Seeaudio Bravery VS Binary Dynaquattro

IEM Comparison: Expert & Community Scores Side-by-Side

IEMRanking.com Home Compare IEMs

Seeaudio Bravery and Binary Dynaquattro use 4BA and 4DD driver setups respectively. Seeaudio Bravery costs $280 while Binary Dynaquattro costs $260. Seeaudio Bravery is $20 more expensive. Binary Dynaquattro holds a decisive 1.9-point edge in reviewer scores (5.5 vs 7.4). Binary Dynaquattro has better mids with a 0.7-point edge, Binary Dynaquattro has slightly better treble with a 0.3-point edge, Binary Dynaquattro has significantly better dynamics with a 4.5-point edge and Binary Dynaquattro has significantly better soundstage with a 1.3-point edge.

Insights

Metric Seeaudio Bravery Binary Dynaquattro
Bass 5.5 7.4
Mids 5.3 6
Treble 5.7 6
Details 6.3 7.4
Soundstage 5.8 7
Imaging 6.3 7.4
Dynamics 3.5 8
Tonality 5.6 7.1
Technicalities 5.5 6.8

Seeaudio Bravery Aggregated Review Score

Average Reviewer Scores

Shuwa-T Precogvision Jaytiss Crin
Super* Review

Average Reviewer Score:

5.5

Mixed to Negative


Binary Dynaquattro Aggregated Review Score

Average Reviewer Scores

Jaytiss Gizaudio Axel Z-Reviews Jays Audio

Average Reviewer Score:

7.4

Generally Favorable


Seeaudio Bravery User Review Score

Average User Scores

Average User Score: n/a

Based on 0 user reviews

No user reviews yet. Be the first one who writes a review!

Binary Dynaquattro User Review Score

Average User Scores

Average User Score: n/a

Based on 0 user reviews

No user reviews yet. Be the first one who writes a review!

Seeaudio Bravery Gaming Score

Gaming Score & Grade

  • The gaming score is prioritizing technical capabilities of the IEM (Separation, Layering, Soundstage) and good value.

Gaming Score

5.5

Gaming Grade

B-

Binary Dynaquattro Gaming Score

Gaming Score & Grade

  • The gaming score is prioritizing technical capabilities of the IEM (Separation, Layering, Soundstage) and good value.

Gaming Score

6.9

Gaming Grade

B+

Seeaudio Bravery Scorings

Average Technical & Tuning Grades

Average Tunign Grade

B-
  • Generally enjoyable tonal character with some noticeable unevenness. Maintains listenability while showing room for refinement in frequency balance.

Average Technical Grade

B-
  • Satisfactory technical performance. Handles basic detail retrieval adequately in most tracks. Maintains reasonable cohesion in simpler arrangements.
Bass B-
Average bass performance - present but unremarkable. Has reasonable texture but lacks depth and physicality.
Mids C+
Decent midrange performance - balanced but unremarkable. Adequate clarity for most genres without notable flaws.
Treble B-
Decent treble with acceptable extension and detail. Can sound slightly unrefined but avoids being harsh or sibilant.
Dynamics D+
Noticeably compressed dynamics. Musical expression suffers with weak transients and poor contrast between quiet and loud sections.
Soundstage B-
Decent spatial presentation with noticeable width. Some depth perception but height dimension remains underdeveloped.
Details B
Good resolution with clear articulation of nuances. Reveals recording nuances and maintains clarity in complex passages.
Imaging B
Good imaging with precise instrument placement. Clear localization within the soundstage including front/back positioning.
Gaming B-
Moderate spatial presentation conveys general directionality. Suitable for casual play where precision isn't critical. Value-to-cost may not be optimal for gaming-focused users.

Binary Dynaquattro Scorings

Average Technical & Tuning Grades

Average Tunign Grade

A-
  • Pleasing tonal balance with good technical control. Minor quirks present but not distracting. Demonstrates decent genre versatility.

Average Technical Grade

B+
  • Satisfactory technical performance. Handles basic detail retrieval adequately in most tracks. Maintains reasonable cohesion in simpler arrangements.
Mids B
Good midrange presence with solid clarity. Vocals are clear and instruments have reasonable texture and body.
Treble B
Good treble response - clear and detailed without fatigue. Well-extended with proper air and sparkle.
Dynamics A+
Superb dynamic range - powerful yet nuanced. Exceptional transient response with lifelike impact and subtle volume gradations.
Soundstage A-
Excellent spatial presentation - wide, deep and tall. Precise instrument placement with clear separation in all dimensions.
Gaming B+
Respectable environmental presentation favors atmosphere over precision. Detects obvious directional cues while conveying game world ambiance. Value-to-cost may not be optimal for gaming-focused users.

Seeaudio Bravery Reviews

Reviewed by: Super* Review

Super* Review 6* * score normalized

Reviewed by: Shuwa-T

Shuwa-T 5.9 Reviewer Score
B- Tuning
B Tech
Comment: One of the rare V-shape that I quite enjoy. Surprising BA bass Male vocals pale in comparison to female vocals, BA timbre evident in treble

Shuwa-T original ranking

Shuwa-T Website

Bass: B Mids: C+ Treble: B Soundstage: B- Details: B+ Imaging: B+

Reviewed by: Precogvision

Precogvision 5.4 Reviewer Score
B- Tuning
B- Tech
Pleasant and coherent, lacking in that special sauce which would take it to the next level.

Precogvision original ranking

Precogvision Youtube Channel
Bass: C+ Mids: B Treble: B Dynamics: C+ Details: B Imaging: B

Reviewed by: Jaytiss

Jaytiss 5 Reviewer Score
C+ Tuning
C+ Tech
Just seems like another BA only set that lacks dynamics and punch.

Jaytiss original ranking

Jaytiss Youtube Channel
Mids: C+ Treble: C+ Dynamics: E+ Soundstage: B

Reviewed by: Crin

Crin 5 Reviewer Score
B Tuning
C+ Tech

Binary Dynaquattro Reviews

Reviewed by: Jaytiss

Jaytiss 7.8 Reviewer Score
B+ Tuning
B Tech
It has great tuning, but lack serverly in some areas. Very fun.

Jaytiss original ranking

Jaytiss Youtube Channel
Mids: B Treble: B Dynamics: A+ Soundstage: A-
Ad
Using this affiliate link for ordering your Binary Dynaquattro or any other IEM helps fund our free service at no extra cost to you.

Price: $194.99

Buy Binary Dynaquattro on HiFiGO

Reviewed by: Gizaudio Axel

Gizaudio Axel 7.5 Reviewer Score
A- Tuning
A- Tech
Shines when driven properly. Excellent bass, vocal-forward tuning, and natural timbre. Hard to drive, could use more treble extension.

Gizaudio Axel original ranking

Gizaudio Axel Youtube Channel

Reviewed by: Z-Reviews

Z-Reviews 7.2 * score normalized

Reviewed by: Jays Audio

Jays Audio 7 Reviewer Score
A Tuning
A Tech
Natural vocals, good treble extension, bass is tight and more resolving vs 61t and Davinci. Overall very well balanced and clean. There are some small peaks at 8-10k and 15-20K which can be an issue on some songs, and there is masking around 4-8k region, but overall, solid all-rounder.

Jays Audio original ranking

Jays Audio Youtube Channel

Seeaudio Bravery User Reviews

Example User Posted on ...
0.0

"This is an example review"

Pros
  • Example pro 1
  • Example pro 2
Cons
  • Example con 1
  • Example con 2
No User-Reviews Yet

Share your experience and build your personal ranking list.

You need to be signed in to write your own review

Binary Dynaquattro User Reviews

Example User Posted on ...
0.0

"This is an example review"

Pros
  • Example pro 1
  • Example pro 2
Cons
  • Example con 1
  • Example con 2
No User-Reviews Yet

Share your experience and build your personal ranking list.

You need to be signed in to write your own review

Find your next IEM:

IEM Finder Quiz

new
Use this quiz and answer a few questions to get your individual IEM recommendation list
(1/2) How much are you willing to spend on the IEM?
(2/2) Which sound characteristics are particularly important to you?

Footer