CCA CRA - Reviews & Ratings

7 Reviews (C Tier | 4.6/10)

Home CCA CRA

Summary

Based on 7 reviews, the CCA CRA is a situational pick according to reviewers, who suggest matching it carefully to individual tastes.

Average Reviewer Scores

Average Reviewer Score:

4.6

Generally Unfavorable

Average User Scores

Average User Score: n/a

Based on 0 user reviews

No user reviews yet. Be the first one who writes a review!

Gaming Score & Grade

  • The gaming score is prioritizing technical capabilities of the IEM (Separation, Layering, Soundstage) and good value.

Gaming Score

4.4

Gaming Grade

C-

Reviews

Reviewed by: Super* Review

Super* Review 6* * score rescaled + normalized
Ad
Using this affiliate link for ordering your CCA CRA or any other IEM helps fund our free service at no extra cost to you.

Price: $15

Buy CCA CRA on Linsoul

Reviewed by: Tim Tuned

Tim Tuned 5 Reviewer Score
C+ Tuning
B Tech
Fun, well tuned v-shape signature Details & Stage

Tim Tuned original ranking

Tim Tuned Youtube Channel
Bass: A- Mids: A- Treble: A-

Reviewed by: Precogvision

Precogvision 4.2 Reviewer Score
C Tuning
C- Tech
High-clarity, potentially fatiguing sound with surprisingly good bass and treble extension.

Precogvision original ranking

Precogvision Youtube Channel
Bass: B Mids: C- Treble: C- Dynamics: C+ Details: C- Imaging: D

Reviewed by: Kois Archive

Kois Archive 3.6 Reviewer Score
C Tuning
C- Tech

Reviewed by: Nymz

Nymz 3.3 Reviewer Score
D Tuning
D Tech
Insane value. Still a bassy KZ, but for 15$, hard not to rec. Punches at higher price bracket, but still has 4.5k and 8k peaks for my library. I recomend EQing it - turns it into a beast for the price.

Nymz original ranking

Nymz Website

Bass: C- Mids: D Treble: D Details: D Imaging: D

Reviewed by: Audionotions

Audionotions 3 Reviewer Score
Big bass, big treble. A bit too spicy for my tastes

Audionotions original ranking

Website (Audionotions)

Reviewed by: Head-Fi.org

Head-Fi.org 7.2 * score rescaled + normalized
29 community members have rated the CCA CRA at an average of 3.9/5 on Head-Fi. Overall sentiment: Strongly Favorable.

URL to full Review

Head-Fi.org original ranking

Tools

IEM Finder Quiz

new
Use this quiz and answer a few questions to get your individual IEM recommendation list
(1/3) How much are you willing to spend on the IEM?
(2/3) Which sound characteristics are particularly important to you?
(3/3) Which tuning do you prefer?
You can select multiple options.

CCA CRA Infos

Discuss CCA CRA with the community

Start an official forum discussion for this IEM. We'll create a new thread titled "CCA CRA discussion thread" in our IEM Discussion Threads.

Compare CCA CRA to popular alternatives

Compare two IEMs side by side
Name

VS

Name
IEM alt. Score
CCA CRA vs. CCA Polaris
CCA Polaris offers better mids.
5.6
CCA CRA vs. Nicehck DB1
Nicehck DB1 offers better details and imaging.
5.6
CCA CRA vs. Moondrop Quarks DSP
Moondrop Quarks DSP offers better mids, treble and bass.
5.6
CCA CRA vs. KZ EDC PRO
KZ EDC PRO offers better details, imaging and mids.
5.4
CCA CRA vs. Fiio JD10
Fiio JD10 offers better mids and treble.
5.3
CCA CRA vs. KZ EDX Pro
Similar overall performance.
5.3
CCA CRA vs. 7hz Aero
Similar overall performance.
5.3
CCA CRA vs. Tanchjim Zero
Tanchjim Zero offers better imaging and details.
5.2
CCA CRA vs. Moondrop Quarks
Moondrop Quarks offers better imaging.
4.9
CCA CRA vs. Tangzu Chang Le
Tangzu Chang Le offers better details, imaging and mids.
4.2
Best IEMs from below $50

Average Technical & Tuning Grades

Average Tunign Grade

C-
  • Uneven emphasis across the spectrum keeps the presentation unsettled and awkward. Acoustic instruments lose their natural body.

Average Technical Grade

C-
  • Even moderate complexity exposes the limited resolution and narrow sense of space. Technical fans will find it lacking.
Bass B-
It delivers adequate punch and texture, though nothing stands out. Sub-bass presence is hinted rather than delivered.
Mids C
Midrange is passable yet unrefined, revealing grain and occasional harshness. It sounds a bit grainy on detailed recordings.
Treble C
The top end sounds acceptable but lacks the smoothness of higher tiers. Air is hinted at more than delivered.
Dynamics C+
You get reliable macrodynamics, with micro shifts that remain only adequate. A reliable performer for most tracks.
Details D+
Textural clues dull down, robbing strings and vocals of their natural grit. You hear outlines rather than textures.
Imaging D
Modest imaging with basic left/right positioning that never quite nails the center image. Left/right cues exist but are rough.
Gaming C-
Minimal environmental definition provides only general audio cues. Suitable for games where positioning isn't critical.

User Reviews

Example User Posted on ...
0.0

"This is an example review"

Pros
  • Example pro 1
  • Example pro 2
Cons
  • Example con 1
  • Example con 2
No User-Reviews Yet

Share your experience and build your personal ranking list.

Buy

Footer