QKZ ZXN VS JVC FX7 Gumy

Aggregated Scores from Top Experts & Community

IEMRanking.com Home Compare IEMs

QKZ ZXN Aggregated Review Score

QKZ ZXN Average Reviewer Scores

Crin

Average Reviewer Score:

4

Negative

JVC FX7 Gumy Aggregated Review Score

JVC FX7 Gumy Average Reviewer Scores

Precogvision
Super* Review

Average Reviewer Score:

3.1

Negative

QKZ ZXN User Review Score

QKZ ZXN Average User Scores

Average User Score: n/a

Based on 0 user reviews

No user reviews yet. Be the first one who writes a review!

JVC FX7 Gumy User Review Score

JVC FX7 Gumy Average User Scores

Average User Score: n/a

Based on 0 user reviews

No user reviews yet. Be the first one who writes a review!

QKZ ZXN Gaming Score

Gaming Score & Grade

  • The gaming score is prioritizing technical capabilities of the IEM (Separation, Layering, Soundstage) and good value.

Gaming Score

4.2

Gaming Grade

C-

JVC FX7 Gumy Gaming Score

Gaming Score & Grade

  • The gaming score is prioritizing technical capabilities of the IEM (Separation, Layering, Soundstage) and good value.

Gaming Score

2.1

Gaming Grade

E+

QKZ ZXN Scorings

Average Technical & Tuning Grades

Average Tunign Grade

C
  • Significantly flawed tuning. Noticeable frequency imbalances and unnatural timbre distract from music. Lacks versatility across recordings.

Average Technical Grade

C-
  • Limited resolution; finer nuances are masked. Soundstage feels narrow, and complex passages cause muddiness. Transitions lack finesse.
Gaming C-
Minimal environmental definition provides only general audio cues. Suitable for games where positioning isn't critical.

JVC FX7 Gumy Scorings

Average Technical & Tuning Grades

Average Tunign Grade

E+
  • Tonally jarring or fatiguing. Frequency clashes (e.g., piercing treble, bloated bass) make extended listening unpleasant. Poor genre adaptation.

Average Technical Grade

E+
  • Noticeably blurred or congested. Struggles with basic instrument separation; details are lost in simple tracks. Feels "flat" and one-dimensional.
Bass D
Bass is light and underwhelming. While some faint rumble exists, it lacks punch and authority in any meaningful way.
Mids E+
Midrange is thin and hollow with noticeable gaps. Instruments lack body and vocals sound distant and weak.
Treble E+
Treble is noticeably dark and lacking extension. Cymbals lack shimmer and high-frequency details are obscured.
Dynamics E+
Limited dynamic range with poor micro-detail. Subtle volume changes are lost, and transients lack proper attack.
Details E+
Noticeably blurred and lacking definition. Background elements are smeared together and micro-details are inaudible.
Imaging E+
Poor instrument placement with unstable positioning. Instruments drift and lack fixed locations within the sound field.
Gaming E+
Compromised imaging significantly impacts gameplay awareness. Directional cues often lack accuracy or consistency.

QKZ ZXN Reviews

QKZ ZXN reviewed by:

Crin 4 Reviewer Score
C Tuning
C- Tech
check links for more info:

Crin original ranking

Crin Youtube Channel
- Crin

JVC FX7 Gumy Reviews

JVC FX7 Gumy reviewed by:

Precogvision 2.1 Reviewer Score
E+ Tuning
E+ Tech
Boomy and dark, yet simultaneously peaky in the mid-treble. Typical V-shape consumer sound.

Precogvision original ranking

Precogvision Youtube Channel
- Precogvision
Bass: D Mids: E+ Treble: E+ Dynamics: E+ Details: E+ Imaging: E+

JVC FX7 Gumy reviewed by:

Super* Review 4* * score normalized
check links for more info:

Super* Review original ranking

Super* Review Youtube Channel
- Super* Review

QKZ ZXN User Reviews

Example User Posted on ...
0.0

"This is an example review"

Pros
  • Example pro 1
  • Example pro 2
Cons
  • Example con 1
  • Example con 2
No User-Reviews Yet

Be the first to share your experience!

JVC FX7 Gumy User Reviews

Example User Posted on ...
0.0

"This is an example review"

Pros
  • Example pro 1
  • Example pro 2
Cons
  • Example con 1
  • Example con 2
No User-Reviews Yet

Be the first to share your experience!

Footer