Binary Dynaquattro VS qdc x FitEar Superior EX

IEM Comparison: Expert & Community Scores Side-by-Side

IEMRanking.com Home Compare IEMs

Binary Dynaquattro and qdc x FitEar Superior EX use 4DD and 1DD driver setups respectively. Binary Dynaquattro costs $260 while qdc x FitEar Superior EX costs $235. Binary Dynaquattro is $25 more expensive. Binary Dynaquattro holds a decisive 2.2-point edge in reviewer scores (7.4 vs 5.1). Binary Dynaquattro has better mids with a 0.5-point edge, Binary Dynaquattro has significantly better treble with a 1-point edge, Binary Dynaquattro has significantly better dynamics with a 2.8-point edge and Binary Dynaquattro has significantly better soundstage with a 2-point edge.

Insights

Metric Binary Dynaquattro qdc x FitEar Superior EX
Bass 7.4 5
Mids 6 5.5
Treble 6 5
Details 7.4 4.8
Soundstage 7 5
Imaging 7.4 5.3
Dynamics 8 5.3
Tonality 7.1 5.2
Technicalities 6.8 5.1

Binary Dynaquattro Aggregated Review Score

Average Reviewer Scores

Jaytiss Gizaudio Axel Z-Reviews Jays Audio

Average Reviewer Score:

7.4

Generally Favorable


qdc x FitEar Superior EX Aggregated Review Score

Average Reviewer Scores

Shuwa-T Precogvision
Smirk Audio

Average Reviewer Score:

5.1

Mixed to Negative


Binary Dynaquattro User Review Score

Average User Scores

Average User Score: n/a

Based on 0 user reviews

No user reviews yet. Be the first one who writes a review!

qdc x FitEar Superior EX User Review Score

Average User Scores

Average User Score: n/a

Based on 0 user reviews

No user reviews yet. Be the first one who writes a review!

Binary Dynaquattro Gaming Score

Gaming Score & Grade

  • The gaming score is prioritizing technical capabilities of the IEM (Separation, Layering, Soundstage) and good value.

Gaming Score

6.9

Gaming Grade

B+

qdc x FitEar Superior EX Gaming Score

Gaming Score & Grade

  • The gaming score is prioritizing technical capabilities of the IEM (Separation, Layering, Soundstage) and good value.

Gaming Score

5.1

Gaming Grade

C+

Binary Dynaquattro Scorings

Average Technical & Tuning Grades

Average Tunign Grade

A-
  • Pleasing tonal balance with good technical control. Minor quirks present but not distracting. Demonstrates decent genre versatility.

Average Technical Grade

B+
  • Satisfactory technical performance. Handles basic detail retrieval adequately in most tracks. Maintains reasonable cohesion in simpler arrangements.
Mids B
Good midrange presence with solid clarity. Vocals are clear and instruments have reasonable texture and body.
Treble B
Good treble response - clear and detailed without fatigue. Well-extended with proper air and sparkle.
Dynamics A+
Superb dynamic range - powerful yet nuanced. Exceptional transient response with lifelike impact and subtle volume gradations.
Soundstage A-
Excellent spatial presentation - wide, deep and tall. Precise instrument placement with clear separation in all dimensions.
Gaming B+
Respectable environmental presentation favors atmosphere over precision. Detects obvious directional cues while conveying game world ambiance. Value-to-cost may not be optimal for gaming-focused users.

qdc x FitEar Superior EX Scorings

Average Technical & Tuning Grades

Average Tunign Grade

C+
  • Generally enjoyable tonal character with some noticeable unevenness. Maintains listenability while showing room for refinement in frequency balance.

Average Technical Grade

C+
  • Satisfactory technical performance. Handles basic detail retrieval adequately in most tracks. Maintains reasonable cohesion in simpler arrangements.
Bass C+
Average bass performance - present but unremarkable. Has reasonable texture but lacks depth and physicality.
Mids B-
Decent midrange performance - balanced but unremarkable. Adequate clarity for most genres without notable flaws.
Treble C+
Decent treble with acceptable extension and detail. Can sound slightly unrefined but avoids being harsh or sibilant.
Dynamics C+
Decent dynamic performance. Good macro-contrast but micro-dynamics could be more nuanced. Satisfactory impact.
Soundstage C+
Decent spatial presentation with noticeable width. Some depth perception but height dimension remains underdeveloped.
Details C
Average resolution - reveals basic elements but misses subtleties. Satisfactory for casual listening but lacks refinement.
Imaging C+
Decent positional accuracy. Good left/right placement with acceptable center image, though depth positioning is approximate.
Gaming C+
Fundamental left/right positioning with limited depth perception. Works for non-competitive gaming but lacks precision.

Binary Dynaquattro Reviews

Reviewed by: Jaytiss

Jaytiss 7.8 Reviewer Score
B+ Tuning
B Tech
It has great tuning, but lack serverly in some areas. Very fun.

Jaytiss original ranking

Jaytiss Youtube Channel
Mids: B Treble: B Dynamics: A+ Soundstage: A-
Ad
Using this affiliate link for ordering your Binary Dynaquattro or any other IEM helps fund our free service at no extra cost to you.

Price: $194.99

Buy Binary Dynaquattro on HiFiGO

Reviewed by: Gizaudio Axel

Gizaudio Axel 7.5 Reviewer Score
A- Tuning
A- Tech
Shines when driven properly. Excellent bass, vocal-forward tuning, and natural timbre. Hard to drive, could use more treble extension.

Gizaudio Axel original ranking

Gizaudio Axel Youtube Channel

Reviewed by: Z-Reviews

Z-Reviews 7.2 * score normalized

Reviewed by: Jays Audio

Jays Audio 7 Reviewer Score
A Tuning
A Tech
Natural vocals, good treble extension, bass is tight and more resolving vs 61t and Davinci. Overall very well balanced and clean. There are some small peaks at 8-10k and 15-20K which can be an issue on some songs, and there is masking around 4-8k region, but overall, solid all-rounder.

Jays Audio original ranking

Jays Audio Youtube Channel

qdc x FitEar Superior EX Reviews

Reviewed by: Smirk Audio

Smirk Audio 6.9 Reviewer Score
A- Tuning
B+ Tech
check links for more info:

Smirk Audio original ranking

Smirk Audio Head-Fi Profile

Bass: A Mids: A Treble: B+ Dynamics: B+ Details: B+ Imaging: A-

Reviewed by: Shuwa-T

Shuwa-T 4.5 Reviewer Score
C- Tuning
C Tech
check links for more info:

Shuwa-T original ranking

Shuwa-T Website

Bass: D+ Mids: C+ Treble: C Soundstage: C+ Details: C- Imaging: C+

Reviewed by: Precogvision

Precogvision 4 Reviewer Score
C- Tuning
C- Tech
Lower half of tuning sounds extremely muddy, midrange is muffled, and treble lacks extension past 10kHz. Nothing superior about this.

Precogvision original ranking

Precogvision Youtube Channel
Bass: C- Mids: C- Treble: C- Dynamics: C- Details: C- Imaging: C-

Binary Dynaquattro User Reviews

Example User Posted on ...
0.0

"This is an example review"

Pros
  • Example pro 1
  • Example pro 2
Cons
  • Example con 1
  • Example con 2
No User-Reviews Yet

Share your experience and build your personal ranking list.

You need to be signed in to write your own review

qdc x FitEar Superior EX User Reviews

Example User Posted on ...
0.0

"This is an example review"

Pros
  • Example pro 1
  • Example pro 2
Cons
  • Example con 1
  • Example con 2
No User-Reviews Yet

Share your experience and build your personal ranking list.

You need to be signed in to write your own review

Find your next IEM:

IEM Finder Quiz

new
Use this quiz and answer a few questions to get your individual IEM recommendation list
(1/2) How much are you willing to spend on the IEM?
(2/2) Which sound characteristics are particularly important to you?

Footer