CCA CRA VS KZ EDX Pro

IEM Comparison: Expert & Community Scores Side-by-Side

Home Ranking Compare IEMs

CCA CRA and KZ EDX Pro use 1DD and 2DD driver setups respectively. CCA CRA costs $14 while KZ EDX Pro costs $15. KZ EDX Pro is $1 more expensive. KZ EDX Pro holds a clear 0.7-point edge in reviewer scores (4.6 vs 5.3). CCA CRA has significantly better bass with a 1.7-point edge, CCA CRA has significantly better mids with a 1.7-point edge, CCA CRA has significantly better treble with a 1.7-point edge, CCA CRA has significantly better dynamics with a 1-point edge and CCA CRA has better details with a 0.5-point edge.

Insights

Metric CCA CRA KZ EDX Pro
Bass 5.7 4
Mids 4.7 3
Treble 4.7 3
Details 3.5 3
Imaging 3 3
Dynamics 5 4
Tonality 4.4 3.3
Technicalities 4.3 3.3
Take these comparisons with a grain of salt—we don't have enough KZ EDX Pro reviews saved yet to provide an unbiased result.

CCA CRA Aggregated Review Score

Average Reviewer Scores

Average Reviewer Score:

4.6

Generally Unfavorable


KZ EDX Pro Aggregated Review Score

Average Reviewer Scores

Average Reviewer Score:

5.3

Mixed to Negative


Reviews Comparison

CCA CRA reviewed by Precogvision

Precogvision 4.2 Reviewer Score
C Tuning
C- Tech
High-clarity, potentially fatiguing sound with surprisingly good bass and treble extension.

Precogvision original ranking

Precogvision Youtube Channel
Bass: B Mids: C- Treble: C- Dynamics: C+ Details: C- Imaging: D

KZ EDX Pro reviewed by Precogvision

Precogvision 3.2 Reviewer Score
D Tuning
D Tech
Surprisingly extended treble and good bass dynamics for the price. Just crappy tuning per usual.

Precogvision original ranking

Precogvision Youtube Channel
Bass: C- Mids: D Treble: D Dynamics: C- Details: D Imaging: D

CCA CRA reviewed by Head-Fi.org

Head-Fi.org 7.2 * score rescaled + normalized
29 community members have rated the CCA CRA at an average of 3.9/5 on Head-Fi. Overall sentiment: Strongly Favorable.

URL to full Review

Head-Fi.org original ranking

KZ EDX Pro reviewed by Head-Fi.org

Head-Fi.org 6.7 * score rescaled + normalized
5 community members have rated the KZ EDX Pro at an average of 3.6/5 on Head-Fi. Overall sentiment: Generally Favorable.

URL to full Review

Head-Fi.org original ranking

CCA CRA (more reviews)

CCA CRA reviewed by Tim Tuned

Tim Tuned 5 Reviewer Score
C+ Tuning
B Tech
Fun, well tuned v-shape signature Details & Stage

Tim Tuned original ranking

Tim Tuned Youtube Channel
Bass: A- Mids: A- Treble: A-

CCA CRA reviewed by Kois Archive

Kois Archive 3.6 Reviewer Score
C Tuning
C- Tech

CCA CRA reviewed by Nymz

Nymz 3.3 Reviewer Score
D Tuning
D Tech
Insane value. Still a bassy KZ, but for 15$, hard not to rec. Punches at higher price bracket, but still has 4.5k and 8k peaks for my library. I recomend EQing it - turns it into a beast for the price.

Nymz original ranking

Nymz Website

Bass: C- Mids: D Treble: D Details: D Imaging: D

CCA CRA reviewed by Audionotions

Audionotions 3 Reviewer Score
Big bass, big treble. A bit too spicy for my tastes

Audionotions original ranking

Website (Audionotions)

CCA CRA User Review Score

Average User Scores

Average User Score: n/a

Based on 0 user reviews

No user reviews yet. Be the first one who writes a review!

KZ EDX Pro User Review Score

Average User Scores

Average User Score: n/a

Based on 0 user reviews

No user reviews yet. Be the first one who writes a review!

CCA CRA Gaming Score

Gaming Score & Grade

  • The gaming score is prioritizing technical capabilities of the IEM (Separation, Layering, Soundstage) and good value.

Gaming Score

4.4

Gaming Grade

C-

KZ EDX Pro Gaming Score

Gaming Score & Grade

  • The gaming score is prioritizing technical capabilities of the IEM (Separation, Layering, Soundstage) and good value.

Gaming Score

3.3

Gaming Grade

D

CCA CRA Scorings

Average Technical & Tuning Grades

Average Tunign Grade

C-
  • Uneven emphasis across the spectrum keeps the presentation unsettled and awkward. Acoustic instruments lose their natural body.

Average Technical Grade

C-
  • Even moderate complexity exposes the limited resolution and narrow sense of space. Technical fans will find it lacking.
Bass B-
It delivers adequate punch and texture, though nothing stands out. Sub-bass presence is hinted rather than delivered.
Mids C
Midrange is passable yet unrefined, revealing grain and occasional harshness. It sounds a bit grainy on detailed recordings.
Treble C
The top end sounds acceptable but lacks the smoothness of higher tiers. Air is hinted at more than delivered.
Dynamics C+
You get reliable macrodynamics, with micro shifts that remain only adequate. A reliable performer for most tracks.
Details D+
Textural clues dull down, robbing strings and vocals of their natural grit. You hear outlines rather than textures.
Imaging D
Modest imaging with basic left/right positioning that never quite nails the center image. Left/right cues exist but are rough.
Gaming C-
Minimal environmental definition provides only general audio cues. Suitable for games where positioning isn't critical.

KZ EDX Pro Scorings

Average Technical & Tuning Grades

Average Tunign Grade

D
  • The tuning lacks refinement, jumping between dull and shouty without settling. Vocals frequently sound off-kilter.

Average Technical Grade

D
  • Even moderate complexity exposes the limited resolution and narrow sense of space. Technical fans will find it lacking.
Bass C-
Bass stays subdued, content to hover in the background. It keeps things tidy, yet unremarkable.
Mids D
Midrange is highly uneven, veering between shouty peaks and hollow dips. Tonality swings between shouty and withdrawn.
Treble D
Highs feel erratic, with dips and spikes that make the signature unpredictable. It alternates between splashy and dull.
Dynamics C-
Dynamics are average—competent yet lacking real excitement. It keeps music listenable but uninspiring.
Details D
It can follow the main lines but loses composure once arrangements become busy. Fine articulation is frequently glossed over.
Imaging D
It sketches positions loosely while allowing outlines to blur. Instrument outlines remain fuzzy.
Gaming D
Compromised imaging significantly impacts gameplay awareness. Directional cues often lack accuracy or consistency.

CCA CRA User Reviews

Example User Posted on ...
0.0

"This is an example review"

Pros
  • Example pro 1
  • Example pro 2
Cons
  • Example con 1
  • Example con 2
No User-Reviews Yet

Share your experience and build your personal ranking list.

You need to be signed in to write your own review

KZ EDX Pro User Reviews

Example User Posted on ...
0.0

"This is an example review"

Pros
  • Example pro 1
  • Example pro 2
Cons
  • Example con 1
  • Example con 2
No User-Reviews Yet

Share your experience and build your personal ranking list.

You need to be signed in to write your own review

Find your next IEM:

IEM Finder Quiz

new
Use this quiz and answer a few questions to get your individual IEM recommendation list
(1/3) How much are you willing to spend on the IEM?
(2/3) Which sound characteristics are particularly important to you?
(3/3) Which tuning do you prefer?
You can select multiple options.
Buy

Footer