KZ EDX Pro VS Tangzu Chang Le

IEM Comparison: Expert & Community Scores Side-by-Side

IEMRanking.com Home Compare IEMs

KZ EDX Pro and Tangzu Chang Le are in-ear monitors. KZ EDX Pro costs $15 while Tangzu Chang Le costs $15. KZ EDX Pro holds a slight 0.4-point edge in reviewer scores (4.6 vs 4.2). Tangzu Chang Le has significantly better mids with a 2-point edge, Tangzu Chang Le has significantly better treble with a 1-point edge, Tangzu Chang Le has significantly better details with a 1.5-point edge and Tangzu Chang Le has significantly better imaging with a 1-point edge.

Insights

Metric KZ EDX Pro Tangzu Chang Le
Bass 4 4
Mids 3 5
Treble 3 4
Details 3 4.5
Soundstage 4.6 4
Imaging 3 4
Dynamics 4 4.2
Tonality 3.3 5.4
Technicalities 3.3 4.6

KZ EDX Pro Aggregated Review Score

Average Reviewer Scores

Precogvision
Super* Review

Average Reviewer Score:

4.6

Generally Unfavorable


Tangzu Chang Le Aggregated Review Score

Average Reviewer Scores

Shuwa-T Jays Audio

Average Reviewer Score:

4.2

Unfavorable


KZ EDX Pro User Review Score

Average User Scores

Average User Score: n/a

Based on 0 user reviews

No user reviews yet. Be the first one who writes a review!

Tangzu Chang Le User Review Score

Average User Scores

Average User Score: n/a

Based on 0 user reviews

No user reviews yet. Be the first one who writes a review!

KZ EDX Pro Gaming Score

Gaming Score & Grade

  • The gaming score is prioritizing technical capabilities of the IEM (Separation, Layering, Soundstage) and good value.

Gaming Score

3.3

Gaming Grade

D

Tangzu Chang Le Gaming Score

Gaming Score & Grade

  • The gaming score is prioritizing technical capabilities of the IEM (Separation, Layering, Soundstage) and good value.

Gaming Score

4.8

Gaming Grade

C

KZ EDX Pro Scorings

Average Technical & Tuning Grades

Average Tunign Grade

D
  • Significantly flawed tuning. Noticeable frequency imbalances and unnatural timbre distract from music. Lacks versatility across recordings.

Average Technical Grade

D
  • Limited resolution; finer nuances are masked. Soundstage feels narrow, and complex passages cause muddiness. Transitions lack finesse.
Bass C-
Subdued bass response that stays mostly in the background. Lacks energy and impact but maintains basic definition.
Mids D
Midrange is significantly uneven with coloration. Some frequencies are boosted while others are missing, creating an unnatural tone.
Treble D
Uneven treble response with noticeable peaks and dips. Can sound both dull and occasionally harsh simultaneously.
Dynamics C-
Average dynamics - passable but unexciting. Transients are rounded and micro-dynamics lack refinement.
Details D
Modest detail presentation with significant loss of texture. Nuances are masked and complex passages become congested.
Imaging D
Modest imaging with basic left/right positioning. Lacks precision for center placement and suffers from positional blurring.
Gaming D
Compromised imaging significantly impacts gameplay awareness. Directional cues often lack accuracy or consistency.

Tangzu Chang Le Scorings

Average Technical & Tuning Grades

Average Tunign Grade

C+
  • Generally enjoyable tonal character with some noticeable unevenness. Maintains listenability while showing room for refinement in frequency balance.

Average Technical Grade

C
  • Limited resolution; finer nuances are masked. Soundstage feels narrow, and complex passages cause muddiness. Transitions lack finesse.
Bass C-
Subdued bass response that stays mostly in the background. Lacks energy and impact but maintains basic definition.
Mids C+
Decent midrange performance - balanced but unremarkable. Adequate clarity for most genres without notable flaws.
Treble C-
Average treble performance - present but lacking refinement. Some graininess or splashiness affects clarity.
Soundstage C-
Average soundstage - adequate width but flat presentation. Reasonable instrument separation but lacks layering and depth.
Details C
Average resolution - reveals basic elements but misses subtleties. Satisfactory for casual listening but lacks refinement.
Imaging C-
Average imaging - reasonable localization but lacks specificity. Instruments have general positions but lack pinpoint accuracy.
Gaming C
Minimal environmental definition provides only general audio cues. Suitable for games where positioning isn't critical.

KZ EDX Pro Reviews

Super* Review 6* * score normalized
Ad
Using this affiliate link for ordering your KZ EDX Pro or any other IEM helps fund our free service at no extra cost to you.

Price: $10.99

Buy KZ EDX Pro on Linsoul
Precogvision 3.2 Reviewer Score
D Tuning
D Tech
Surprisingly extended treble and good bass dynamics for the price. Just crappy tuning per usual.

Precogvision original ranking

Precogvision Youtube Channel
- Precogvision
Bass: C- Mids: D Treble: D Dynamics: C- Details: D Imaging: D

Tangzu Chang Le Reviews

Shuwa-T 4.3 Reviewer Score
C- Tuning
C- Tech
check links for more info:

Shuwa-T original ranking

Shuwa-T Website

- Shuwa-T
Bass: C- Mids: C+ Treble: C- Soundstage: C- Details: C Imaging: C-
Jays Audio 4 Reviewer Score
B+ Tuning
C+ Tech
The closest v-shape to the OG MH755/750

Jays Audio original ranking

Jays Audio Youtube Channel
- Jays Audio

KZ EDX Pro User Reviews

Example User Posted on ...
0.0

"This is an example review"

Pros
  • Example pro 1
  • Example pro 2
Cons
  • Example con 1
  • Example con 2
No User-Reviews Yet

Share your experience and build your personal ranking list.

You need to be signed in to write your own review

Tangzu Chang Le User Reviews

Example User Posted on ...
0.0

"This is an example review"

Pros
  • Example pro 1
  • Example pro 2
Cons
  • Example con 1
  • Example con 2
No User-Reviews Yet

Share your experience and build your personal ranking list.

You need to be signed in to write your own review

Find your next IEM:

IEM Finder Quiz

new
Use this quiz and answer a few questions to get your individual IEM recommendation list
(1/2) How much are you willing to spend on the IEM?
(2/2) Which sound characteristics are particularly important to you?

Footer