qdc x FitEar Superior EX - Reviews & Ratings
3 Reviews (C Tier | 5.1/10)
IEMRanking.com
Home
qdc x FitEar Superior EX
Average Reviewer Scores
Average Reviewer Score:
5.1Mixed to Negative
Average User Scores
Average User Score: n/a
Based on 0 user reviews
No user reviews yet. Be the first one who writes a review!
Gaming Score & Grade
- The gaming score is prioritizing technical capabilities of the IEM (Separation, Layering, Soundstage) and good value.
Gaming Score
5.1Gaming Grade
C+qdc x FitEar Superior EX Details
Driver Configuration: 1DD
Tuning Type: bass-boosted neutral
Brand: QDC Top QDC IEMs
Price (Msrp): $235
Support our free service! Buying through our affiliate links costs you nothing extra:
Reviews
Reviewed by: Smirk Audio
6.9
Reviewer Score
A-
Tuning
B+
Tech
check links for more info:
Bass: A
Mids: A
Treble: B+
Dynamics: B+
Details: B+
Imaging: A-
Reviewed by: Shuwa-T
4.5
Reviewer Score
C-
Tuning
C
Tech
check links for more info:
Bass: D+
Mids: C+
Treble: C
Soundstage: C+
Details: C-
Imaging: C+
Reviewed by: Precogvision
4
Reviewer Score
C-
Tuning
C-
Tech
Lower half of tuning sounds extremely muddy, midrange is muffled, and treble lacks extension past 10kHz. Nothing superior about this.
Precogvision Youtube Channel
Precogvision Youtube Channel
Bass: C-
Mids: C-
Treble: C-
Dynamics: C-
Details: C-
Imaging: C-
Tools
IEM Finder Quiz
new
Use this quiz and answer a few questions to get your individual IEM recommendation list
(1/2) How much are you willing to spend on the IEM?
(2/2) Which sound characteristics are particularly important to you?
qdc x FitEar Superior EX Infos
Compare qdc x FitEar Superior EX to popular alternatives
Compare two IEMs side by side
Name
VS
Name
| IEM | alt. Score |
|---|---|
|
qdc x FitEar Superior EX vs. Aful Performer 5+2
Aful Performer 5+2 offers better bass, soundstage and details.
|
7.7 |
|
qdc x FitEar Superior EX vs. Ziigaat Odyssey
Ziigaat Odyssey offers better mids, bass and treble.
|
7.6 |
|
qdc x FitEar Superior EX vs. Gizaudio x Binary Chopin
Gizaudio x Binary Chopin offers better details, bass and dynamics.
|
7.6 |
|
qdc x FitEar Superior EX vs. ZiiGaat Crescent
ZiiGaat Crescent offers better bass, dynamics and treble.
|
7.5 |
|
qdc x FitEar Superior EX vs. Binary Dynaquattro
Binary Dynaquattro offers better dynamics, soundstage and treble.
|
7.4 |
|
qdc x FitEar Superior EX vs. CrinEar Meta
CrinEar Meta offers better treble, details and bass.
|
7.3 |
|
qdc x FitEar Superior EX vs. DUNU x KOTO ITO
DUNU x KOTO ITO offers better bass, dynamics and details.
|
7.3 |
|
qdc x FitEar Superior EX vs. Kiwi Ears Septet
Kiwi Ears Septet offers better soundstage and dynamics.
|
7.3 |
|
qdc x FitEar Superior EX vs. FATfreq x HBB Deuce
FATfreq x HBB Deuce offers better bass, mids and soundstage.
|
7.2 |
|
qdc x FitEar Superior EX vs. ZiiGaat Arete x Fresh Reviews
ZiiGaat Arete x Fresh Reviews offers better soundstage, dynamics and mids.
|
7.1 |
Average Technical & Tuning Grades
Average Tunign Grade
C+- Generally enjoyable tonal character with some noticeable unevenness. Maintains listenability while showing room for refinement in frequency balance.
Average Technical Grade
C+- Satisfactory technical performance. Handles basic detail retrieval adequately in most tracks. Maintains reasonable cohesion in simpler arrangements.
Bass
C+
Average bass performance - present but unremarkable. Has reasonable texture but lacks depth and physicality.
Mids
B-
Decent midrange performance - balanced but unremarkable. Adequate clarity for most genres without notable flaws.
Treble
C+
Decent treble with acceptable extension and detail. Can sound slightly unrefined but avoids being harsh or sibilant.
Dynamics
C+
Decent dynamic performance. Good macro-contrast but micro-dynamics could be more nuanced. Satisfactory impact.
Soundstage
C+
Decent spatial presentation with noticeable width. Some depth perception but height dimension remains underdeveloped.
Details
C
Average resolution - reveals basic elements but misses subtleties. Satisfactory for casual listening but lacks refinement.
Imaging
C+
Decent positional accuracy. Good left/right placement with acceptable center image, though depth positioning is approximate.
Gaming
C+
Fundamental left/right positioning with limited depth perception. Works for non-competitive gaming but lacks precision.
User Reviews
Example User
Posted on ...
"This is an example review"
Pros
- Example pro 1
- Example pro 2
Cons
- Example con 1
- Example con 2
No User-Reviews Yet
Share your experience and build your personal ranking list.
You need to be signed in to write your own review