FATfreq x HBB Deuce VS Seeaudio Yume II

IEM Comparison: Expert & Community Scores Side-by-Side

IEMRanking.com Home Compare IEMs

FATfreq x HBB Deuce and Seeaudio Yume II use 2DD and 2BA+1DD> driver setups respectively. FATfreq x HBB Deuce costs $239 while Seeaudio Yume II costs $200. FATfreq x HBB Deuce is $39 more expensive. FATfreq x HBB Deuce holds a clear 0.9-point edge in reviewer scores (7.2 vs 6.3). FATfreq x HBB Deuce has significantly better bass with a 1-point edge, FATfreq x HBB Deuce has significantly better mids with a 1-point edge, Seeaudio Yume II has slightly better treble with a 0.4-point edge, FATfreq x HBB Deuce has significantly better dynamics with a 1-point edge and Seeaudio Yume II has better soundstage with a 0.8-point edge.

Insights

Metric FATfreq x HBB Deuce Seeaudio Yume II
Bass 7 6
Mids 7 6
Treble 5.5 5.9
Details 7.2 5.5
Soundstage 6 6.8
Imaging 7.2 5.3
Dynamics 6 5
Tonality 6.6 6
Technicalities 5.8 5.4

FATfreq x HBB Deuce Aggregated Review Score

Average Reviewer Scores

Jaytiss Jays Audio
Audionotions Bad Guy Good Audio Z-Reviews
Super* Review

Average Reviewer Score:

7.2

Generally Favorable


Seeaudio Yume II Aggregated Review Score

Average Reviewer Scores

Nymz
Jaytiss Shuwa-T
Bad Guy Good Audio

Average Reviewer Score:

6.3

Mixed to Positive


FATfreq x HBB Deuce User Review Score

Average User Scores

Average User Score: n/a

Based on 0 user reviews

No user reviews yet. Be the first one who writes a review!

Seeaudio Yume II User Review Score

Average User Scores

Average User Score: n/a

Based on 0 user reviews

No user reviews yet. Be the first one who writes a review!

FATfreq x HBB Deuce Gaming Score

Gaming Score & Grade

  • The gaming score is prioritizing technical capabilities of the IEM (Separation, Layering, Soundstage) and good value.

Gaming Score

6.1

Gaming Grade

B

Seeaudio Yume II Gaming Score

Gaming Score & Grade

  • The gaming score is prioritizing technical capabilities of the IEM (Separation, Layering, Soundstage) and good value.

Gaming Score

5.6

Gaming Grade

B-

FATfreq x HBB Deuce Scorings

Average Technical & Tuning Grades

Average Tunign Grade

B+
  • Generally enjoyable tonal character with some noticeable unevenness. Maintains listenability while showing room for refinement in frequency balance.

Average Technical Grade

B-
  • Satisfactory technical performance. Handles basic detail retrieval adequately in most tracks. Maintains reasonable cohesion in simpler arrangements.
Bass A-
Strong, well-defined bass with good texture. Delivers satisfying punch and rumble without overwhelming other frequencies.
Mids A-
Excellent midrange with natural timbre and great detail retrieval. Vocals are forward and emotive with lifelike instrument reproduction.
Treble B-
Decent treble with acceptable extension and detail. Can sound slightly unrefined but avoids being harsh or sibilant.
Dynamics B
Good dynamic expression with solid impact. Handles volume contrasts well while maintaining good transient snap.
Soundstage B
Good soundstage with proper width and depth. Instruments have clear positioning with reasonable front/back placement.
Gaming B
Decent spatial awareness for fundamental positioning. Creates satisfying atmosphere in story-driven games while handling basic directional cues.

Seeaudio Yume II Scorings

Average Technical & Tuning Grades

Average Tunign Grade

B
  • Generally enjoyable tonal character with some noticeable unevenness. Maintains listenability while showing room for refinement in frequency balance.

Average Technical Grade

C+
  • Satisfactory technical performance. Handles basic detail retrieval adequately in most tracks. Maintains reasonable cohesion in simpler arrangements.
Bass B
Good bass foundation with decent impact. Maintains acceptable control while providing satisfying thump in most tracks.
Mids B
Good midrange presence with solid clarity. Vocals are clear and instruments have reasonable texture and body.
Treble B-
Decent treble with acceptable extension and detail. Can sound slightly unrefined but avoids being harsh or sibilant.
Dynamics C+
Decent dynamic performance. Good macro-contrast but micro-dynamics could be more nuanced. Satisfactory impact.
Soundstage B+
Good soundstage with proper width and depth. Instruments have clear positioning with reasonable front/back placement.
Details B-
Decent detail retrieval. Handles most textures adequately though micro-details and ambient cues could be more pronounced.
Imaging C+
Decent positional accuracy. Good left/right placement with acceptable center image, though depth positioning is approximate.
Gaming B-
Moderate spatial presentation conveys general directionality. Suitable for casual play where precision isn't critical.

FATfreq x HBB Deuce Reviews

Reviewed by: Super* Review

Super* Review 8.5* * score normalized
This is not my usual sound signature which I like. But it's a lot of fun in a unique way. One-trick pony.

Super* Review original ranking

Super* Review Youtube Channel

Reviewed by: Audionotions

Audionotions 7.5 Reviewer Score
Easy reccomendation for somoene looking for a basshead IEM that still retains some resemblence of neutrality through the mids and treble. Loaner

Audionotions original ranking

Website (Audionotions)

Reviewed by: Bad Guy Good Audio

Bad Guy Good Audio 7.1 Reviewer Score
B Tuning
B Tech
check links for more info:

Bad Guy Good Audio original ranking

Bad Guy Good Audio Youtube Channel
Bass: A- Mids: A+ Treble: B

Reviewed by: Z-Reviews

Z-Reviews 7 * score normalized

Reviewed by: Jaytiss

Jaytiss 6.8 Reviewer Score
B- Tuning
C+ Tech
Hits Hard, and is super fun. Suprisingly great mids.

Jaytiss original ranking

Jaytiss Youtube Channel
Mids: B Treble: C+ Dynamics: B Soundstage: B

Reviewed by: Jays Audio

Jays Audio 6 Reviewer Score
A+ Tuning
B+ Tech
The defacto basshead rec before the more expensive stuff. Super fun sub-bass, textured, heavy, prolonged decay for more reverb in the bass, well-balanced as well, smooth and scales great. Tech is not its strong point, and DON'T buy from FatFreq directly!!!

Jays Audio original ranking

Jays Audio Youtube Channel

Seeaudio Yume II Reviews

Reviewed by: Bad Guy Good Audio

Bad Guy Good Audio 7.3 Reviewer Score
A- Tuning
B Tech
check links for more info:

Bad Guy Good Audio original ranking

Bad Guy Good Audio Youtube Channel
Bass: A- Mids: A- Treble: A-

Reviewed by: Jaytiss

Jaytiss 6.8 Reviewer Score
B- Tuning
C+ Tech
This could be end game for some.

Jaytiss original ranking

Jaytiss Youtube Channel
Mids: B Treble: C+ Dynamics: C+ Soundstage: A-

Reviewed by: Shuwa-T

Shuwa-T 6.4 Reviewer Score
B Tuning
B+ Tech
Comment: This would be the set if it came out in 2021. Bump in clarity and very well tuned

Shuwa-T original ranking

Shuwa-T Website

Bass: B Mids: B Treble: B+ Soundstage: B+ Details: A- Imaging: B+

Reviewed by: Nymz

Nymz 4.6 Reviewer Score
C+ Tuning
C- Tech
Shows some signs of incoherency and lack of bass texture, but a very solid option due to its tonal balance.

Nymz original ranking

Nymz Website

Bass: C+ Mids: C+ Treble: C+ Details: C- Imaging: C-

FATfreq x HBB Deuce User Reviews

Example User Posted on ...
0.0

"This is an example review"

Pros
  • Example pro 1
  • Example pro 2
Cons
  • Example con 1
  • Example con 2
No User-Reviews Yet

Share your experience and build your personal ranking list.

You need to be signed in to write your own review

Seeaudio Yume II User Reviews

Example User Posted on ...
0.0

"This is an example review"

Pros
  • Example pro 1
  • Example pro 2
Cons
  • Example con 1
  • Example con 2
No User-Reviews Yet

Share your experience and build your personal ranking list.

You need to be signed in to write your own review

Find your next IEM:

IEM Finder Quiz

new
Use this quiz and answer a few questions to get your individual IEM recommendation list
(1/2) How much are you willing to spend on the IEM?
(2/2) Which sound characteristics are particularly important to you?

Footer