Kefine Klanar VS SeeAudio x Z Reviews Rinko

IEM Comparison: Expert & Community Scores Side-by-Side

IEMRanking.com Home Compare IEMs

Kefine Klanar and SeeAudio x Z Reviews Rinko are in-ear monitors. Kefine Klanar costs $120 while SeeAudio x Z Reviews Rinko costs $100. Kefine Klanar is $20 more expensive. Kefine Klanar holds a decisive 4.3-point edge in reviewer scores (6.3 vs 2). Kefine Klanar has significantly better mids with a 2.5-point edge, Kefine Klanar has significantly better treble with a 5-point edge, Kefine Klanar has significantly better dynamics with a 3-point edge and Kefine Klanar has significantly better soundstage with a 3-point edge.

Insights

Metric Kefine Klanar SeeAudio x Z Reviews Rinko
Bass 8 2
Mids 5.5 3
Treble 6 1
Soundstage 6 3
Dynamics 4 1
Tonality 6 2
Technicalities 6.8 1

Kefine Klanar Aggregated Review Score

Average Reviewer Scores

Jaytiss
Jays Audio Tim Tuned
Z-Reviews

Average Reviewer Score:

6.3

Mixed to Positive


SeeAudio x Z Reviews Rinko Aggregated Review Score

Average Reviewer Scores

Jaytiss

Average Reviewer Score:

2

Very Negative


Reviews Comparison

SeeAudio x Z Reviews Rinko reviewed by Jaytiss

Jaytiss 2 Reviewer Score
E+ Tuning
E- Tech
I like Zeos, I like waifus. I like SeeAudio. :)

Jaytiss original ranking

Jaytiss Youtube Channel
Mids: D Treble: E- Dynamics: E- Soundstage: D

Kefine Klanar (more reviews)

Kefine Klanar reviewed by Z-Reviews

Z-Reviews 8 * score normalized

Kefine Klanar reviewed by Jays Audio

Jays Audio 6 Reviewer Score
A- Tuning
A Tech
A cheaper S12. Almost identical sound and tuning. Good value. Look for aliexpress deals.

Jays Audio original ranking

Jays Audio Youtube Channel

Kefine Klanar reviewed by Tim Tuned

Tim Tuned 6 Reviewer Score
B Tuning
A+ Tech
Cheaper S12 Pro/ Z12

Tim Tuned original ranking

Tim Tuned Youtube Channel
Bass: A+ Mids: A- Treble: A-

Kefine Klanar User Review Score

Average User Scores

Average User Score: n/a

Based on 0 user reviews

No user reviews yet. Be the first one who writes a review!

SeeAudio x Z Reviews Rinko User Review Score

Average User Scores

Average User Score: n/a

Based on 0 user reviews

No user reviews yet. Be the first one who writes a review!

Kefine Klanar Gaming Score

Gaming Score & Grade

  • The gaming score is prioritizing technical capabilities of the IEM (Separation, Layering, Soundstage) and good value.

Gaming Score

6.6

Gaming Grade

B+

SeeAudio x Z Reviews Rinko Gaming Score

Gaming Score & Grade

  • The gaming score is prioritizing technical capabilities of the IEM (Separation, Layering, Soundstage) and good value.

Gaming Score

1.3

Gaming Grade

E-

Kefine Klanar Scorings

Average Technical & Tuning Grades

Average Tunign Grade

B
  • Generally enjoyable tonal character with some noticeable unevenness. Maintains listenability while showing room for refinement in frequency balance.

Average Technical Grade

B+
  • Satisfactory technical performance. Handles basic detail retrieval adequately in most tracks. Maintains reasonable cohesion in simpler arrangements.
Bass A+
Excellent bass response - powerful yet controlled. Deep extension with authoritative slam while maintaining clarity.
Mids B-
Decent midrange performance - balanced but unremarkable. Adequate clarity for most genres without notable flaws.
Treble B
Good treble response - clear and detailed without fatigue. Well-extended with proper air and sparkle.
Dynamics C-
Average dynamics - passable but unexciting. Transients are rounded and micro-dynamics lack refinement.
Soundstage B
Good soundstage with proper width and depth. Instruments have clear positioning with reasonable front/back placement.
Gaming B+
Respectable environmental presentation favors atmosphere over precision. Detects obvious directional cues while conveying game world ambiance.

SeeAudio x Z Reviews Rinko Scorings

Average Technical & Tuning Grades

Average Tunign Grade

E+
  • Tonally jarring or fatiguing. Frequency clashes (e.g., piercing treble, bloated bass) make extended listening unpleasant. Poor genre adaptation.

Average Technical Grade

E-
  • Noticeably blurred or congested. Struggles with basic instrument separation; details are lost in simple tracks. Feels "flat" and one-dimensional.
Mids D
Midrange is significantly uneven with coloration. Some frequencies are boosted while others are missing, creating an unnatural tone.
Treble E-
Treble is extremely rolled off and veiled. High frequencies are barely perceptible with significant loss of detail.
Dynamics E-
Extremely poor dynamic expression. Lacks any sense of impact or volume gradation, making music feel one-dimensional.
Soundstage D
Modest soundstage that feels confined. Some left/right separation but completely lacks depth and height dimensions.
Gaming E-
Compromised imaging significantly impacts gameplay awareness. Directional cues often lack accuracy or consistency.

Kefine Klanar User Reviews

Example User Posted on ...
0.0

"This is an example review"

Pros
  • Example pro 1
  • Example pro 2
Cons
  • Example con 1
  • Example con 2
No User-Reviews Yet

Share your experience and build your personal ranking list.

You need to be signed in to write your own review

SeeAudio x Z Reviews Rinko User Reviews

Example User Posted on ...
0.0

"This is an example review"

Pros
  • Example pro 1
  • Example pro 2
Cons
  • Example con 1
  • Example con 2
No User-Reviews Yet

Share your experience and build your personal ranking list.

You need to be signed in to write your own review

Find your next IEM:

IEM Finder Quiz

new
Use this quiz and answer a few questions to get your individual IEM recommendation list
(1/2) How much are you willing to spend on the IEM?
(2/2) Which sound characteristics are particularly important to you?
Buy

Footer