Seeaudio Yume II VS EPZ P50

IEM Comparison: Expert & Community Scores Side-by-Side

IEMRanking.com Home Compare IEMs

Seeaudio Yume II and EPZ P50 use 2BA+1DD> and 1DD+2BA+2Planar driver setups respectively. Seeaudio Yume II costs $200 while EPZ P50 costs $189. Seeaudio Yume II is $11 more expensive. EPZ P50 holds a decisive 1.1-point edge in reviewer scores (5.9 vs 7). EPZ P50 carries a user score of 9.5. EPZ P50 has significantly better bass with a 2.5-point edge, EPZ P50 has significantly better mids with a 2.3-point edge, EPZ P50 has significantly better treble with a 2-point edge and EPZ P50 has slightly better soundstage with a 0.3-point edge.

Insights

Metric Seeaudio Yume II EPZ P50
Bass 5.5 8
Mids 5.7 8
Treble 5.5 7.5
Details 5.5 7
Soundstage 6.8 7
Imaging 5.3 7
Dynamics 5 5
Gaming capabilities 5.4 7

Seeaudio Yume II Aggregated Review Score

Seeaudio Yume II Average Reviewer Scores

Nymz
Jaytiss Shuwa-T

Average Reviewer Score:

5.9

Mixed


EPZ P50 Aggregated Review Score

EPZ P50 Average Reviewer Scores

Gizaudio Axel
Jays Audio Tim Tuned Jaytiss
Super* Review

Average Reviewer Score:

7

Generally Favorable


Seeaudio Yume II User Review Score

Seeaudio Yume II Average User Scores

Average User Score: n/a

Based on 0 user reviews

No user reviews yet. Be the first one who writes a review!

EPZ P50 User Review Score

EPZ P50 Average User Scores

Average User Score:

Based on 1 user reviews

9.5

Exceptional

Seeaudio Yume II Gaming Score

Gaming Score & Grade

  • The gaming score is prioritizing technical capabilities of the IEM (Separation, Layering, Soundstage) and good value.

Gaming Score

5.4

Gaming Grade

C+

EPZ P50 Gaming Score

Gaming Score & Grade

  • The gaming score is prioritizing technical capabilities of the IEM (Separation, Layering, Soundstage) and good value.

Gaming Score

7

Gaming Grade

A-

Seeaudio Yume II Scorings

Average Technical & Tuning Grades

Average Tunign Grade

B-
  • Generally enjoyable tonal character with some noticeable unevenness. Maintains listenability while showing room for refinement in frequency balance.

Average Technical Grade

C+
  • Satisfactory technical performance. Handles basic detail retrieval adequately in most tracks. Maintains reasonable cohesion in simpler arrangements.
Bass B-
Average bass performance - present but unremarkable. Has reasonable texture but lacks depth and physicality.
Mids B-
Decent midrange performance - balanced but unremarkable. Adequate clarity for most genres without notable flaws.
Treble B-
Decent treble with acceptable extension and detail. Can sound slightly unrefined but avoids being harsh or sibilant.
Dynamics C+
Decent dynamic performance. Good macro-contrast but micro-dynamics could be more nuanced. Satisfactory impact.
Soundstage B+
Good soundstage with proper width and depth. Instruments have clear positioning with reasonable front/back placement.
Details B-
Decent detail retrieval. Handles most textures adequately though micro-details and ambient cues could be more pronounced.
Imaging C+
Decent positional accuracy. Good left/right placement with acceptable center image, though depth positioning is approximate.
Gaming C+
Fundamental left/right positioning with limited depth perception. Works for non-competitive gaming but lacks precision.

EPZ P50 Scorings

Average Technical & Tuning Grades

Average Tunign Grade

B+
  • Generally enjoyable tonal character with some noticeable unevenness. Maintains listenability while showing room for refinement in frequency balance.

Average Technical Grade

A-
  • Competent technical presentation. Handles separation and detail well in most tracks, with modest soundstage and acceptable imaging capabilities.
Bass A+
Excellent bass response - powerful yet controlled. Deep extension with authoritative slam while maintaining clarity.
Mids A+
Superb midrange that's rich and resolving. Exceptional transparency and micro-details with perfect vocal/instrument balance.
Treble A
Excellent treble: airy, extended and well-controlled. Great micro-detail retrieval without sibilance or harshness.
Dynamics C+
Decent dynamic performance. Good macro-contrast but micro-dynamics could be more nuanced. Satisfactory impact.
Soundstage A-
Excellent spatial presentation - wide, deep and tall. Precise instrument placement with clear separation in all dimensions.
Gaming A-
Good fundamental spatial awareness for most gaming scenarios. Handles basic positioning well but may lack nuance in complex situations.

Seeaudio Yume II Reviews

Seeaudio Yume II reviewed by:

Jaytiss 6.8 Reviewer Score
B- Tuning
C+ Tech
This could be end game for some.

Jaytiss original ranking

Jaytiss Youtube Channel
- Jaytiss
Mids: B Treble: C+ Dynamics: C+ Soundstage: A-

Seeaudio Yume II reviewed by:

Shuwa-T 6.4 Reviewer Score
B Tuning
B+ Tech
Comment: This would be the set if it came out in 2021. Bump in clarity and very well tuned

Shuwa-T original ranking

Shuwa-T Website

- Shuwa-T
Bass: B Mids: B Treble: B+ Soundstage: B+ Details: A- Imaging: B+

Seeaudio Yume II reviewed by:

Nymz 4.6 Reviewer Score
C+ Tuning
C- Tech
Shows some signs of incoherency and lack of bass texture, but a very solid option due to its tonal balance.

Nymz original ranking

Nymz Website

- Nymz
Bass: C+ Mids: C+ Treble: C+ Details: C- Imaging: C-

EPZ P50 Reviews

EPZ P50 reviewed by:

Super* Review 8* * score normalized
Bass can be a little bit on the distracting side if you are looking for a neutral sound signature. Contrasty meta-tuning.

Super* Review original ranking

Super* Review Youtube Channel
- Super* Review
Ad
Using this affiliate link for ordering your EPZ P50 or any other IEM helps fund our free service at no extra cost to you.

Price: $260

Buy EPZ P50 on Aliexpress

EPZ P50 reviewed by:

Jays Audio 7 Reviewer Score
A+ Tuning
A Tech
Clean balanced tuning done right. A better tuned MEGA5EST & MOONDROP Meteor with fuller low-end, and more treble extension, same tech, but more dynamic - also half the price. A Mega5EST with better vocals and dynamics but less smooth and airy. Low-end will be weak to some people and on certain tracks. Not the most unique sound since it's clean/neutral/balanced.

Jays Audio original ranking

Jays Audio Youtube Channel
- Jays Audio

EPZ P50 reviewed by:

Tim Tuned 7.5 Reviewer Score
A Tuning
A+ Tech
Beautifully done tuning all around Nitpick: Bass dynamic could be better

Tim Tuned original ranking

Tim Tuned Youtube Channel
- Tim Tuned
Bass: A+ Mids: S Treble: A+

EPZ P50 reviewed by:

Jaytiss 7.5 Reviewer Score
B+ Tuning
A- Tech
For me this has some oddities. It would be higher if those weren't there.

Jaytiss original ranking

Jaytiss Youtube Channel
- Jaytiss
Mids: A- Treble: A- Dynamics: C+ Soundstage: A-

EPZ P50 reviewed by:

Gizaudio Axel 5 Reviewer Score
C+ Tuning
B Tech
check links for more info:

Gizaudio Axel original ranking

Gizaudio Axel Youtube Channel
- Gizaudio Axel

Seeaudio Yume II User Reviews

Example User Posted on ...
0.0

"This is an example review"

Pros
  • Example pro 1
  • Example pro 2
Cons
  • Example con 1
  • Example con 2
No User-Reviews Yet

Share your experience and build your personal ranking list.

You need to be signed in to write your own review

EPZ P50 User Reviews

Share your experience and build your personal ranking list.

You need to be signed in to write your own review
yorxx 2025-07-11 16:52:45
9.5

Killabuck.

Pros
No roughness, Natural timbre, Balanced signature, good note density, Very good consistency, comfortable to use, Good cable, Technically amazing, good accessories, good tips, good transparency, good brightness, tactile bass, not much warmth, nice voices.
Cons
None.

Find your next IEM:

IEM Finder Quiz

new
Use this quiz and answer a few questions to get your individual IEM recommendation list
(1/2) How much are you willing to spend on the IEM?
(2/2) Which sound characteristics are particularly important to you?

Footer