Letshuoer Cadenza 4 VS Simgot ET142

IEM Comparison: Expert & Community Scores Side-by-Side

IEMRanking.com Home Compare IEMs

Letshuoer Cadenza 4 and Simgot ET142 use 4BA and 1Planar+1BC driver setups respectively. Letshuoer Cadenza 4 costs $250 while Simgot ET142 costs $220. Letshuoer Cadenza 4 is $30 more expensive. Letshuoer Cadenza 4 holds a slight 0.2-point edge in reviewer scores (7.1 vs 6.9). Simgot ET142 carries a user score of 7.3.

Insights

Metric Letshuoer Cadenza 4 Simgot ET142
Bass 6 6.9
Mids 7 6.9
Treble 6.5 6.9
Details 7 6.9
Soundstage 7 6.9
Imaging 7 6.9
Dynamics 6 6.9
Tonality 7.1 7.5
Technicalities 6.8 8

Letshuoer Cadenza 4 Aggregated Review Score

Average Reviewer Scores

Shuwa-T
Jaytiss Jays Audio

Average Reviewer Score:

7.1

Generally Favorable


Simgot ET142 Aggregated Review Score

Average Reviewer Scores

Z-Reviews Fresh Reviews
Jays Audio

Average Reviewer Score:

6.9

Cautiously Favorable


Reviews Comparison

Letshuoer Cadenza 4 reviewed by Jays Audio

Jays Audio 7 Reviewer Score
A+ Tuning
A Tech
Slightly bright, clean sound, very airy, sweet vocals. Great separation and resolution. Reminds me of the OG Orcales. Follows Harman 2019 but with more air. Needs more low-end, not an all-rounder. Not rec for hiphop, kpop, rock. Very good for indie, ballads, classical and acoustics.

Jays Audio original ranking

Jays Audio Youtube Channel

Simgot ET142 reviewed by Jays Audio

Jays Audio 7 Reviewer Score
A Tuning
A+ Tech
Lots of variety with nozzles.Tames down 2K, keeps treble extension, basically a Timeless 2 with better fit and more detail with blue nozzle.

SIMGOT’s ET142 pairs a planar driver with a PZT, delivering a bright-leaning, lively all-rounder that feels like a more mature, slightly more detailed take on the original S12 tonality. Treble is the surprise: it carries bite and air without the usual planar “sizzle”, landing closer to a well-implemented PZT sheen. Micro-nuance on cymbal work is improved, vocals are open, and technical performance is among the best heard from planars in this bracket. The 2 kHz region can read a touch shy, while overall treble sits above Harman, so expect sparkle and energy rather than warmth.

Volume and fit matter. At mid levels (~60–65 dB) the ET142 sounds engaging and airy; push past ~70–75 dB and the upper energy can turn fatiguing, with forward vocals and sharper highs on busy tracks. Tip choice is critical: treble-boosting tips can be too much, whereas wide-bore, smoother tips (e.g., “Senai Wide”) keep the top end in check. Both included nozzles measure and sound essentially the same—an opportunity missed for a second, tamer tuning. Genre-wise, rock, indie and slower pop benefit from the speed and air; dense electronic can edge bright, while K-/J-pop stays bouncy at moderate volume.

Bass is quick, punchy and clean with tight decay and excellent separation—don’t expect DD-level rumble or lingering reverb, but do expect balance and definition. Versus safer, more relaxed tunings (S8/S15/S12 2024), the ET142 is the more exciting pick; against neutral all-rounders (e.g., “Pilgrim”), it trades smoothness for air and sparkle; compared to sets like “Dusk,” it’s livelier with less treble fizzle but a more forward top end. At around $200, build is excellent (metal shells, braided cable) and the value strong—competing with some $300–$400 options. In short: choose ET142 for a bright, technical, energetic listen; skip it if a laid-back or dark tilt is the goal.


Jays Audio original ranking

Jays Audio Youtube Channel

Letshuoer Cadenza 4 (more reviews)

Letshuoer Cadenza 4 reviewed by Jaytiss

Jaytiss 7.5 Reviewer Score
B+ Tuning
B Tech
It's like a better Hexa, it's not bad, but feels lean.

Jaytiss original ranking

Jaytiss Youtube Channel
Mids: A- Treble: B Dynamics: B Soundstage: A-

Letshuoer Cadenza 4 reviewed by Shuwa-T

Shuwa-T 6.8 Reviewer Score
B+ Tuning
A- Tech
Weakest point is the slightly thin midbass to lower midrange, makes up for it in the midrange clarity and treble smoothness

Shuwa-T original ranking

Shuwa-T Website

Bass: B Mids: A- Treble: A- Soundstage: A- Details: A- Imaging: A-

Simgot ET142 (more reviews)

Simgot ET142 reviewed by Z-Reviews

Z-Reviews 6.8 * score normalized

Simgot ET142 reviewed by Fresh Reviews

Fresh Reviews 6.5* * The score of this reviewer influences only the Gaming Score

Letshuoer Cadenza 4 User Review Score

Average User Scores

Average User Score: n/a

Based on 0 user reviews

No user reviews yet. Be the first one who writes a review!

Simgot ET142 User Review Score

Average User Scores

Average User Score:

Based on 1 user reviews

7.3

Generally Favorable

Letshuoer Cadenza 4 Gaming Score

Gaming Score & Grade

  • The gaming score is prioritizing technical capabilities of the IEM (Separation, Layering, Soundstage) and good value.

Gaming Score

6.9

Gaming Grade

B+

Simgot ET142 Gaming Score

Gaming Score & Grade

  • The gaming score is prioritizing technical capabilities of the IEM (Separation, Layering, Soundstage) and good value.

Gaming Score

8.1

Gaming Grade

A+

Letshuoer Cadenza 4 Scorings

Average Technical & Tuning Grades

Average Tunign Grade

A-
  • Pleasing tonal balance with good technical control. Minor quirks present but not distracting. Demonstrates decent genre versatility.

Average Technical Grade

B+
  • Satisfactory technical performance. Handles basic detail retrieval adequately in most tracks. Maintains reasonable cohesion in simpler arrangements.
Bass B
Good bass foundation with decent impact. Maintains acceptable control while providing satisfying thump in most tracks.
Mids A-
Excellent midrange with natural timbre and great detail retrieval. Vocals are forward and emotive with lifelike instrument reproduction.
Treble B+
Good treble response - clear and detailed without fatigue. Well-extended with proper air and sparkle.
Dynamics B
Good dynamic expression with solid impact. Handles volume contrasts well while maintaining good transient snap.
Soundstage A-
Excellent spatial presentation - wide, deep and tall. Precise instrument placement with clear separation in all dimensions.
Details A-
Excellent detail retrieval: highly resolving without being clinical. Effortlessly reveals micro-details and textural subtleties.
Imaging A-
Excellent imaging: precise and stable placement. Instruments occupy specific points in space with tangible positions.
Gaming B+
Respectable environmental presentation favors atmosphere over precision. Detects obvious directional cues while conveying game world ambiance. Value-to-cost may not be optimal for gaming-focused users.

Simgot ET142 Scorings

Average Technical & Tuning Grades

Average Tunign Grade

A
  • Well-executed tonal character. No major flaws with good technical control. Smooth presentation works with multiple genres.

Average Technical Grade

A+
  • Very competent with articulate presentation. Well-defined layers and precise imaging. Soundstage is immersive and handles dynamics well.
Gaming A+
Reliable positional tracking with good environmental awareness. Maintains clarity during busy scenes while conveying atmospheric depth. Exceptional value for gaming at this price point.

Letshuoer Cadenza 4 User Reviews

Example User Posted on ...
0.0

"This is an example review"

Pros
  • Example pro 1
  • Example pro 2
Cons
  • Example con 1
  • Example con 2
No User-Reviews Yet

Share your experience and build your personal ranking list.

You need to be signed in to write your own review

Simgot ET142 User Reviews

Share your experience and build your personal ranking list.

You need to be signed in to write your own review
Zale
7.3

The Simgot ET142 delivers a smooth and natural sound signature with strong mids but lacks impact in the bass region.

Tuning: A Tech: A- Bass: B+ Mids: A Treble: A- Dynamics: A- Soundstage: B+ Details: A- Imaging: A-
Pros
Clear and detailed mids with good instrument separation; solid build quality and comfortable fit.
Cons
Bass can feel a bit light for bassheads; soundstage is average and not very wide.

Find your next IEM:

IEM Finder Quiz

new
Use this quiz and answer a few questions to get your individual IEM recommendation list
(1/2) How much are you willing to spend on the IEM?
(2/2) Which sound characteristics are particularly important to you?
Buy

Footer