Sony IER Z1R VS FATfreq x Effect Audio: Quantum

IEM Comparison: Expert & Community Scores Side-by-Side

Home Ranking Compare IEMs

Sony IER Z1R and FATfreq x Effect Audio: Quantum are in-ear monitors. Sony IER Z1R costs $1,700 while FATfreq x Effect Audio: Quantum costs $770. Sony IER Z1R is $930 more expensive. Sony IER Z1R holds a decisive 1.2-point edge in reviewer scores (8.1 vs 7). Sony IER Z1R has significantly better bass with a 2-point edge, Sony IER Z1R has significantly better mids with a 1.8-point edge, Sony IER Z1R has significantly better treble with a 2.8-point edge, FATfreq x Effect Audio: Quantum has significantly better dynamics with a 1.8-point edge, Sony IER Z1R has significantly better soundstage with a 1.5-point edge, Sony IER Z1R has significantly better details with a 1.4-point edge and Sony IER Z1R has significantly better imaging with a 3.1-point edge.

Insights

Metric Sony IER Z1R FATfreq x Effect Audio: Quantum
Bass 9.5 7.5
Mids 6.8 5
Treble 7.8 5
Details 7.4 6
Soundstage 8 6.5
Imaging 8.6 5.5
Dynamics 7.3 9
Tonality 8.1 7
Technicalities 8.1 7.5

Sony IER Z1R Aggregated Review Score

Average Reviewer Scores

Smirk Audio Precogvision Shuwa-T Tim Tuned
Yifang Crin Nymz
Super* Review Jays Audio

Average Reviewer Score:

8.1

Very Positive


FATfreq x Effect Audio: Quantum Aggregated Review Score

Average Reviewer Scores

Shuwa-T
Audio Amigo
Kois Archive Jaytiss Jays Audio Head-Fi.org

Average Reviewer Score:

7

Cautiously Favorable


Reviews Comparison

Sony IER Z1R reviewed by Jays Audio

Jays Audio 9 Reviewer Score
S Tuning
S Tech
Best of the best in most areas, but vocals and mids can be thin due to fit issues. Insane bass texture/detail and HUGE soundstage. One of the best trebles I've heard.

Jays Audio original ranking

Jays Audio Youtube Channel

FATfreq x Effect Audio: Quantum reviewed by Jays Audio

Jays Audio 7 Reviewer Score
A- Tuning
S Tech
Bright and full sound, very detailed, sparkly, airy, tons of treble extenstion... but it gets fatiguing with the stock filters. Blue filter has the best balance but still doesn't scale too well. 300 mesh filter goes hard tho - check modded ranking at bottom.

Jays Audio original ranking

Jays Audio Youtube Channel

Sony IER Z1R reviewed by Shuwa-T

Shuwa-T 7.9 Reviewer Score
A Tuning
A+ Tech
Fun sounding without going overboard with the subbass, organic timbre The fit is atrocious, treble can get spicy on hi-hats

Shuwa-T original ranking

Shuwa-T Website

Bass: S- Mids: A Treble: A- Soundstage: A+ Details: S- Imaging: A+

FATfreq x Effect Audio: Quantum reviewed by Shuwa-T

Shuwa-T 5.7 Reviewer Score
B- Tuning
B- Tech
I struggle with this, perhaps it was insertion depth but that unconventional iem shape should never have been greenlit Average bass, thin midrange, unbearably sibilant treble

Shuwa-T original ranking

Shuwa-T Website

Bass: A Mids: C+ Treble: C- Soundstage: B Details: B Imaging: B-

Sony IER Z1R (more reviews)

Sony IER Z1R reviewed by Super* Review

Super* Review 9* * score rescaled + normalized

Sony IER Z1R reviewed by Yifang

Yifang 8 Reviewer Score
A+ Tuning
A+ Tech

Sony IER Z1R reviewed by Crin

Crin 8 Reviewer Score
A+ Tuning
S- Tech
Extended yet natural treble, realistic sub-bass focus and spacious imaging capabilities.
Youtube Video Summary

Sony’s IER-Z1R goes full luxury flex: an over-the-top unboxing with nested boxes, a ring-case display, two stock cables (3.5 mm SE and 4.4 mm balanced), and a mountain of tips. The shells are solid metal and surprisingly heavy, feeling like they could survive a drop—or crack a desk. Driver count is “only” three, but the focus is on large dynamic drivers rather than BA stuffing; build and presentation scream premium from the first lift of the lid.

Sonically, the headline is the bass: deep, rumbly, clean, and fast, delivering both sub-bass rumble and well-separated hits—described as the best bass heard from a universal IEM. The midrange has a thicker, weighty character that plays nicer with brighter voices and pop than with male vocals or cello, which can feel a touch heavy. The treble is fit-dependent: a deep seal nets a smooth, extended top end; a shallow fit can tilt peaky and splashy—so ear anatomy and tip choice matter more than usual.

On source pairing, the IER-Z1R scales on a beefy amp but runs just fine off an Apple dongle, undermining fears that it’s a diva. As for value, the verdict is blunt: performance is stellar, but not cost-efficient; similar results can be had for half or even a quarter of the price. This set targets listeners chasing the last 10–20% of performance (or those who simply want the full Sony flagship experience), with the caveat that fit decides whether the treble sings or stings.


Crin original ranking

Crin Youtube Channel

Sony IER Z1R reviewed by Nymz

Nymz 8 Reviewer Score
A+ Tuning
A+ Tech
Recessed mids I can't approved but best bass tactility I've heard. One of the best stage I've heard. Top of the class treble. Fit is a massive problem for most - one of those that needs to be demoed before pressing checkout.

Nymz original ranking

Nymz Website

Bass: S+ Mids: B Treble: A+ Details: A- Imaging: S

Sony IER Z1R reviewed by Smirk Audio

Smirk Audio 7.9 Reviewer Score
A+ Tuning
A Tech
Visceral, hard-hitting bass, sparkly treble, and a large, spherical soundstage with impressive height. Fit may pose a challenge for many. Cons: Poor fit.

Smirk Audio original ranking

Smirk Audio Head-Fi Profile

Bass: S Mids: A Treble: A+ Dynamics: A Details: A- Imaging: S-

Sony IER Z1R reviewed by Precogvision

Precogvision 7.9 Reviewer Score
A+ Tuning
A Tech
Top-tier bass, treble, and soundstage height and width. I don't approve of the midrange these days.
Youtube Video Summary

Sony’s IER-Z1R puts on a proper flagship show from the jump: an exquisite unboxing, hefty zirconium shells, and faceplates with a watch-grade finish that scream luxury. Sonically, the focus is the sub-bass—massive extension, physical rumble, and satisfying decay that together form a true basshead endgame. Compared to the 64 Audio U12t, the Z1R’s low end is clearly superior in slam and texture, while avoiding plasticky BA timbre; resolution is strong overall, even if the U12t keeps a slight edge in microdetail.

The tuning skews moderately V-shaped: male vocals can sound a touch hollow from a dip around the lower mids, whereas female vocals pop with presence and clarity—ideal for J-/K-pop and anime OSTs. Treble carries good extension but emphasizes stick impact that can draw attention over the air up top, a preference call more than a flaw. Staging is notable: among IEMs, the Z1R projects a “speaker-like” scale with one of the widest head-stages heard—still IEM-bound, but grander than most peers, and paired with a warm, engaging timbre.

The catch is fit and ergonomics. The shells are large and unforgiving, and for many ears comfort collapses within minutes; seal is extremely sensitive, with a poor fit turning the treble peaky around ~6 kHz. It’s the single biggest caveat: audition first rather than blind-buying. When the fit cooperates, this is a phenomenal-sounding flagship—arguably preferred over U12t for the right genres—yet its brilliance is undercut by comfort risks that will be a deal-breaker for some.

Bass: S+ Mids: B Treble: A+ Dynamics: A- Details: A- Imaging: S

Precogvision original ranking

Precogvision Youtube Channel

Sony IER Z1R reviewed by Tim Tuned

Tim Tuned 7.5 Reviewer Score
A Tuning
A+ Tech
Incredible extensions on both ends Lower midrange

Tim Tuned original ranking

Tim Tuned Youtube Channel
Bass: S+ Mids: A- Treble: A+

FATfreq x Effect Audio: Quantum (more reviews)

FATfreq x Effect Audio: Quantum reviewed by Kois Archive

Kois Archive 7.8 Reviewer Score
S- Tuning
S Tech
Rating: A+ | Value: ⭐ | Gaming: 🎮🎮🎮 | Comfort: 4 very technical. wide. well tuned planar grainy treble due to the air

Kois Archive original ranking

Kois Archive Youtube Channel

FATfreq x Effect Audio: Quantum reviewed by Jaytiss

Jaytiss 7.8 Reviewer Score
B+ Tuning
B Tech
I don't want to like, but I love.

Jaytiss original ranking

Jaytiss Youtube Channel
Mids: C+ Treble: B Dynamics: S Soundstage: A-

FATfreq x Effect Audio: Quantum reviewed by Audio Amigo

Audio Amigo 6 * score rescaled + normalized
An interesting sort of Science Project IEM. FatFreq tried to extract as much Sub-bass power and texture while making an airy, detailed planar that isn't fatiguing. They succeeded, and with the Super Stage NOAH modules, this is the most open and wide sounding single Planar I've ever heard. Wish it was cheaper and didn't come with the Ares S II cable.

Audio Amigo original ranking

Audio Amigo Youtube Channel

FATfreq x Effect Audio: Quantum reviewed by Head-Fi.org

Head-Fi.org 7.5 * score rescaled + normalized
2 community members have rated the FATfreq x Effect Audio: Quantum at an average of 4.0/5 on Head-Fi. Overall sentiment: Very Positive.

URL to full Review

Head-Fi.org original ranking

Sony IER Z1R User Review Score

Average User Scores

Average User Score: n/a

Based on 0 user reviews

No user reviews yet. Be the first one who writes a review!

FATfreq x Effect Audio: Quantum User Review Score

Average User Scores

Average User Score: n/a

Based on 0 user reviews

No user reviews yet. Be the first one who writes a review!

Sony IER Z1R Gaming Score

Gaming Score & Grade

  • The gaming score is prioritizing technical capabilities of the IEM (Separation, Layering, Soundstage) and good value.

Gaming Score

6.6

Gaming Grade

B+

FATfreq x Effect Audio: Quantum Gaming Score

Gaming Score & Grade

  • The gaming score is prioritizing technical capabilities of the IEM (Separation, Layering, Soundstage) and good value.

Gaming Score

6.8

Gaming Grade

B+

Sony IER Z1R Scorings

Average Technical & Tuning Grades

Average Tunign Grade

A+
  • Expect a tasteful, well-judged response that feels both musical and true to the source. Great synergy with a wide range of genres.

Average Technical Grade

A+
  • You get an articulate, polished performance with immersive stage depth and great control. There's a sense of polish across the whole spectrum.
Bass S
Expect a flagship-caliber bass presentation that defines impact, texture, and depth. Power never compromises precision.
Mids B+
The mids are articulate and well-balanced, lending body to instruments. Instrument layering remains stable.
Treble A
It provides outstanding treble finesse, balancing brightness and control gracefully. It's engaging yet remarkably controlled.
Dynamics A-
Expect excellent punch and micro-detail that render rhythmic shifts effortlessly. It keeps up with complex rhythmic swings.
Soundstage A+
Three-dimensional layering becomes effortless, placing performers on a lifelike virtual stage. Venue ambience wraps around convincingly.
Details A-
Resolution feels both high and relaxed, capturing nuance with ease. There's zero smearing even at high volume.
Imaging S-
The stage breathes like a real environment, surrounding you with believable depth. There's a strong sensation of physical space.
Gaming B+
Respectable environmental presentation favors atmosphere over precision. Detects obvious directional cues while conveying game world ambiance. Bad value-to-cost for gaming purpose - not recommended

FATfreq x Effect Audio: Quantum Scorings

Average Technical & Tuning Grades

Average Tunign Grade

A-
  • Tuning lands in a pleasing sweet spot with mostly coherent frequency integration. Tonality stays consistent from track to track.

Average Technical Grade

A
  • You get a controlled, composed performance, marrying decent clarity with a still-modest sense of space. A safe technical performer for the price bracket.
Bass A
Expect a commanding bass response that reaches deep without clouding the mix. There's both slam and nuance in equal measure.
Mids C+
The mids are solid and dependable, though not especially remarkable. Vocals stay reasonably grounded in the mix.
Treble C+
Highs come through with reasonable clarity while staying mostly smooth. Sibilance is mostly controlled.
Dynamics S
This is reference-grade dynamic performance with breathtaking realism. It mirrors live-music intensity perfectly.
Soundstage B+
A satisfying balance of width and depth yields a stage that feels organized and engaging. Imaging lines up with the intended mix.
Details B
Finer gestures snap into focus without sounding clinical or forced. Layering holds strong across genres.
Imaging B-
A stable phantom center appears, lending vocals a consistent anchor. It maintains a coherent phantom center.
Gaming B+
Respectable environmental presentation favors atmosphere over precision. Detects obvious directional cues while conveying game world ambiance. Bad value-to-cost for gaming purpose - not recommended

Sony IER Z1R User Reviews

Example User Posted on ...
0.0

"This is an example review"

Pros
  • Example pro 1
  • Example pro 2
Cons
  • Example con 1
  • Example con 2
No User-Reviews Yet

Share your experience and build your personal ranking list.

You need to be signed in to write your own review

FATfreq x Effect Audio: Quantum User Reviews

Example User Posted on ...
0.0

"This is an example review"

Pros
  • Example pro 1
  • Example pro 2
Cons
  • Example con 1
  • Example con 2
No User-Reviews Yet

Share your experience and build your personal ranking list.

You need to be signed in to write your own review

Find your next IEM:

IEM Finder Quiz

new
Use this quiz and answer a few questions to get your individual IEM recommendation list
(1/3) How much are you willing to spend on the IEM?
(2/3) Which sound characteristics are particularly important to you?
(3/3) Which tuning do you prefer?
You can select multiple options.

Footer