KZ EDX Pro - Reviews & Ratings

3 Reviews (C Tier | 5.3/10)

Home Sort gaming score KZ EDX Pro

Summary

Based on 3 reviews, the KZ EDX Pro is receiving steady, if unspectacular, approval from reviewers, highlighting its dependable nature.

Average Reviewer Scores

Precogvision
Super* Review Head-Fi.org

Average Reviewer Score:

5.3

Mixed to Negative

Average User Scores

Average User Score: n/a

Based on 0 user reviews

No user reviews yet. Be the first one who writes a review!

Gaming Score & Grade

  • The gaming score is prioritizing technical capabilities of the IEM (Separation, Layering, Soundstage) and good value.

Gaming Score

3.3

Gaming Grade

D

KZ EDX Pro Details

Driver Configuration: 2DD

Tuning Type: V-Shaped

Top V-Shaped IEMs

Brand: KZ Top KZ IEMs

Price (Msrp): $15

Support our free service! Buying through our affiliate links costs you nothing extra:

$10.99
Buy KZ EDX Pro on
Linsoul
Support our free service! Buying through our affiliate links costs you nothing extra
Buy your next IEM on
HiFiGO
Support our free service! Buying through our affiliate links costs you nothing extra
Buy your next IEM on
Aliexpress
Support our free service! Buying through our affiliate links costs you nothing extra

Reviews

Reviewed by: Super* Review

Super* Review 6* * score rescaled + normalized
check links for more info:

Super* Review original ranking

Super* Review Youtube Channel
YouTube video thumbnail

Buy KZ EDX Pro on Linsoul

Ad
Using this affiliate link for ordering your KZ EDX Pro or any other IEM helps fund our free service at no extra cost to you.

Price: $10.99

Buy KZ EDX Pro on Linsoul

Reviewed by: Precogvision

Precogvision 3.2 Reviewer Score
D Tuning
D Tech
Surprisingly extended treble and good bass dynamics for the price. Just crappy tuning per usual.

Precogvision original ranking

Precogvision Youtube Channel
Bass: C- Mids: D Treble: D Dynamics: C- Details: D Imaging: D

Reviewed by: Head-Fi.org

Head-Fi.org 6.7 * score rescaled + normalized
5 community members have rated the KZ EDX Pro at an average of 3.6/5 on Head-Fi. Overall sentiment: Generally Favorable.

URL to full Review

Head-Fi.org original ranking

Tools

IEM Finder Quiz

new
Use this quiz and answer a few questions to get your individual IEM recommendation list
(1/3) How much are you willing to spend on the IEM?
(2/3) Which sound characteristics are particularly important to you?
(3/3) Which tuning do you prefer?
You can select multiple options.

KZ EDX Pro Infos

Discuss KZ EDX Pro with the community

Start an official forum discussion for this IEM. We'll create a new thread titled "KZ EDX Pro discussion thread" in our IEM Discussion Threads.

Compare KZ EDX Pro to popular alternatives

Take this comparison with a grain of salt—we don't have enough KZ EDX Pro reviews saved yet to provide an unbiased result.
Compare two IEMs side by side
Name

VS

Name
IEM alt. Score
KZ EDX Pro vs. CCA Polaris
CCA Polaris offers better mids, treble and dynamics.
Show CCA Polaris
 5.6
KZ EDX Pro vs. Nicehck DB1
Nicehck DB1 offers better details, mids and treble.
Show Nicehck DB1
 5.6
KZ EDX Pro vs. Moondrop Quarks DSP
Moondrop Quarks DSP offers better mids, treble and bass.
Show Moondrop Quarks DSP
 5.6
KZ EDX Pro vs. KZ EDC PRO
KZ EDC PRO offers better details, mids and treble.
Show KZ EDC PRO
 5.4
KZ EDX Pro vs. Fiio JD10
Fiio JD10 offers better mids, treble and dynamics.
Show Fiio JD10
 5.3
KZ EDX Pro vs. 7hz Aero
Similar overall performance.
Show 7hz Aero
 5.3
KZ EDX Pro vs. Tanchjim Zero
Tanchjim Zero offers better mids, treble and details.
Show Tanchjim Zero
 5.2
KZ EDX Pro vs. Moondrop Quarks
Moondrop Quarks offers better mids, imaging and details.
Show Moondrop Quarks
 4.9
KZ EDX Pro vs. CCA CRA
CCA CRA offers better bass, mids and treble.
Show CCA CRA
 4.6
KZ EDX Pro vs. Tangzu Chang Le
Tangzu Chang Le offers better mids, details and treble.
Show Tangzu Chang Le
 4.2
Best IEMs from below $50

Average Technical & Tuning Grades

Average Tunign Grade

D
  • The tuning lacks refinement, jumping between dull and shouty without settling. Vocals frequently sound off-kilter.

Average Technical Grade

D
  • Even moderate complexity exposes the limited resolution and narrow sense of space. Technical fans will find it lacking.
Bass C-
Bass stays subdued, content to hover in the background. It keeps things tidy, yet unremarkable.
Mids D
Midrange is highly uneven, veering between shouty peaks and hollow dips. Tonality swings between shouty and withdrawn.
Treble D
Highs feel erratic, with dips and spikes that make the signature unpredictable. It alternates between splashy and dull.
Dynamics C-
Dynamics are average—competent yet lacking real excitement. It keeps music listenable but uninspiring.
Details D
It can follow the main lines but loses composure once arrangements become busy. Fine articulation is frequently glossed over.
Imaging D
It sketches positions loosely while allowing outlines to blur. Instrument outlines remain fuzzy.
Gaming D
Compromised imaging significantly impacts gameplay awareness. Directional cues often lack accuracy or consistency.

User Reviews

Example User Posted on ...
0.0

"This is an example review"

Pros
  • Example pro 1
  • Example pro 2
Cons
  • Example con 1
  • Example con 2
No User-Reviews Yet

Share your experience and build your personal ranking list.

Buy

Footer