CCA CRA VS Tangzu Chang Le

IEM Comparison: Expert & Community Scores Side-by-Side

IEMRanking.com Home Compare IEMs

CCA CRA and Tangzu Chang Le are in-ear monitors. CCA CRA costs $14 while Tangzu Chang Le costs $15. Tangzu Chang Le is $1 more expensive. CCA CRA holds a slight 0.1-point edge in reviewer scores (4.3 vs 4.2). CCA CRA has significantly better bass with a 1.7-point edge, Tangzu Chang Le has slightly better mids with a 0.3-point edge, CCA CRA has better treble with a 0.7-point edge, Tangzu Chang Le has significantly better details with a 1-point edge and Tangzu Chang Le has significantly better imaging with a 1-point edge.

Insights

Metric CCA CRA Tangzu Chang Le
Bass 5.7 4
Mids 4.7 5
Treble 4.7 4
Details 3.5 4.5
Soundstage 4.3 4
Imaging 3 4
Dynamics 5 4.2
Tonality 4.3 5.4
Technicalities 4.4 4.6

CCA CRA Aggregated Review Score

Average Reviewer Scores

Nymz Audionotions
Precogvision
Tim Tuned
Super* Review

Average Reviewer Score:

4.3

Unfavorable


Tangzu Chang Le Aggregated Review Score

Average Reviewer Scores

Shuwa-T Jays Audio

Average Reviewer Score:

4.2

Unfavorable


CCA CRA User Review Score

Average User Scores

Average User Score: n/a

Based on 0 user reviews

No user reviews yet. Be the first one who writes a review!

Tangzu Chang Le User Review Score

Average User Scores

Average User Score: n/a

Based on 0 user reviews

No user reviews yet. Be the first one who writes a review!

CCA CRA Gaming Score

Gaming Score & Grade

  • The gaming score is prioritizing technical capabilities of the IEM (Separation, Layering, Soundstage) and good value.

Gaming Score

4.4

Gaming Grade

C-

Tangzu Chang Le Gaming Score

Gaming Score & Grade

  • The gaming score is prioritizing technical capabilities of the IEM (Separation, Layering, Soundstage) and good value.

Gaming Score

4.8

Gaming Grade

C

CCA CRA Scorings

Average Technical & Tuning Grades

Average Tunign Grade

C-
  • Significantly flawed tuning. Noticeable frequency imbalances and unnatural timbre distract from music. Lacks versatility across recordings.

Average Technical Grade

C-
  • Limited resolution; finer nuances are masked. Soundstage feels narrow, and complex passages cause muddiness. Transitions lack finesse.
Bass B-
Average bass performance - present but unremarkable. Has reasonable texture but lacks depth and physicality.
Mids C
Midrange is passable but unrefined. Lacks detail and smoothness, with occasional harshness in upper mids.
Treble C
Average treble performance - present but lacking refinement. Some graininess or splashiness affects clarity.
Dynamics C+
Decent dynamic performance. Good macro-contrast but micro-dynamics could be more nuanced. Satisfactory impact.
Details D+
Modest detail presentation with significant loss of texture. Nuances are masked and complex passages become congested.
Imaging D
Modest imaging with basic left/right positioning. Lacks precision for center placement and suffers from positional blurring.
Gaming C-
Minimal environmental definition provides only general audio cues. Suitable for games where positioning isn't critical.

Tangzu Chang Le Scorings

Average Technical & Tuning Grades

Average Tunign Grade

C+
  • Generally enjoyable tonal character with some noticeable unevenness. Maintains listenability while showing room for refinement in frequency balance.

Average Technical Grade

C
  • Limited resolution; finer nuances are masked. Soundstage feels narrow, and complex passages cause muddiness. Transitions lack finesse.
Bass C-
Subdued bass response that stays mostly in the background. Lacks energy and impact but maintains basic definition.
Mids C+
Decent midrange performance - balanced but unremarkable. Adequate clarity for most genres without notable flaws.
Treble C-
Average treble performance - present but lacking refinement. Some graininess or splashiness affects clarity.
Soundstage C-
Average soundstage - adequate width but flat presentation. Reasonable instrument separation but lacks layering and depth.
Details C
Average resolution - reveals basic elements but misses subtleties. Satisfactory for casual listening but lacks refinement.
Imaging C-
Average imaging - reasonable localization but lacks specificity. Instruments have general positions but lack pinpoint accuracy.
Gaming C
Minimal environmental definition provides only general audio cues. Suitable for games where positioning isn't critical.

CCA CRA Reviews

Super* Review 6* * score normalized
check links for more info:

Super* Review original ranking

Super* Review Youtube Channel
- Super* Review
Ad
Using this affiliate link for ordering your CCA CRA or any other IEM helps fund our free service at no extra cost to you.

Price: $15

Buy CCA CRA on Linsoul
Tim Tuned 5 Reviewer Score
C+ Tuning
B Tech
Fun, well tuned v-shape signature Details & Stage

Tim Tuned original ranking

Tim Tuned Youtube Channel
- Tim Tuned
Bass: A- Mids: A- Treble: A-
Precogvision 4.2 Reviewer Score
C Tuning
C- Tech
High-clarity, potentially fatiguing sound with surprisingly good bass and treble extension.

Precogvision original ranking

Precogvision Youtube Channel
- Precogvision
Bass: B Mids: C- Treble: C- Dynamics: C+ Details: C- Imaging: D
Nymz 3.3 Reviewer Score
D Tuning
D Tech
Insane value. Still a bassy KZ, but for 15$, hard not to rec. Punches at higher price bracket, but still has 4.5k and 8k peaks for my library. I recomend EQing it - turns it into a beast for the price.

Nymz original ranking

Nymz Website

- Nymz
Bass: C- Mids: D Treble: D Details: D Imaging: D
Audionotions 3 Reviewer Score
Big bass, big treble. A bit too spicy for my tastes Previously Owned

Audionotions original ranking

Website (Audionotions)

- Audionotions

Tangzu Chang Le Reviews

Shuwa-T 4.3 Reviewer Score
C- Tuning
C- Tech
check links for more info:

Shuwa-T original ranking

Shuwa-T Website

- Shuwa-T
Bass: C- Mids: C+ Treble: C- Soundstage: C- Details: C Imaging: C-
Jays Audio 4 Reviewer Score
B+ Tuning
C+ Tech
The closest v-shape to the OG MH755/750

Jays Audio original ranking

Jays Audio Youtube Channel
- Jays Audio

CCA CRA User Reviews

Example User Posted on ...
0.0

"This is an example review"

Pros
  • Example pro 1
  • Example pro 2
Cons
  • Example con 1
  • Example con 2
No User-Reviews Yet

Share your experience and build your personal ranking list.

You need to be signed in to write your own review

Tangzu Chang Le User Reviews

Example User Posted on ...
0.0

"This is an example review"

Pros
  • Example pro 1
  • Example pro 2
Cons
  • Example con 1
  • Example con 2
No User-Reviews Yet

Share your experience and build your personal ranking list.

You need to be signed in to write your own review

Find your next IEM:

IEM Finder Quiz

new
Use this quiz and answer a few questions to get your individual IEM recommendation list
(1/2) How much are you willing to spend on the IEM?
(2/2) Which sound characteristics are particularly important to you?

Footer