qdc x FitEar Superior EX - Reviews & Ratings
4 Reviews (B Tier | 6/10)
Home
qdc x FitEar Superior EX
Summary
Based on 4 reviews, the qdc x FitEar Superior EX is a decent choice according to reviewers, who see it as a safe recommendation for general listening.
Average Reviewer Scores
Average Reviewer Score:
6Mixed
Average User Scores
Average User Score: n/a
Based on 0 user reviews
No user reviews yet. Be the first one who writes a review!
Gaming Score & Grade
- The gaming score is prioritizing technical capabilities of the IEM (Separation, Layering, Soundstage) and good value.
Gaming Score
5.1Gaming Grade
C+qdc x FitEar Superior EX Details
Driver Configuration: 1DD
Tuning Type: Neutral with Bass Boost
Brand: QDC Top QDC IEMs
Price (Msrp): $235
Support our free service! Buying through our affiliate links costs you nothing extra:
Reviews
Reviewed by: Smirk Audio
6.9
Reviewer Score
A-
Tuning
B+
Tech
check links for more info:
Bass: A
Mids: A
Treble: B+
Dynamics: B+
Details: B+
Imaging: A-
Reviewed by: Shuwa-T
4.5
Reviewer Score
C-
Tuning
C
Tech
check links for more info:
Bass: D+
Mids: C+
Treble: C
Soundstage: C+
Details: C-
Imaging: C+
Reviewed by: Precogvision
4
Reviewer Score
C-
Tuning
C-
Tech
Lower half of tuning sounds extremely muddy, midrange is muffled, and treble lacks extension past 10kHz. Nothing superior about this.
Precogvision Youtube Channel
Precogvision Youtube Channel
Bass: C-
Mids: C-
Treble: C-
Dynamics: C-
Details: C-
Imaging: C-
Reviewed by: Head-Fi.org
8.5
* score rescaled + normalized
2 community members have rated the qdc x FitEar Superior EX at an average of 4.5/5 on Head-Fi. Overall sentiment: Outstanding.
Tools
IEM Finder Quiz
new
Use this quiz and answer a few questions to get your individual IEM recommendation list
(1/3) How much are you willing to spend on the IEM?
(2/3) Which sound characteristics are particularly important to you?
(3/3) Which tuning do you prefer?
You can select multiple options.
qdc x FitEar Superior EX Infos
Discuss qdc x FitEar Superior EX with the community
Start an official forum discussion for this IEM. We'll create a new thread titled "qdc x FitEar Superior EX discussion thread" in our IEM Discussion Threads.
Compare qdc x FitEar Superior EX to popular alternatives
Take this comparison with a grain of salt—we don't have enough qdc x FitEar Superior EX reviews saved yet to provide an unbiased result.
Compare two IEMs side by side
Name
VS
Name
| IEM | alt. Score |
|---|---|
|
qdc x FitEar Superior EX vs. Aful Performer 5+2
Aful Performer 5+2 offers better bass, soundstage and details.
|
7.7 |
|
qdc x FitEar Superior EX vs. Ziigaat Odyssey
Ziigaat Odyssey offers better mids, bass and soundstage.
|
7.7 |
|
qdc x FitEar Superior EX vs. ZiiGaat Crescent
ZiiGaat Crescent offers better bass, treble and soundstage.
|
7.5 |
|
qdc x FitEar Superior EX vs. MYER SL224
MYER SL224 offers better details, bass and dynamics.
|
7.5 |
|
qdc x FitEar Superior EX vs. Gizaudio x Binary Chopin
Gizaudio x Binary Chopin offers better details, bass and dynamics.
|
7.5 |
|
qdc x FitEar Superior EX vs. Simgot ET142
Similar overall performance.
|
7.4 |
|
qdc x FitEar Superior EX vs. ZiiGaat Arete x Fresh Reviews
ZiiGaat Arete x Fresh Reviews offers better soundstage, dynamics and mids.
|
7.4 |
|
qdc x FitEar Superior EX vs. Binary Dynaquattro
Binary Dynaquattro offers better dynamics, soundstage and treble.
|
7.4 |
|
qdc x FitEar Superior EX vs. Letshuoer Cadenza 4
Letshuoer Cadenza 4 offers better details, soundstage and imaging.
|
7.3 |
|
qdc x FitEar Superior EX vs. Crinear Meta
Crinear Meta offers better treble, details and bass.
|
7.3 |
Average Technical & Tuning Grades
Average Tunign Grade
C+- A mostly enjoyable signature keeps things listenable despite a handful of quirks. It handles most playlists without major complaints.
Average Technical Grade
C+- It offers a competent showing, maintaining cohesion on straightforward arrangements. Complex passages start to challenge it, but never derail the show.
Bass
C+
Expect a balanced but ordinary low end that avoids both extremes. Slam remains moderate and controlled.
Mids
B-
Midrange performance is decent, offering balanced presence without major flaws. It works well for casual background listening.
Treble
C+
Expect a polite treble presentation that balances presence with restraint. Percussion carries a pleasant sparkle.
Dynamics
C+
It offers fair punch and contrast, though micro-dynamics could be sharper. Impact is satisfying for day-to-day use.
Soundstage
C+
It pushes sound outward confidently while leaving height development as an unfinished idea. Height remains subtle but detectable.
Details
C
Nothing sounds offensive, yet nothing is etched sharply enough to captivate detail lovers. It's fine for casual listening sessions.
Imaging
C+
The stage feels orderly, guiding your ear across positions without confusion. Depth layering is hinted and believable.
Gaming
C+
Fundamental left/right positioning with limited depth perception. Works for non-competitive gaming but lacks precision.
User Reviews
Example User
Posted on ...
"This is an example review"
Pros
- Example pro 1
- Example pro 2
Cons
- Example con 1
- Example con 2
No User-Reviews Yet
Share your experience and build your personal ranking list.
You need to be signed in to write your own review