Tanchjim Zero [4.7/10]
Reviews (3), scores and comparisons for Tanchjim Zero
IEMRanking.com
Home
Tanchjim Zero
Average Reviewer Scores
Average Reviewer Score:
4.7Generally Unfavorable
Average User Scores
Average User Score: n/a
Based on 0 user reviews
No user reviews yet. Be the first one who writes a review!
Gaming Score & Grade
- The gaming score is prioritizing technical capabilities of the IEM (Separation, Layering, Soundstage) and good value.
Gaming Score
4.4Gaming Grade
C-Tanchjim Zero Details
Driver Configuration: 1DD
Tuning Type: Bright neutral
Brand: TANCHJIM Top TANCHJIM IEMs
Price (Msrp): $15
Support our free service! Buying through our affiliate links costs you nothing extra:
Reviews
6*
* score normalized
4.5
Reviewer Score
B-
Tuning
C
Tech
check links for more info: Crin Youtube Channel
3.6
Reviewer Score
C-
Tuning
C-
Tech
Too shouty and lacks the bass emphasis to balance it out. Precogvision Youtube Channel
Bass: C-
Mids: C-
Treble: C-
Dynamics: C-
Details: C-
Imaging: C-
Tools
IEM Finder Quiz
new
Use this quiz and answer a few questions to get your individual IEM recommendation list
(1/2) How much are you willing to spend on the IEM?
(2/2) Which sound characteristics are particularly important to you?
Tanchjim Zero Infos
Compare Tanchjim Zero to popular alternatives
Compare two IEMs side by side
Name
VS
Name
| IEM | alt. Score |
|---|---|
|
Tanchjim Zero vs. KZ EDC PRO
KZ EDC PRO offers better bass, details and mids.
|
5.5 |
|
Tanchjim Zero vs. Moondrop Quarks DSP
Moondrop Quarks DSP offers better mids, treble and bass.
|
5.2 |
|
Tanchjim Zero vs. CCA Polaris
CCA Polaris offers better mids and dynamics.
|
5 |
|
Tanchjim Zero vs. KZ EDX Pro
Similar overall performance.
|
4.6 |
|
Tanchjim Zero vs. Moondrop Quarks
Similar overall performance.
|
4.4 |
|
Tanchjim Zero vs. CCA CRA
CCA CRA offers better bass, dynamics and mids.
|
4.3 |
|
Tanchjim Zero vs. Tangzu Chang Le
Tangzu Chang Le offers better mids and details.
|
4.2 |
Average Technical & Tuning Grades
Average Tunign Grade
C- Significantly flawed tuning. Noticeable frequency imbalances and unnatural timbre distract from music. Lacks versatility across recordings.
Average Technical Grade
C-- Limited resolution; finer nuances are masked. Soundstage feels narrow, and complex passages cause muddiness. Transitions lack finesse.
Bass
C-
Subdued bass response that stays mostly in the background. Lacks energy and impact but maintains basic definition.
Mids
C-
Midrange is passable but unrefined. Lacks detail and smoothness, with occasional harshness in upper mids.
Treble
C-
Average treble performance - present but lacking refinement. Some graininess or splashiness affects clarity.
Dynamics
C-
Average dynamics - passable but unexciting. Transients are rounded and micro-dynamics lack refinement.
Details
C-
Average resolution - reveals basic elements but misses subtleties. Satisfactory for casual listening but lacks refinement.
Imaging
C-
Average imaging - reasonable localization but lacks specificity. Instruments have general positions but lack pinpoint accuracy.
Gaming
C-
Minimal environmental definition provides only general audio cues. Suitable for games where positioning isn't critical.
User Reviews
Example User
Posted on ...
"This is an example review"
Pros
- Example pro 1
- Example pro 2
Cons
- Example con 1
- Example con 2
No User-Reviews Yet
Share your experience and build your personal ranking list.
You need to be signed in to write your own review