange presence with a touch of grit and unevenness. Textures smear when the mix gets busy.
Treble D
Expect treble that alternates between muted and splashy in the same track. Cymbals sound inconsistent across tracks.
Dynamics D
The presentation feels restrained, with transients arriving blunted and slow. Rhythms lack the expected drive.
Soundstage C
Average soundstage with adequate width but a flat presentation that lacks meaningful layering. Width is acceptable but not exciting.
Details D+
The overall picture is serviceable yet stripped of the tiny flourishes that add realism. Layering lacks consistent clarity.
Imaging D+
Panning effects blur at the edges, making movement sound smeared. Fast panning effects smear noticeably.
Gaming C-
Minimal environmental definition provides only general audio cues. Suitable for games where positioning isn't critical.

User Reviews

Example User Posted on ...
0.0

"This is an example review"

Pros
  • Example pro 1
  • Example pro 2
Cons
  • Example con 1
  • Example con 2
No User-Reviews Yet

Share your experience and build your personal ranking list.

Footer