KZ EDX Pro [4.6/10]
Reviews (2), scores and comparisons for KZ EDX Pro
Average Reviewer Scores
Average Reviewer Score:
4.6Generally Unfavorable
Average User Scores
Average User Score: n/a
Based on 0 user reviews
No user reviews yet. Be the first one who writes a review!
Gaming Score & Grade
- The gaming score is prioritizing technical capabilities of the IEM (Separation, Layering, Soundstage) and good value.
Gaming Score
3.3Gaming Grade
DKZ EDX Pro Details
Driver Configuration: 2DD
Tuning Type: V-shape
Brand: KZ Top KZ IEMs
Price (Msrp): $15
Support our free service! Buying through our affiliate links costs you nothing extra:
Reviews
6*
* score normalized
3.2
Reviewer Score
D
Tuning
D
Tech
Surprisingly extended treble and good bass dynamics for the price. Just crappy tuning per usual. Precogvision Youtube Channel
Bass: C-
Mids: D
Treble: D
Dynamics: C-
Details: D
Imaging: D
Tools
IEM Finder Quiz
new
Use this quiz and answer a few questions to get your individual IEM recommendation list
(1/2) How much are you willing to spend on the IEM?
(2/2) Which sound characteristics are particularly important to you?
KZ EDX Pro Infos
Compare KZ EDX Pro to popular alternatives
Compare two IEMs side by side
Name
VS
Name
| IEM | alt. Score |
|---|---|
|
KZ EDX Pro vs. KZ EDC PRO
KZ EDC PRO offers better details, mids and treble.
|
5.5 |
|
KZ EDX Pro vs. Moondrop Quarks DSP
Moondrop Quarks DSP offers better mids, treble and bass.
|
5.2 |
|
KZ EDX Pro vs. CCA Polaris
CCA Polaris offers better mids, treble and dynamics.
|
5 |
|
KZ EDX Pro vs. Tanchjim Zero
Tanchjim Zero offers better mids, treble and details.
|
4.7 |
|
KZ EDX Pro vs. Moondrop Quarks
Moondrop Quarks offers better mids, imaging and details.
|
4.4 |
|
KZ EDX Pro vs. CCA CRA
CCA CRA offers better bass, mids and treble.
|
4.3 |
|
KZ EDX Pro vs. Tangzu Chang Le
Tangzu Chang Le offers better mids, details and treble.
|
4.2 |
Average Technical & Tuning Grades
Average Tunign Grade
D- Significantly flawed tuning. Noticeable frequency imbalances and unnatural timbre distract from music. Lacks versatility across recordings.
Average Technical Grade
D- Limited resolution; finer nuances are masked. Soundstage feels narrow, and complex passages cause muddiness. Transitions lack finesse.
Bass
C-
Subdued bass response that stays mostly in the background. Lacks energy and impact but maintains basic definition.
Mids
D
Midrange is significantly uneven with coloration. Some frequencies are boosted while others are missing, creating an unnatural tone.
Treble
D
Uneven treble response with noticeable peaks and dips. Can sound both dull and occasionally harsh simultaneously.
Dynamics
C-
Average dynamics - passable but unexciting. Transients are rounded and micro-dynamics lack refinement.
Details
D
Modest detail presentation with significant loss of texture. Nuances are masked and complex passages become congested.
Imaging
D
Modest imaging with basic left/right positioning. Lacks precision for center placement and suffers from positional blurring.
Gaming
D
Compromised imaging significantly impacts gameplay awareness. Directional cues often lack accuracy or consistency.
User Reviews
Example User
Posted on ...
"This is an example review"
Pros
- Example pro 1
- Example pro 2
Cons
- Example con 1
- Example con 2
No User-Reviews Yet
Share your experience and build your personal ranking list.
You need to be signed in to write your own review