Softears Studio 4 VS Tipsy Dummer pro 4

IEM Comparison: Expert & Community Scores Side-by-Side

Home Ranking Compare IEMs

Softears Studio 4 and Tipsy Dummer pro 4 are in-ear monitors. Softears Studio 4 costs $450 while Tipsy Dummer pro 4 costs $399. Softears Studio 4 is $51 more expensive. Softears Studio 4 holds a decisive 1.7-point edge in reviewer scores (7.5 vs 5.8). Softears Studio 4 has significantly better mids with a 2.3-point edge, Softears Studio 4 has significantly better treble with a 4-point edge, Tipsy Dummer pro 4 has significantly better dynamics with a 1-point edge and Softears Studio 4 has significantly better soundstage with a 1-point edge.

Insights

Metric Softears Studio 4 Tipsy Dummer pro 4
Bass 6.5 5.8
Mids 7.3 5
Treble 7 3
Details 5 5.8
Soundstage 8 7
Imaging 5 5.8
Dynamics 5 6
Tonality 7.5 4.8
Technicalities 7.1 3
Take these comparisons with a grain of salt—we don't have enough Tipsy Dummer pro 4 reviews saved yet to provide an unbiased result.

Softears Studio 4 Aggregated Review Score

Average Reviewer Scores

Precogvision
Jays Audio Head-Fi.org
Super* Review Tim Tuned Jaytiss Gizaudio Axel

Average Reviewer Score:

7.5

Generally Favorable


Tipsy Dummer pro 4 Aggregated Review Score

Average Reviewer Scores

Jaytiss

Average Reviewer Score:

5.8

Mixed


Reviews Comparison

Softears Studio 4 reviewed by Jaytiss

Jaytiss 8 Reviewer Score
A- Tuning
A- Tech
Something magical about this set, but it's not the Bass.
Youtube Video Summary

Starry Edition brings a fresh faceplate to the Softears Studio 4 without changing the tuning. The translucent, slightly large shell seals firmly and delivers strong isolation; the only nit is a modest nozzle lip that still holds tips fine. Packaging leans “studio”: compact Pelican-style case, extension cable, tips, 6.3 mm adapter, and a soft black cable that feels nice but lacks a chin slider and terminates in 3.5 mm.

Sonically, this 4BA set is about clarity, air, and top-end extension—described as among the best heard under $800. Vocals come through vivid, mids are clean, and bass has a mild shelf: tasteful impact without bloat, though it’s not a slam machine. Expect excellent imaging, space, and detail; a touch of EQ can add weight if desired. It can be a bit source-picky: low output impedance sources suit it best, while a 10 Ω adapter pushes more treble and trims bass in a less pleasing way.

Against peers, Studio 4 is praised over Softears Twilight for air/extension (while acknowledging Twilight’s smooth DD charm) and over Volume for overall technicalities despite the small price gap. Versus RSV, Studio 4 avoids the RSV’s slight bass “muffle” and undercuts it on price; compared with Monarch MKII, it delivers a similar tonal aim without the occasional grain. Sets like Kiwi Ears 4, Truthear Hexa, and Binary Acoustics D Quattro trade blows on bass quantity versus air, but Studio 4’s upper-air detail and coherence make it a standout. At an often-seen street of ~$368, it’s framed as a benchmark sub-$500 pick and earns a full recommendation for listeners chasing articulate treble, lifelike vocals, and refined balance.

Mids: A+ Treble: A- Dynamics: C+ Soundstage: A+

Jaytiss original ranking

Jaytiss Youtube Channel
Ad
Using this affiliate link for ordering your Softears Studio 4 or any other IEM helps fund our free service at no extra cost to you.

Price: $449

Buy Softears Studio 4 on HiFiGO

Tipsy Dummer pro 4 reviewed by Jaytiss

Jaytiss 5.8 Reviewer Score
C Tuning
D Tech
check links for more info:

Jaytiss original ranking

Jaytiss Youtube Channel
Mids: C+ Treble: D Dynamics: B Soundstage: A-

Softears Studio 4 (more reviews)

Softears Studio 4 reviewed by Super* Review

Super* Review 8* * score rescaled + normalized
Youtube Video Summary

Softears Studio 4 arrives as a 4×BA set at $450 with a surprisingly practical kit: a Pelican-style water-resistant case, cleaning brush, MoonDrop-style tips, and—occasionally—a 3.5 mm extension with a 6.3 mm adapter (availability seems inconsistent). The build is sleek piano-black with a light, no-nonsense cable that behaves well but omits a chin cinch. Medium, semi-custom shells fit flush and isolate strongly thanks to an unvented design; the smooth nozzle lacks a lip, so tip choice matters, and seal can break if pressed from certain angles.

Tuning targets a neutral presentation with a sub-bass lift and slightly lean lower mids—clean, lively, and a touch bright without straying into fatigue. Standout traits are the wide stereo image and pinpoint imaging that make mixes feel like they’re dancing around the head. Treble is smooth and extended (think S8-like refinement), while BA bass proves surprisingly sturdy. Drawbacks are modest: a bit of BA timbre, less micro-texture than class leaders, and lighter note weight. Against peers, Dunu SA6 offers warmer neutral tonality with superior texture; Kiwi Ears Orchestra Lite plays thicker and more relaxed but less separated; Symphonium Meteor swings warm and bassy with a larger headstage and snappy treble. Verdict: a 4/5 for those who crave energetic neutrality, top-tier separation, and a studio-clean vibe that still feels fun.


Super* Review original ranking

Super* Review Youtube Channel

Softears Studio 4 reviewed by Tim Tuned

Tim Tuned 8 Reviewer Score
A+ Tuning
A+ Tech
Just great all around, balance with amazingly clean midrange

Tim Tuned original ranking

Tim Tuned Youtube Channel
Bass: A+ Mids: S Treble: S

Softears Studio 4 reviewed by Gizaudio Axel

Gizaudio Axel 8 Reviewer Score
S Tuning
A Tech
A benchmark for tonality and timbre. Neutral, accurate sound with great bass, tonal accuracy, forward vocals, and natural timbre. Excellent isolation. Unvented design and BA bass may not suit everyone.

Gizaudio Axel original ranking

Gizaudio Axel Youtube Channel

Softears Studio 4 reviewed by Jays Audio

Jays Audio 7.5 Reviewer Score
S- Tuning
A+ Tech
"Correct" and neutral tuning. Natural vocals, not as forward like RSV but zero faults. Slight Improvement over RSV in-terms of seapration and stage size/treble is same/not as warm.

Jays Audio original ranking

Jays Audio Youtube Channel

Softears Studio 4 reviewed by Precogvision

Precogvision 5 Reviewer Score
C+ Tuning
C+ Tech
Sounds plasticky and smoothed; inoffensive to the point of being offensive.

Precogvision original ranking

Precogvision Youtube Channel
Bass: C+ Mids: C+ Treble: C+ Dynamics: C+ Details: C+ Imaging: C+

Softears Studio 4 reviewed by Head-Fi.org

Head-Fi.org 7.9 * score rescaled + normalized
15 community members have rated the Softears Studio 4 at an average of 4.6/5 on Head-Fi. Overall sentiment: Outstanding.

URL to full Review

Head-Fi.org original ranking

Softears Studio 4 User Review Score

Average User Scores

Average User Score: n/a

Based on 0 user reviews

No user reviews yet. Be the first one who writes a review!

Tipsy Dummer pro 4 User Review Score

Average User Scores

Average User Score: n/a

Based on 0 user reviews

No user reviews yet. Be the first one who writes a review!

Softears Studio 4 Gaming Score

Gaming Score & Grade

  • The gaming score is prioritizing technical capabilities of the IEM (Separation, Layering, Soundstage) and good value.

Gaming Score

7

Gaming Grade

A-

Tipsy Dummer pro 4 Gaming Score

Gaming Score & Grade

  • The gaming score is prioritizing technical capabilities of the IEM (Separation, Layering, Soundstage) and good value.

Gaming Score

3.3

Gaming Grade

D

Softears Studio 4 Scorings

Average Technical & Tuning Grades

Average Tunign Grade

A
  • Tuning feels well executed, keeping a natural flow across the spectrum. Switching genres feels seamless.

Average Technical Grade

A-
  • The presentation feels orderly, balancing workable detail retrieval with acceptable imaging cues. It keeps momentum without smearing transients.
Bass B+
Bass foundation is good, adding satisfying punch without losing control. Pop and rock tracks feel lively.
Mids A-
Expect lifelike vocals and instruments with impressive nuance and realism. You can easily follow harmonies and backups.
Treble A-
Expect effortless extension and clarity that keep the top end sparkling yet smooth. Layering in upper registers is impressive.
Dynamics C+
It offers fair punch and contrast, though micro-dynamics could be sharper. Impact is satisfying for day-to-day use.
Soundstage A+
Immersive holography surrounds the listener, making the venue feel tangible and enveloping. It delivers a grand, cinematic presentation.
Details C+
The mix feels articulate, yet the tiniest ripples don't always sparkle. Background ambience is reasonably clear.
Imaging C+
The stage feels orderly, guiding your ear across positions without confusion. Depth layering is hinted and believable.
Gaming A-
Good fundamental spatial awareness for most gaming scenarios. Handles basic positioning well but may lack nuance in complex situations. Value-to-cost may not be optimal for gaming-focused users.

Tipsy Dummer pro 4 Scorings

Average Technical & Tuning Grades

Average Tunign Grade

C
  • Tonality remains inconsistent, with uneven peaks and dips that disrupt musical flow. You'll constantly notice peaks or dips pulling focus.

Average Technical Grade

D
  • Textural information blurs together, making the stage feel pinched and gray. Instrument edges blur together frequently.
Mids C+
The mids are solid and dependable, though not especially remarkable. Vocals stay reasonably grounded in the mix.
Treble D
Highs feel erratic, with dips and spikes that make the signature unpredictable. It alternates between splashy and dull.
Dynamics B
You get confident dynamics that track both macro swings and rhythmic drive. There's life in every crescendo.
Soundstage A-
Excellent spatial presentation that is wide, deep, and tall with precise instrument placement. Width, depth, and height all feel expanded.
Gaming D
Compromised imaging significantly impacts gameplay awareness. Directional cues often lack accuracy or consistency. Value-to-cost may not be optimal for gaming-focused users.

Softears Studio 4 User Reviews

Example User Posted on ...
0.0

"This is an example review"

Pros
  • Example pro 1
  • Example pro 2
Cons
  • Example con 1
  • Example con 2
No User-Reviews Yet

Share your experience and build your personal ranking list.

You need to be signed in to write your own review

Tipsy Dummer pro 4 User Reviews

Example User Posted on ...
0.0

"This is an example review"

Pros
  • Example pro 1
  • Example pro 2
Cons
  • Example con 1
  • Example con 2
No User-Reviews Yet

Share your experience and build your personal ranking list.

You need to be signed in to write your own review

Find your next IEM:

IEM Finder Quiz

new
Use this quiz and answer a few questions to get your individual IEM recommendation list
(1/3) How much are you willing to spend on the IEM?
(2/3) Which sound characteristics are particularly important to you?
(3/3) Which tuning do you prefer?
You can select multiple options.
Buy

Footer