Softears RS10 VS 64 Audio Tia Trio

IEM Comparison: Expert & Community Scores Side-by-Side

Home Ranking Compare IEMs

Softears RS10 and 64 Audio Tia Trio use 10BA and 1DD+2BA driver setups respectively. Softears RS10 costs $2,100 while 64 Audio Tia Trio costs $2,300. 64 Audio Tia Trio is $200 more expensive. 64 Audio Tia Trio holds a clear 0.9-point edge in reviewer scores (7.6 vs 8.5). 64 Audio Tia Trio carries a user score of 7.9. 64 Audio Tia Trio has significantly better bass with a 3.5-point edge, 64 Audio Tia Trio has slightly better mids with a 0.4-point edge, 64 Audio Tia Trio has significantly better dynamics with a 3.5-point edge, Softears RS10 has better details with a 0.5-point edge and 64 Audio Tia Trio has significantly better imaging with a 1.5-point edge.

Insights

Metric Softears RS10 64 Audio Tia Trio
Bass 6.5 10
Mids 6.6 7
Treble 7.1 7
Details 8.5 8
Soundstage 7.5 8.5
Imaging 7 8.5
Dynamics 5.5 9
Tonality 7.3 7.8
Technicalities 7.9 8

Softears RS10 Aggregated Review Score

Average Reviewer Scores

Average Reviewer Score:

7.6

Strongly Favorable


64 Audio Tia Trio Aggregated Review Score

Average Reviewer Scores

Average Reviewer Score:

8.5

Very Positive


Reviews Comparison

Softears RS10 reviewed by Crin

Crin 8 Reviewer Score
A+ Tuning
A+ Tech
A little shouty and intense but very resolving and well-defined. A somewhat refined Moondrop S8.
Youtube Video Summary

Softears RS10 targets the top of the detail game at $2,100, but its extras feel dated: a leather hard case, pouch, tips, metal card, and a basic cable—often without interchangeable plugs (current Hangout stock is 4.4 mm). The shell is fully filled resin with a glass-like look that reads premium despite the old-school accessory pack.

Tuning skews a brighter V/U-shape—think JM1 diffuse field (5128) with a bass shelf. Bass is competent, not class-leading at the price; the real draw is the treble: forward, incisive, and surprisingly non-sibilant. RS10 is a detail monster that shoves low-level information to the front and actually has the resolving ability to render it—thrilling for analysis, but intense over long sessions.

Best for listeners who explicitly want maximum resolution and can handle a more energetic top end; less ideal for those seeking a laid-back or warm signature or a luxe unboxing. Price and intensity are the trade-offs; the payoff is one of the most resolving presentations available with a tonality that stays natural-leaning despite its brightness.


Crin original ranking

Crin Youtube Channel
Ad
Using this affiliate link for ordering your Softears RS10 or any other IEM helps fund our free service at no extra cost to you.

Price: $2,099

Buy Softears RS10 on HiFiGO

Softears RS10 reviewed by Precogvision

Precogvision 6.4 Reviewer Score
B Tuning
A- Tech
A slightly more resolving S8 at the expense of added grittiness and more upper-midrange.

Precogvision original ranking

Precogvision Youtube Channel
Bass: B Mids: B Treble: B Dynamics: B Details: S Imaging: A-

64 Audio Tia Trio reviewed by Precogvision

Precogvision 8.1 Reviewer Score
A+ Tuning
A+ Tech
Rich bass and out-of-head imaging.
Youtube Video Summary

The tia Trio mirrors 64 Audio’s flagship DNA at a lower price point ($2,299) with the same compact, lightweight aluminum build, generous tip selection, and a comfortable shell that suits smaller ears. Sonically it carries a present but well-judged bass shelf, adding a touch of warmth by settling around ~180Hz rather than the usual sub-bass focus. Crucially, the midrange corrects the Forte’s biggest flaw: upper mids aren’t hollowed out here. There’s a mild 1.5–3k dip (about 1–2dB), yet vocals and instruments remain properly contoured and far more natural and engaging without requiring EQ.

Up top, the Trio shows recognizable treble landmarks—an emphasis near 5k that can sound a bit shouty and another at 8k adding slight sizzle—tempered by the healthier mids, so the presentation is lively without becoming harsh. Treble extension is excellent, with “air” above 10k running a tad hot depending on taste. On technicalities, detail retrieval and image clarity track surprisingly close to both the Forte and Legend Evo; the soundstage is expansive for an IEM (strong depth and layering) though not as outsized as Forte, and imaging is accurate for music but not surgical enough for competitive FPS. Taken as a whole—and especially without EQ—the tia Trio feels like the more complete listen: a high-end IEM that preserves the fun while fixing the midrange, trading only a slice of stage grandeur for a much more balanced, recommendable experience.

Bass: S+ Mids: A- Treble: A- Dynamics: S Details: A+ Imaging: A+

Precogvision original ranking

Precogvision Youtube Channel

Softears RS10 (more reviews)

Softears RS10 reviewed by Yifang

Yifang 8 Reviewer Score
S- Tuning
A+ Tech

Softears RS10 reviewed by Gizaudio Axel

Gizaudio Axel 8 Reviewer Score
A+ Tuning
S- Tech
I prefer more bass. Great tuning with forward vocals and excellent detail. Unvented design, BA bass, and can be slightly shouty on some tracks.

Gizaudio Axel original ranking

Gizaudio Axel Youtube Channel

Softears RS10 reviewed by Tim Tuned

Tim Tuned 7.5 Reviewer Score
A Tuning
S Tech
BA timbre
Youtube Video Summary

Softears RS10 targets a Harman-leaning reference balance with a clean, studio-grade presentation: bass is tight and linear with modest mid-bass punch, prioritizing speed, texture, and separation over slam. The midrange sits neutral and coherent, giving vocals accurate body without bloom, while treble extends with air and micro-detail that spotlights room cues and trailing reverbs. Staging focuses on pinpoint imaging and layering more than sheer width, creating a precise, microscope-like view into mixes that rewards high-quality recordings.

On the flip side, the tuning’s discipline means sub-bass rumble and warmth are restrained, and the upper-treble focus can read energetic on hot masters. It excels for critical listening, fast genres, and complex arrangements where transient clarity matters, but bass-heads and those seeking plush note weight may prefer a richer set. Build and isolation are solid, comfort is stable for long sessions, and the overall package feels polished and technical—a premium, detail-first monitor for listeners who value accuracy over indulgence.

Bass: A- Mids: A+ Treble: S

Tim Tuned original ranking

Tim Tuned Youtube Channel

Softears RS10 reviewed by Jaytiss

Jaytiss 7.5 Reviewer Score
B+ Tuning
A- Tech
Nice iem, clean clear out of the box

Jaytiss original ranking

Jaytiss Youtube Channel
Mids: B Treble: A- Dynamics: C+ Soundstage: A+

Softears RS10 reviewed by Shuwa-T

Shuwa-T 6.9 Reviewer Score
B+ Tuning
A- Tech
check links for more info:

Shuwa-T original ranking

Shuwa-T Website

Bass: B+ Mids: B+ Treble: B+ Soundstage: A- Details: A+ Imaging: A-

Softears RS10 reviewed by Head-Fi.org

Head-Fi.org 8.5 * score rescaled + normalized
2 community members have rated the Softears RS10 at an average of 4.5/5 on Head-Fi. Overall sentiment: Outstanding.

URL to full Review

Head-Fi.org original ranking

64 Audio Tia Trio (more reviews)

64 Audio Tia Trio reviewed by Super* Review

Super* Review 10* * score rescaled + normalized
Youtube Video Summary

The tia Trio comes across as a hybrid with personality: rich, thick, and warm, with slightly forward treble that adds air without tipping into the harsher edge heard on the U18t. Vocals are pulled back, yet the presentation feels cohesive and surprisingly natural given its unconventional response. What really stands out is the depth and head-stage—a wraparound sense of space that feels more immersive than most peers, making guitar strums and ambient cues pop in a way that’s immediately engaging.

Despite the 1DD + 2BA configuration, bass isn’t a simple upgrade over the U12t’s BA low end; it carries a touch more body and plosive weight but can feel a bit slower and less refined. Still, detail retrieval punches well above the driver count, and the overall tuning—while relaxed in the mids—stays clean and exciting. With the usual 64 Audio caveats (no apex swapping here and a mediocre stock cable), the tia Trio earns a five-star verdict for its intoxicating stage and atmosphere, even if it’s not the safest all-rounder at its $2,300 price.


Super* Review original ranking

Super* Review Youtube Channel

64 Audio Tia Trio reviewed by Audionotions

Audionotions 9 Reviewer Score
Phenomenal bass texture and quality. Mids are good if not great - I don't have much to nitpick about them - good note weight and excellent clarity. Treble is very sparkly and airy though some may find it a bit too much - I think the extra spice actually helps with instruments like violins. Imaging isn't quite as precise as U12T but stage is just as large if not more so. Timbre is not exactly natural but it is very good and definitely not offensive at all. My subjective favorite IEM to date. This is without a doubt a colored listen but it is so satisfying. Makes U12T sound almost sterile. That said both are good counterpoints to each other.

Audionotions original ranking

Website (Audionotions)

64 Audio Tia Trio reviewed by Nymz

Nymz 8.3 Reviewer Score
A+ Tuning
S- Tech
Best bass texture ever. Gorgeous treble extension, stage and imaging. Coherency and timbre a bit off. Upper mids/lower treble could be better. As amazing as it is, I couldn't fully connect with it (musically). Price is the biggest con.

Nymz original ranking

Nymz Website

Bass: S+ Mids: A- Treble: A- Details: A+ Imaging: S

Softears RS10 User Review Score

Average User Scores

Average User Score: n/a

Based on 0 user reviews

No user reviews yet. Be the first one who writes a review!

64 Audio Tia Trio User Review Score

Average User Scores

Average User Score:

Based on 1 user reviews

7.9

Strongly Favorable

Softears RS10 Gaming Score

Gaming Score & Grade

  • The gaming score is prioritizing technical capabilities of the IEM (Separation, Layering, Soundstage) and good value.

Gaming Score

6.2

Gaming Grade

B

64 Audio Tia Trio Gaming Score

Gaming Score & Grade

  • The gaming score is prioritizing technical capabilities of the IEM (Separation, Layering, Soundstage) and good value.

Gaming Score

6.4

Gaming Grade

B

Softears RS10 Scorings

Average Technical & Tuning Grades

Average Tunign Grade

A-
  • Tuning lands in a pleasing sweet spot with mostly coherent frequency integration. Tonality stays consistent from track to track.

Average Technical Grade

A
  • You get a well-rounded technical package that keeps separation, detail, and staging in harmony. It's a solid middle ground between fun and fidelity.
Bass B+
You get a lively bass response that balances energy with discipline. It balances punch with respectable control.
Mids B+
Expect a confident midrange that keeps details audible without harshness. Acoustic arrangements sound engaging.
Treble A-
It provides outstanding treble finesse, balancing brightness and control gracefully. It's engaging yet remarkably controlled.
Dynamics B-
Dynamics feel competent, bringing energy without the finest detail. It carries energy without sounding aggressive.
Soundstage A
Excellent spatial presentation that is wide, deep, and tall with precise instrument placement. Width, depth, and height all feel expanded.
Details S-
The tiniest inflections pop into view as if spotlit within the mix. Low-level details feel magnified yet natural.
Imaging A-
You can literally point to where sounds originate across the stage. You can point to where sounds originate.
Gaming B
Decent spatial awareness for fundamental positioning. Creates satisfying atmosphere in story-driven games while handling basic directional cues. Bad value-to-cost for gaming purpose - not recommended

64 Audio Tia Trio Scorings

Average Technical & Tuning Grades

Average Tunign Grade

A
  • Tuning feels well executed, keeping a natural flow across the spectrum. Switching genres feels seamless.

Average Technical Grade

A+
  • It sounds refined and controlled, keeping instruments neatly separated with immersive staging. Busy arrangements remain neatly organized.
Bass S+
The bass is breathtaking, pairing thunderous impact with absolute precision. Every rumble is rendered with realism.
Mids A-
The mids sound lush and articulate, capturing emotion effortlessly. Strings and keys shimmer with realism.
Treble A-
It provides outstanding treble finesse, balancing brightness and control gracefully. It's engaging yet remarkably controlled.
Dynamics S
This is reference-grade dynamic performance with breathtaking realism. It mirrors live-music intensity perfectly.
Details A+
No subtlety is too small; the presentation exposes it all with composure. Complex tracks remain crystal clear.
Imaging S-
Exceptional imaging with holographic precision that creates a palpable sense of placement. It creates a near-holographic placement.
Gaming B
Decent spatial awareness for fundamental positioning. Creates satisfying atmosphere in story-driven games while handling basic directional cues. Bad value-to-cost for gaming purpose - not recommended

Softears RS10 User Reviews

Example User Posted on ...
0.0

"This is an example review"

Pros
  • Example pro 1
  • Example pro 2
Cons
  • Example con 1
  • Example con 2
No User-Reviews Yet

Share your experience and build your personal ranking list.

You need to be signed in to write your own review

64 Audio Tia Trio User Reviews

Share your experience and build your personal ranking list.

You need to be signed in to write your own review
W wpzdm
7.9

U12t with more techs. Its short nozzles require pushing tips as far down as possible so nozzles insert deeply into ear canals, achieving the famed bass texture; but then, female vocals become a bit harsh.

Pros
Bass energy. Treble extension.
Cons
Both bass and treble kinda "plastic" and not very refined, tho not as so as s12; may be due to the too thick/large image.

Find your next IEM:

IEM Finder Quiz

new
Use this quiz and answer a few questions to get your individual IEM recommendation list
(1/3) How much are you willing to spend on the IEM?
(2/3) Which sound characteristics are particularly important to you?
(3/3) Which tuning do you prefer?
You can select multiple options.
Buy

Footer