Softears RS10 [7.4/10]

Reviews (6), scores and comparisons for Softears RS10

IEMRanking.com Home Softears RS10

Average Reviewer Scores

Shuwa-T Precogvision
Tim Tuned Jaytiss
Gizaudio Axel Crin

Average Reviewer Score:

7.4

Generally Favorable

Average User Scores

Average User Score: n/a

Based on 0 user reviews

No user reviews yet. Be the first one who writes a review!

Gaming Score & Grade

  • The gaming score is prioritizing technical capabilities of the IEM (Separation, Layering, Soundstage) and good value.

Gaming Score

6.1

Gaming Grade

B

Reviews

Reviewed by: Gizaudio Axel

Gizaudio Axel 8 Reviewer Score
A+ Tuning
S- Tech
I prefer more bass. Great tuning with forward vocals and excellent detail. Unvented design, BA bass, and can be slightly shouty on some tracks.

Gizaudio Axel original ranking

Gizaudio Axel Youtube Channel

Reviewed by: Crin

Crin 8 Reviewer Score
A+ Tuning
A+ Tech
A little shouty and intense but very resolving and well-defined. A somewhat refined Moondrop S8.

Crin original ranking

Crin Youtube Channel

Reviewed by: Tim Tuned

Tim Tuned 7.5 Reviewer Score
A Tuning
S Tech

Reviewed by: Jaytiss

Jaytiss 7.5 Reviewer Score
B+ Tuning
A- Tech
Nice iem, clean clear out of the box

Jaytiss original ranking

Jaytiss Youtube Channel
Mids: B Treble: A- Dynamics: C+ Soundstage: A+

Reviewed by: Shuwa-T

Shuwa-T 6.9 Reviewer Score
B+ Tuning
A- Tech
check links for more info:

Shuwa-T original ranking

Shuwa-T Website

Bass: B+ Mids: B+ Treble: B+ Soundstage: A- Details: A+ Imaging: A-

Reviewed by: Precogvision

Precogvision 6.4 Reviewer Score
B Tuning
A- Tech
A slightly more resolving S8 at the expense of added grittiness and more upper-midrange.

Precogvision original ranking

Precogvision Youtube Channel
Bass: B Mids: B Treble: B Dynamics: B Details: S Imaging: A-

Tools

IEM Finder Quiz

new
Use this quiz and answer a few questions to get your individual IEM recommendation list
(1/2) How much are you willing to spend on the IEM?
(2/2) Which sound characteristics are particularly important to you?

Softears RS10 Infos

Compare Softears RS10 to popular alternatives

Compare two IEMs side by side
Name

VS

Name
IEM alt. Score
Softears RS10 vs. Thieaudio Valhalla
Thieaudio Valhalla offers better dynamics, bass and imaging.
8.9
Softears RS10 vs. Fiio FX17
Fiio FX17 offers better dynamics, imaging and bass.
8.9
Softears RS10 vs. Elysian Apostle
Elysian Apostle offers better dynamics, mids and soundstage.
8.9
Softears RS10 vs. Aful Dawn-X
Aful Dawn-X offers better bass, dynamics and mids.
8.8
Softears RS10 vs. Dunu Glacier
Dunu Glacier offers better dynamics, bass and soundstage.
8.7
Softears RS10 vs. 64 Audio U12t
64 Audio U12t offers better dynamics, imaging and bass.
8.5
Softears RS10 vs. 64 Audio Tia Trio
64 Audio Tia Trio offers better bass, dynamics and imaging.
8.5
Softears RS10 vs. Symphonium x Elise Audio Europa
Symphonium x Elise Audio Europa offers better dynamics, bass and mids.
8.5
Softears RS10 vs. Symphonium Crimson
Symphonium Crimson offers better bass, imaging and dynamics.
8.4
Softears RS10 vs. 64 Audio Volur
64 Audio Volur offers better dynamics.
8.4
Best IEMs from $2,000 - $4,000

Average Technical & Tuning Grades

Average Tunign Grade

A-
  • Pleasing tonal balance with good technical control. Minor quirks present but not distracting. Demonstrates decent genre versatility.

Average Technical Grade

A
  • Good technical performance. Clear separation and decent detail retrieval across various tracks. Soundstage shows reasonable width and depth.
Bass B+
Good bass foundation with decent impact. Maintains acceptable control while providing satisfying thump in most tracks.
Mids B+
Good midrange presence with solid clarity. Vocals are clear and instruments have reasonable texture and body.
Treble A-
Excellent treble: airy, extended and well-controlled. Great micro-detail retrieval without sibilance or harshness.
Dynamics B-
Decent dynamic performance. Good macro-contrast but micro-dynamics could be more nuanced. Satisfactory impact.
Soundstage A
Excellent spatial presentation - wide, deep and tall. Precise instrument placement with clear separation in all dimensions.
Details S-
Exceptional resolution that uncovers the deepest layers. Retrieves even the most minute details while maintaining natural timbre.
Imaging A-
Excellent imaging: precise and stable placement. Instruments occupy specific points in space with tangible positions.
Gaming B
Decent spatial awareness for fundamental positioning. Creates satisfying atmosphere in story-driven games while handling basic directional cues. Bad value-to-cost for gaming purpose - not recommended

User Reviews

Example User Posted on ...
0.0

"This is an example review"

Pros
  • Example pro 1
  • Example pro 2
Cons
  • Example con 1
  • Example con 2
No User-Reviews Yet

Share your experience and build your personal ranking list.

Footer