KZ EDC PRO VS Tangzu Chang Le

IEM Comparison: Expert & Community Scores Side-by-Side

Home Ranking Compare IEMs

KZ EDC PRO and Tangzu Chang Le are in-ear monitors. KZ EDC PRO costs $12 while Tangzu Chang Le costs $15. Tangzu Chang Le is $3 more expensive. KZ EDC PRO holds a decisive 1.2-point edge in reviewer scores (5.4 vs 4.2). KZ EDC PRO has significantly better bass with a 1.8-point edge, KZ EDC PRO has slightly better mids with a 0.3-point edge, KZ EDC PRO has significantly better treble with a 1.3-point edge, KZ EDC PRO has significantly better soundstage with a 1-point edge, KZ EDC PRO has significantly better details with a 1-point edge and KZ EDC PRO has better imaging with a 0.5-point edge.

Insights

Metric KZ EDC PRO Tangzu Chang Le
Bass 5.8 4
Mids 5.3 5
Treble 5.3 4
Details 5.5 4.5
Soundstage 5 4
Imaging 4.5 4
Dynamics 5 4.2
Tonality 5.9 5.4
Technicalities 5.1 4.6
Take these comparisons with a grain of salt—we don't have enough Tangzu Chang Le reviews saved yet to provide an unbiased result.

KZ EDC PRO Aggregated Review Score

Average Reviewer Scores

Average Reviewer Score:

5.4

Mixed to Negative


Tangzu Chang Le Aggregated Review Score

Average Reviewer Scores

Average Reviewer Score:

4.2

Unfavorable


Reviews Comparison

KZ EDC PRO reviewed by Shuwa-T

Shuwa-T 4.8 Reviewer Score
C Tuning
C Tech
How this was recommended ever befuddles me, nothing about this set works unless you listen to only the two extremes

Shuwa-T original ranking

Shuwa-T Website

Bass: B- Mids: C- Treble: C+ Soundstage: C- Details: B- Imaging: C
Ad
Using this affiliate link for ordering your KZ EDC PRO or any other IEM helps fund our free service at no extra cost to you.

Price: $14.99

Buy KZ EDC PRO on Linsoul

Tangzu Chang Le reviewed by Shuwa-T

Shuwa-T 4.3 Reviewer Score
C- Tuning
C- Tech
check links for more info:

Shuwa-T original ranking

Shuwa-T Website

Bass: C- Mids: C+ Treble: C- Soundstage: C- Details: C Imaging: C-

KZ EDC PRO reviewed by Jays Audio

Jays Audio 4 Reviewer Score
A- Tuning
C+ Tech
Nicely tuned v shape, smooth treble for the price/single DD, also very cheap on sale... but KZ.

Jays Audio original ranking

Jays Audio Youtube Channel

Tangzu Chang Le reviewed by Jays Audio

Jays Audio 4 Reviewer Score
B+ Tuning
C+ Tech
The closest v-shape to the OG MH755/750

Jays Audio original ranking

Jays Audio Youtube Channel

KZ EDC PRO (more reviews)

KZ EDC PRO reviewed by Bad Guy Good Audio

Bad Guy Good Audio 7.5 Reviewer Score
A+ Tuning
A- Tech
Tonality, inoffensive tuning BA bass

Bad Guy Good Audio original ranking

Bad Guy Good Audio Youtube Channel
Bass: B Mids: A- Treble: A-

KZ EDC PRO reviewed by Audio Amigo

Audio Amigo 6 * score rescaled + normalized
Great driver with great tuning for the price. Try to get for under $10

Audio Amigo original ranking

Audio Amigo Youtube Channel

KZ EDC PRO reviewed by Jaytiss

Jaytiss 5.8 Reviewer Score
C Tuning
C- Tech
12 Dollars, moderate your expectations, but it's ok.

Jaytiss original ranking

Jaytiss Youtube Channel
Mids: C+ Treble: C- Dynamics: C+ Soundstage: B

KZ EDC PRO reviewed by Kois Archive

Kois Archive 4 Reviewer Score
C+ Tuning
C+ Tech
Rating: D- | Value: ⭐⭐ | Comfort: 10 can buy it for $1! muddy bass

Kois Archive original ranking

Kois Archive Youtube Channel

KZ EDC PRO User Review Score

Average User Scores

Average User Score: n/a

Based on 0 user reviews

No user reviews yet. Be the first one who writes a review!

Tangzu Chang Le User Review Score

Average User Scores

Average User Score: n/a

Based on 0 user reviews

No user reviews yet. Be the first one who writes a review!

KZ EDC PRO Gaming Score

Gaming Score & Grade

  • The gaming score is prioritizing technical capabilities of the IEM (Separation, Layering, Soundstage) and good value.

Gaming Score

5.4

Gaming Grade

C+

Tangzu Chang Le Gaming Score

Gaming Score & Grade

  • The gaming score is prioritizing technical capabilities of the IEM (Separation, Layering, Soundstage) and good value.

Gaming Score

4.8

Gaming Grade

C

KZ EDC PRO Scorings

Average Technical & Tuning Grades

Average Tunign Grade

B-
  • The tuning leans easygoing, yet occasional unevenness nudges it away from greatness. A bit of EQ polish can smooth things nicely.

Average Technical Grade

C+
  • Technical ability is serviceable, keeping basic detail intact across simpler tracks. It keeps up with acoustic tracks without much fuss.
Bass B-
The bass offers steady support without stepping into the spotlight. There's just enough punch for everyday playlists.
Mids C+
Midrange performance is decent, offering balanced presence without major flaws. It works well for casual background listening.
Treble C+
Treble is decent, offering acceptable extension without harshness. It balances presence with a touch of restraint.
Dynamics C+
Dynamic performance is decent, delivering respectable macro swings with limited nuance. There's a fair amount of macrodynamic swing.
Soundstage C+
You start to perceive distinct rows of players even if the ceiling still feels low. Layering is present but still modest.
Details B-
The mix feels articulate, yet the tiniest ripples don't always sparkle. Background ambience is reasonably clear.
Imaging C
Separation is good enough for casual listening yet misses audiophile precision. Depth remains limited but present.
Gaming C+
Fundamental left/right positioning with limited depth perception. Works for non-competitive gaming but lacks precision.

Tangzu Chang Le Scorings

Average Technical & Tuning Grades

Average Tunign Grade

C+
  • A mostly enjoyable signature keeps things listenable despite a handful of quirks. It handles most playlists without major complaints.

Average Technical Grade

C
  • The tuning renders a cramped window into the music, with nuance fading fast. Expect grainy textures to creep in.
Bass C-
Low-end presence is gentle and restrained, favoring balance over slam. There's enough presence for casual listening.
Mids C+
It presents a stable midrange foundation suitable for everyday listening. Clarity is serviceable without standing out.
Treble C-
Treble is adequate overall, though its texture can feel coarse. Longer sessions may expose grain.
Soundstage C-
Stereo spread is acceptable, yet the image resembles a stage set without depth behind the curtain. Depth feels more like a gentle slope.
Details C
You get the outline of textures, though the finer brushstrokes remain faint. Background information is audible but soft.
Imaging C-
Depth hints are present though they rarely extend far beyond the stage front. Movement effects are understandable.
Gaming C
Minimal environmental definition provides only general audio cues. Suitable for games where positioning isn't critical.

KZ EDC PRO User Reviews

Example User Posted on ...
0.0

"This is an example review"

Pros
  • Example pro 1
  • Example pro 2
Cons
  • Example con 1
  • Example con 2
No User-Reviews Yet

Share your experience and build your personal ranking list.

You need to be signed in to write your own review

Tangzu Chang Le User Reviews

Example User Posted on ...
0.0

"This is an example review"

Pros
  • Example pro 1
  • Example pro 2
Cons
  • Example con 1
  • Example con 2
No User-Reviews Yet

Share your experience and build your personal ranking list.

You need to be signed in to write your own review

Find your next IEM:

IEM Finder Quiz

new
Use this quiz and answer a few questions to get your individual IEM recommendation list
(1/3) How much are you willing to spend on the IEM?
(2/3) Which sound characteristics are particularly important to you?
(3/3) Which tuning do you prefer?
You can select multiple options.
Buy

Footer