CCA CRA VS Tangzu Chang Le

IEM Comparison: Expert & Community Scores Side-by-Side

Home Ranking Compare IEMs

CCA CRA and Tangzu Chang Le are in-ear monitors. CCA CRA costs $14 while Tangzu Chang Le costs $15. Tangzu Chang Le is $1 more expensive. CCA CRA holds a clear 0.5-point edge in reviewer scores (4.6 vs 4.2). CCA CRA has significantly better bass with a 1.7-point edge, Tangzu Chang Le has slightly better mids with a 0.3-point edge, CCA CRA has better treble with a 0.7-point edge, Tangzu Chang Le has significantly better details with a 1-point edge and Tangzu Chang Le has significantly better imaging with a 1-point edge.

Insights

Metric CCA CRA Tangzu Chang Le
Bass 5.7 4
Mids 4.7 5
Treble 4.7 4
Details 3.5 4.5
Soundstage 4.6 4
Imaging 3 4
Dynamics 5 4.2
Tonality 4.4 5.4
Technicalities 4.3 4.6
Take these comparisons with a grain of salt—we don't have enough Tangzu Chang Le reviews saved yet to provide an unbiased result.

CCA CRA Aggregated Review Score

Average Reviewer Scores

Kois Archive Nymz Audionotions
Precogvision
Tim Tuned
Super* Review
Head-Fi.org

Average Reviewer Score:

4.6

Generally Unfavorable

Tangzu Chang Le Aggregated Review Score

Average Reviewer Scores

Shuwa-T Jays Audio

Average Reviewer Score:

4.2

Unfavorable

Reviews Comparison

CCA CRA (more reviews)

CCA CRA reviewed by Super* Review

Super* Review 6* * score rescaled + normalized
check links for more info:

Super* Review original ranking

Super* Review Youtube Channel

Buy CCA CRA on Linsoul

Ad
Using this affiliate link for ordering your CCA CRA or any other IEM helps fund our free service at no extra cost to you.

Price: $15

Buy CCA CRA on Linsoul

CCA CRA reviewed by Tim Tuned

Tim Tuned 5 Reviewer Score
C+ Tuning
B Tech
Fun, well tuned v-shape signature Details & Stage

Tim Tuned original ranking

Tim Tuned Youtube Channel
Bass: A- Mids: A- Treble: A-
YouTube video thumbnail

CCA CRA reviewed by Precogvision

Precogvision 4.2 Reviewer Score
C Tuning
C- Tech
High-clarity, potentially fatiguing sound with surprisingly good bass and treble extension.

Precogvision original ranking

Precogvision Youtube Channel
Bass: B Mids: C- Treble: C- Dynamics: C+ Details: C- Imaging: D

CCA CRA reviewed by Kois Archive

Kois Archive 3.6 Reviewer Score
C Tuning
C- Tech
Rating: F | Comfort: 8 bass muddy bass

Kois Archive original ranking

Kois Archive Youtube Channel

CCA CRA reviewed by Nymz

Nymz 3.3 Reviewer Score
D Tuning
D Tech
Insane value. Still a bassy KZ, but for 15$, hard not to rec. Punches at higher price bracket, but still has 4.5k and 8k peaks for my library. I recomend EQing it - turns it into a beast for the price.

Nymz original ranking

Nymz Website

Bass: C- Mids: D Treble: D Details: D Imaging: D

CCA CRA reviewed by Audionotions

Audionotions 3 Reviewer Score
Big bass, big treble. A bit too spicy for my tastes

Audionotions original ranking

Website (Audionotions)

CCA CRA reviewed by Head-Fi.org

Head-Fi.org 7.2 * score rescaled + normalized
29 community members have rated the CCA CRA at an average of 3.9/5 on Head-Fi. Overall sentiment: Strongly Favorable.

URL to full Review

Head-Fi.org original ranking

Tangzu Chang Le (more reviews)

Tangzu Chang Le reviewed by Shuwa-T

Shuwa-T 4.3 Reviewer Score
C- Tuning
C- Tech
check links for more info:

Shuwa-T original ranking

Shuwa-T Website

Bass: C- Mids: C+ Treble: C- Soundstage: C- Details: C Imaging: C-

Tangzu Chang Le reviewed by Jays Audio

Jays Audio 4 Reviewer Score
B+ Tuning
C+ Tech
The closest v-shape to the OG MH755/750

Jays Audio original ranking

Jays Audio Youtube Channel

CCA CRA User Review Score

Average User Scores

Average User Score: n/a

Based on 0 user reviews

No user reviews yet. Be the first one who writes a review!

Tangzu Chang Le User Review Score

Average User Scores

Average User Score: n/a

Based on 0 user reviews

No user reviews yet. Be the first one who writes a review!

CCA CRA Gaming Score

Gaming Score & Grade

  • The gaming score is prioritizing technical capabilities of the IEM (Separation, Layering, Soundstage) and good value.

Gaming Score

4.4

Gaming Grade

C-

Tangzu Chang Le Gaming Score

Gaming Score & Grade

  • The gaming score is prioritizing technical capabilities of the IEM (Separation, Layering, Soundstage) and good value.

Gaming Score

4.8

Gaming Grade

C

CCA CRA Scorings

Average Technical & Tuning Grades

Average Tunign Grade

C-
  • Uneven emphasis across the spectrum keeps the presentation unsettled and awkward. Acoustic instruments lose their natural body.

Average Technical Grade

C-
  • Even moderate complexity exposes the limited resolution and narrow sense of space. Technical fans will find it lacking.
Bass B-
It delivers adequate punch and texture, though nothing stands out. Sub-bass presence is hinted rather than delivered.
Mids C
Midrange is passable yet unrefined, revealing grain and occasional harshness. It sounds a bit grainy on detailed recordings.
Treble C
The top end sounds acceptable but lacks the smoothness of higher tiers. Air is hinted at more than delivered.
Dynamics C+
You get reliable macrodynamics, with micro shifts that remain only adequate. A reliable performer for most tracks.
Details D+
Textural clues dull down, robbing strings and vocals of their natural grit. You hear outlines rather than textures.
Imaging D
Modest imaging with basic left/right positioning that never quite nails the center image. Left/right cues exist but are rough.
Gaming C-
Minimal environmental definition provides only general audio cues. Suitable for games where positioning isn't critical.

Tangzu Chang Le Scorings

Average Technical & Tuning Grades

Average Tunign Grade

C+
  • A mostly enjoyable signature keeps things listenable despite a handful of quirks. It handles most playlists without major complaints.

Average Technical Grade

C
  • The tuning renders a cramped window into the music, with nuance fading fast. Expect grainy textures to creep in.
Bass C-
Low-end presence is gentle and restrained, favoring balance over slam. There's enough presence for casual listening.
Mids C+
It presents a stable midrange foundation suitable for everyday listening. Clarity is serviceable without standing out.
Treble C-
Treble is adequate overall, though its texture can feel coarse. Longer sessions may expose grain.
Soundstage C-
Stereo spread is acceptable, yet the image resembles a stage set without depth behind the curtain. Depth feels more like a gentle slope.
Details C
You get the outline of textures, though the finer brushstrokes remain faint. Background information is audible but soft.
Imaging C-
Depth hints are present though they rarely extend far beyond the stage front. Movement effects are understandable.
Gaming C
Minimal environmental definition provides only general audio cues. Suitable for games where positioning isn't critical.

CCA CRA User Reviews

Example User Posted on ...
0.0

"This is an example review"

Pros
  • Example pro 1
  • Example pro 2
Cons
  • Example con 1
  • Example con 2
No User-Reviews Yet

Share your experience and build your personal ranking list.

You need to be signed in to write your own review

Tangzu Chang Le User Reviews

Example User Posted on ...
0.0

"This is an example review"

Pros
  • Example pro 1
  • Example pro 2
Cons
  • Example con 1
  • Example con 2
No User-Reviews Yet

Share your experience and build your personal ranking list.

You need to be signed in to write your own review

Find your next IEM:

IEM Finder Quiz

new
Use this quiz and answer a few questions to get your individual IEM recommendation list
(1/3) How much are you willing to spend on the IEM?
(2/3) Which sound characteristics are particularly important to you?
(3/3) Which tuning do you prefer?
You can select multiple options.
Buy

Footer