ND x12 VS Apos x Community Rock Lobster

IEM Comparison: Expert & Community Scores Side-by-Side

Home Ranking Compare IEMs

ND x12 and Apos x Community Rock Lobster are in-ear monitors. ND x12 costs $50 while Apos x Community Rock Lobster costs $60. Apos x Community Rock Lobster is $10 more expensive. Apos x Community Rock Lobster holds a decisive 1.8-point edge in reviewer scores (4.5 vs 6.3). Apos x Community Rock Lobster has significantly better mids with a 2-point edge, Apos x Community Rock Lobster has significantly better treble with a 2-point edge, Apos x Community Rock Lobster has significantly better dynamics with a 3-point edge and Apos x Community Rock Lobster has slightly better soundstage with a 0.4-point edge.

Insights

Metric ND x12 Apos x Community Rock Lobster
Mids 4 6
Treble 3 5
Soundstage 6 6.4
Dynamics 4 7
Tonality 4.5 6.1
Technicalities 3 5
Take these comparisons with a grain of salt—we don't have enough ND x12 and Apos x Community Rock Lobster reviews saved yet to provide an unbiased result.

ND x12 Aggregated Review Score

Average Reviewer Scores

Jaytiss Head-Fi.org

Average Reviewer Score:

4.5

Generally Unfavorable


Apos x Community Rock Lobster Aggregated Review Score

Average Reviewer Scores

Z-Reviews
Jaytiss

Average Reviewer Score:

6.3

Mixed to Positive


Reviews Comparison

ND x12 reviewed by Jaytiss

Jaytiss 4.5 Reviewer Score
C Tuning
D Tech
Cool Design, it's a bit treble forward.

Jaytiss original ranking

Jaytiss Youtube Channel
Mids: C- Treble: D Dynamics: C- Soundstage: B

Apos x Community Rock Lobster reviewed by Jaytiss

2025-10-11
Jaytiss 7.1 Reviewer Score
B Tuning
C+ Tech
Has some slight colorizations, but is fun and rich.

Jaytiss original ranking

Jaytiss Youtube Channel
Mids: B Treble: C+ Dynamics: A- Soundstage: B

ND x12 (more reviews)

ND x12 reviewed by Head-Fi.org

Head-Fi.org 4.5 * score rescaled + normalized
2 community members have rated the ND X12 at an average of 2.5/5 on Head-Fi. Overall sentiment: Mixed to Negative.

URL to full Review

Head-Fi.org original ranking

Apos x Community Rock Lobster (more reviews)

Apos x Community Rock Lobster reviewed by Z-Reviews

2025-10-13
Z-Reviews 5.5 * score rescaled + normalized

ND x12 User Review Score

Average User Scores

Average User Score: n/a

Based on 0 user reviews

No user reviews yet. Be the first one who writes a review!

Apos x Community Rock Lobster User Review Score

Average User Scores

Average User Score: n/a

Based on 0 user reviews

No user reviews yet. Be the first one who writes a review!

ND x12 Gaming Score

Gaming Score & Grade

  • The gaming score is prioritizing technical capabilities of the IEM (Separation, Layering, Soundstage) and good value.

Gaming Score

3.5

Gaming Grade

D+

Apos x Community Rock Lobster Gaming Score

Gaming Score & Grade

  • The gaming score is prioritizing technical capabilities of the IEM (Separation, Layering, Soundstage) and good value.

Gaming Score

5.3

Gaming Grade

C+

ND x12 Scorings

Average Technical & Tuning Grades

Average Tunign Grade

C
  • The tuning lacks refinement, jumping between dull and shouty without settling. Vocals frequently sound off-kilter.

Average Technical Grade

D
  • Details smear quickly, leaving the presentation cramped and low on definition. You'll notice smearing on even moderately layered songs.
Mids C-
The region is listenable but lacks the finesse and clarity of better tuning. A touch of EQ can smooth things out.
Treble D
Highs feel erratic, with dips and spikes that make the signature unpredictable. It alternates between splashy and dull.
Dynamics C-
It maintains a steady dynamic profile that neither offends nor inspires. Swells arrive but lack drama.
Soundstage B
A satisfying balance of width and depth yields a stage that feels organized and engaging. Imaging lines up with the intended mix.
Gaming D+
Compromised imaging significantly impacts gameplay awareness. Directional cues often lack accuracy or consistency.

Apos x Community Rock Lobster Scorings

Average Technical & Tuning Grades

Average Tunign Grade

B
  • Tonality is generally agreeable, though a few bumps remind you of its limits. Certain tracks spotlight its tonal quirks.

Average Technical Grade

C+
  • It offers a competent showing, maintaining cohesion on straightforward arrangements. Complex passages start to challenge it, but never derail the show.
Mids B
Expect a confident midrange that keeps details audible without harshness. Acoustic arrangements sound engaging.
Treble C+
Treble is decent, offering acceptable extension without harshness. It balances presence with a touch of restraint.
Dynamics A-
The system snaps into action with precision, highlighting every swell. Recordings feel energetic and alive.
Soundstage B
The presentation supplies a believable venue outline where each instrument owns its pocket of space. The stage opens up nicely for live cuts.
Gaming C+
Fundamental left/right positioning with limited depth perception. Works for non-competitive gaming but lacks precision.

ND x12 User Reviews

Example User Posted on ...
0.0

"This is an example review"

Pros
  • Example pro 1
  • Example pro 2
Cons
  • Example con 1
  • Example con 2
No User-Reviews Yet

Share your experience and build your personal ranking list.

You need to be signed in to write your own review

Apos x Community Rock Lobster User Reviews

Example User Posted on ...
0.0

"This is an example review"

Pros
  • Example pro 1
  • Example pro 2
Cons
  • Example con 1
  • Example con 2
No User-Reviews Yet

Share your experience and build your personal ranking list.

You need to be signed in to write your own review

Find your next IEM:

IEM Finder Quiz

new
Use this quiz and answer a few questions to get your individual IEM recommendation list
(1/3) How much are you willing to spend on the IEM?
(2/3) Which sound characteristics are particularly important to you?
(3/3) Which tuning do you prefer?
You can select multiple options.

Footer