Seeaudio Yume II [6.3/10]
Reviews (4), scores and comparisons for Seeaudio Yume II
IEMRanking.com
Home
Seeaudio Yume II
Average Reviewer Scores
Average Reviewer Score:
6.3Mixed to Positive
Average User Scores
Average User Score: n/a
Based on 0 user reviews
No user reviews yet. Be the first one who writes a review!
Gaming Score & Grade
- The gaming score is prioritizing technical capabilities of the IEM (Separation, Layering, Soundstage) and good value.
Gaming Score
5.6Gaming Grade
B-Seeaudio Yume II Details
Driver Configuration: 2BA+1DD>
Tuning Type: n/a
Brand: SeeAudio Top SeeAudio IEMs
Price (Msrp): $200
Support our free service! Buying through our affiliate links costs you nothing extra:
Reviews
Reviewed by: Bad Guy Good Audio
7.3
Reviewer Score
A-
Tuning
B
Tech
check links for more info:
Bad Guy Good Audio original ranking
Bad Guy Good Audio Youtube Channel
Bass: A-
Mids: A-
Treble: A-
Reviewed by: Jaytiss
6.8
Reviewer Score
B-
Tuning
C+
Tech
This could be end game for some.
Jaytiss Youtube Channel
Jaytiss Youtube Channel
Mids: B
Treble: C+
Dynamics: C+
Soundstage: A-
Reviewed by: Shuwa-T
6.4
Reviewer Score
B
Tuning
B+
Tech
Comment: This would be the set if it came out in 2021.
Bump in clarity and very well tuned
Bass: B
Mids: B
Treble: B+
Soundstage: B+
Details: A-
Imaging: B+
Reviewed by: Nymz
4.6
Reviewer Score
C+
Tuning
C-
Tech
Shows some signs of incoherency and lack of bass texture, but a very solid option due to its tonal balance.
Bass: C+
Mids: C+
Treble: C+
Details: C-
Imaging: C-
Tools
IEM Finder Quiz
new
Use this quiz and answer a few questions to get your individual IEM recommendation list
(1/2) How much are you willing to spend on the IEM?
(2/2) Which sound characteristics are particularly important to you?
Seeaudio Yume II Infos
Compare Seeaudio Yume II to popular alternatives
Compare two IEMs side by side
Name
VS
Name
| IEM | alt. Score |
|---|---|
|
Seeaudio Yume II vs. Aful Performer 5+2
Aful Performer 5+2 offers better imaging, dynamics and details.
|
7.7 |
|
Seeaudio Yume II vs. Ziigaat Odyssey
Ziigaat Odyssey offers better mids, dynamics and bass.
|
7.6 |
|
Seeaudio Yume II vs. Gizaudio x Binary Chopin
Gizaudio x Binary Chopin offers better dynamics, details and imaging.
|
7.6 |
|
Seeaudio Yume II vs. CrinEar Daybreak
CrinEar Daybreak offers better imaging, details and dynamics.
|
7.3 |
|
Seeaudio Yume II vs. DUNU x KOTO ITO
DUNU x KOTO ITO offers better dynamics, imaging and bass.
|
7.3 |
|
Seeaudio Yume II vs. FATfreq x HBB Deuce
FATfreq x HBB Deuce offers better bass, mids and dynamics.
|
7.2 |
|
Seeaudio Yume II vs. EPZ P50
EPZ P50 offers better bass, mids and treble.
|
7 |
|
Seeaudio Yume II vs. BQEYZ Winter
Similar overall performance.
|
7 |
|
Seeaudio Yume II vs. Pula PA02
Pula PA02 offers better bass, mids and treble.
|
7 |
|
Seeaudio Yume II vs. Kiwi Ears KE4
Kiwi Ears KE4 offers better mids, bass and dynamics.
|
6.9 |
Average Technical & Tuning Grades
Average Tunign Grade
B- Generally enjoyable tonal character with some noticeable unevenness. Maintains listenability while showing room for refinement in frequency balance.
Average Technical Grade
C+- Satisfactory technical performance. Handles basic detail retrieval adequately in most tracks. Maintains reasonable cohesion in simpler arrangements.
Bass
B
Good bass foundation with decent impact. Maintains acceptable control while providing satisfying thump in most tracks.
Mids
B
Good midrange presence with solid clarity. Vocals are clear and instruments have reasonable texture and body.
Treble
B-
Decent treble with acceptable extension and detail. Can sound slightly unrefined but avoids being harsh or sibilant.
Dynamics
C+
Decent dynamic performance. Good macro-contrast but micro-dynamics could be more nuanced. Satisfactory impact.
Soundstage
B+
Good soundstage with proper width and depth. Instruments have clear positioning with reasonable front/back placement.
Details
B-
Decent detail retrieval. Handles most textures adequately though micro-details and ambient cues could be more pronounced.
Imaging
C+
Decent positional accuracy. Good left/right placement with acceptable center image, though depth positioning is approximate.
Gaming
B-
Moderate spatial presentation conveys general directionality. Suitable for casual play where precision isn't critical.
User Reviews
Example User
Posted on ...
"This is an example review"
Pros
- Example pro 1
- Example pro 2
Cons
- Example con 1
- Example con 2
No User-Reviews Yet
Share your experience and build your personal ranking list.
You need to be signed in to write your own review