Tangzu Chang Le [4.2/10]

Reviews (2), scores and comparisons for Tangzu Chang Le

IEMRanking.com Home Tangzu Chang Le

Average Reviewer Scores

Shuwa-T Jays Audio

Average Reviewer Score:

4.2

Unfavorable

Average User Scores

Average User Score: n/a

Based on 0 user reviews

No user reviews yet. Be the first one who writes a review!

Gaming Score & Grade

  • The gaming score is prioritizing technical capabilities of the IEM (Separation, Layering, Soundstage) and good value.

Gaming Score

4.8

Gaming Grade

C

Reviews

Reviewed by: Shuwa-T

Shuwa-T 4.3 Reviewer Score
C- Tuning
C- Tech
check links for more info:

Shuwa-T original ranking

Shuwa-T Website

Bass: C- Mids: C+ Treble: C- Soundstage: C- Details: C Imaging: C-

Reviewed by: Jays Audio

Jays Audio 4 Reviewer Score
B+ Tuning
C+ Tech
The closest v-shape to the OG MH755/750

Jays Audio original ranking

Jays Audio Youtube Channel

Tools

IEM Finder Quiz

new
Use this quiz and answer a few questions to get your individual IEM recommendation list
(1/2) How much are you willing to spend on the IEM?
(2/2) Which sound characteristics are particularly important to you?

Tangzu Chang Le Infos

Compare Tangzu Chang Le to popular alternatives

Compare two IEMs side by side
Name

VS

Name
IEM alt. Score
Tangzu Chang Le vs. KZ EDC PRO
KZ EDC PRO offers better bass, treble and details.
5.5
Tangzu Chang Le vs. Moondrop Quarks DSP
Moondrop Quarks DSP offers better treble, bass and mids.
5.2
Tangzu Chang Le vs. CCA Polaris
CCA Polaris offers better soundstage and mids.
5
Tangzu Chang Le vs. Tanchjim Zero
Similar overall performance.
4.7
Tangzu Chang Le vs. KZ EDX Pro
Similar overall performance.
4.6
Tangzu Chang Le vs. Moondrop Quarks
Moondrop Quarks offers better soundstage.
4.4
Tangzu Chang Le vs. CCA CRA
CCA CRA offers better bass and treble.
4.3
Best IEMs from below $50

Average Technical & Tuning Grades

Average Tunign Grade

C+
  • Generally enjoyable tonal character with some noticeable unevenness. Maintains listenability while showing room for refinement in frequency balance.

Average Technical Grade

C
  • Limited resolution; finer nuances are masked. Soundstage feels narrow, and complex passages cause muddiness. Transitions lack finesse.
Bass C-
Subdued bass response that stays mostly in the background. Lacks energy and impact but maintains basic definition.
Mids C+
Decent midrange performance - balanced but unremarkable. Adequate clarity for most genres without notable flaws.
Treble C-
Average treble performance - present but lacking refinement. Some graininess or splashiness affects clarity.
Soundstage C-
Average soundstage - adequate width but flat presentation. Reasonable instrument separation but lacks layering and depth.
Details C
Average resolution - reveals basic elements but misses subtleties. Satisfactory for casual listening but lacks refinement.
Imaging C-
Average imaging - reasonable localization but lacks specificity. Instruments have general positions but lack pinpoint accuracy.
Gaming C
Minimal environmental definition provides only general audio cues. Suitable for games where positioning isn't critical.

User Reviews

Example User Posted on ...
0.0

"This is an example review"

Pros
  • Example pro 1
  • Example pro 2
Cons
  • Example con 1
  • Example con 2
No User-Reviews Yet

Share your experience and build your personal ranking list.

Footer