ND x12 - Reviews & Ratings

2 Reviews (C Tier | 4.5/10)

Home ND x12

Summary

Based on 2 reviews, the ND x12 is drawing mixed impressions from reviewers, with opinions often splitting along personal preferences.

Average Reviewer Scores

Average Reviewer Score:

4.5

Generally Unfavorable

Average User Scores

Average User Score: n/a

Based on 0 user reviews

No user reviews yet. Be the first one who writes a review!

Gaming Score & Grade

  • The gaming score is prioritizing technical capabilities of the IEM (Separation, Layering, Soundstage) and good value.

Gaming Score

3.5

Gaming Grade

D+

Reviews

Reviewed by: Jaytiss

Jaytiss 4.5 Reviewer Score
C Tuning
D Tech
Cool Design, it's a bit treble forward.

Jaytiss original ranking

Jaytiss Youtube Channel
Mids: C- Treble: D Dynamics: C- Soundstage: B

Reviewed by: Head-Fi.org

Head-Fi.org 4.5 * score rescaled + normalized
2 community members have rated the ND X12 at an average of 2.5/5 on Head-Fi. Overall sentiment: Mixed to Negative.

URL to full Review

Head-Fi.org original ranking

ND x12 Infos

Discuss ND x12 with the community

Start an official forum discussion for this IEM. We'll create a new thread titled "ND x12 discussion thread" in our IEM Discussion Threads.

Compare ND x12 to popular alternatives

Take this comparison with a grain of salt—we don't have enough ND x12 reviews saved yet to provide an unbiased result.
Compare two IEMs side by side
Name

VS

Name
IEM alt. Score
ND x12 vs. KZ Zenith
KZ Zenith offers better mids, treble and dynamics.
6.8
ND x12 vs. KZ AM16
KZ AM16 offers better treble, mids and dynamics.
6.8
ND x12 vs. Tin Hifi C3 MK2
Tin Hifi C3 MK2 offers better treble, mids and dynamics.
6.6
ND x12 vs. Tin Hifi C3
Similar overall performance.
6.5
ND x12 vs. Juzear Clear
Juzear Clear offers better mids, treble and dynamics.
6.4
ND x12 vs. Kbear KB02
Kbear KB02 offers better treble, dynamics and mids.
6.4
ND x12 vs. CCZ CZ10
CCZ CZ10 offers better treble, dynamics and mids.
6.4
ND x12 vs. 7hz Sonus
7hz Sonus offers better mids and treble.
6.3
ND x12 vs. Astrotec GX100
Astrotec GX100 offers better treble, mids and dynamics.
6.3
ND x12 vs. Apos x Community Rock Lobster
Apos x Community Rock Lobster offers better dynamics, mids and treble.
6.3
Best IEMs from $50 - $100

IEM Finder Quiz

new
Use this quiz and answer a few questions to get your individual IEM recommendation list
(1/3) How much are you willing to spend on the IEM?
(2/3) Which sound characteristics are particularly important to you?
(3/3) Which tuning do you prefer?
You can select multiple options.

Average Technical & Tuning Grades

Average Tunign Grade

C
  • The tuning lacks refinement, jumping between dull and shouty without settling. Vocals frequently sound off-kilter.

Average Technical Grade

D
  • Details smear quickly, leaving the presentation cramped and low on definition. You'll notice smearing on even moderately layered songs.
Mids C-
The region is listenable but lacks the finesse and clarity of better tuning. A touch of EQ can smooth things out.
Treble D
Highs feel erratic, with dips and spikes that make the signature unpredictable. It alternates between splashy and dull.
Dynamics C-
It maintains a steady dynamic profile that neither offends nor inspires. Swells arrive but lack drama.
Soundstage B
A satisfying balance of width and depth yields a stage that feels organized and engaging. Imaging lines up with the intended mix.
Gaming D+
Compromised imaging significantly impacts gameplay awareness. Directional cues often lack accuracy or consistency.

User Reviews

Example User Posted on ...
0.0

"This is an example review"

Pros
  • Example pro 1
  • Example pro 2
Cons
  • Example con 1
  • Example con 2
No User-Reviews Yet

Share your experience and build your personal ranking list.

Footer