Subtonic STORM VS Crinear Meta

IEM Comparison: Expert & Community Scores Side-by-Side

Home Ranking Compare IEMs

Subtonic STORM and Crinear Meta use 5BA+2EST+2SLAM and 1DD+2BA driver setups respectively. Subtonic STORM costs $5,200 while Crinear Meta costs $250. Subtonic STORM is $4,950 more expensive. Subtonic STORM holds a decisive 1.8-point edge in reviewer scores (9.1 vs 7.3). Subtonic STORM has significantly better bass with a 1.7-point edge, Subtonic STORM has better mids with a 0.9-point edge, Subtonic STORM has significantly better treble with a 1.2-point edge, Subtonic STORM has significantly better dynamics with a 2.5-point edge, Subtonic STORM has significantly better details with a 2.7-point edge and Subtonic STORM has significantly better imaging with a 2-point edge.

Insights

Metric Subtonic STORM Crinear Meta
Bass 8.7 7
Mids 8.4 7.5
Treble 8.7 7.5
Details 9.7 7
Soundstage 9.5 7.3
Imaging 9 7
Dynamics 9.5 7
Tonality 9 7.7
Technicalities 9.2 7.5

Subtonic STORM Aggregated Review Score

Average Reviewer Scores

Smirk Audio Bad Guy Good Audio
Shuwa-T Precogvision Tim Tuned Gizaudio Axel IEMRanking AI
Jays Audio

Average Reviewer Score:

9.1

Outstanding


Crinear Meta Aggregated Review Score

Average Reviewer Scores

Jays Audio Smirk Audio Z-Reviews Audionotions
Super* Review

Average Reviewer Score:

7.3

Generally Favorable


Reviews Comparison

Subtonic STORM reviewed by Jays Audio

Jays Audio 10 Reviewer Score
S+ Tuning
S+ Tech
The best IEM I've ever heard. Best timbre. Super natural. TOTL tech. It's just good. That's all.

Most IEMs inevitably introduce flaws that shatter musical immersion—be it harsh treble, shouty vocals, or unbalanced bass. These imperfections act as chains, binding the listener and preventing that elusive state of pure, uninterrupted freedom within the music. While the OG EJ07 came close, even it faltered on certain tracks, its forward vocals becoming a jarring distraction when pushed hard. The Subtonic Storm, however, shatters this pattern entirely.

Contrary to its name, the Storm represents the eye of the hurricane—a sanctuary of pure, effortless sound. It liberates the music from tuning flaws, presenting it naturally and tranquilly. There are zero distractions or attachments holding the listener back, enabling deep introspection and complete immersion, as if conversing directly with the singer or instrument. This profound, intangible quality—achieving that free state—is why it's considered the best IEM, offering unmatched resolution, separation, and imaging, albeit at an astronomical $5,000 price point.

Value-wise, the Storm is undeniably terrible; the KZ ASF ($250) gets you 80% there, and the Monarch MKII ($1,000) delivers 95%. It's a luxury item, justified only by its unique, unmeasurable ability to dissolve worldly distractions and forge total oneness with the music. Crucially, it's not for everyone: Bass heads, background listeners, or those enjoying J-pop/K-pop/EDM will find far better value elsewhere under $300. Only those deeply seeking musical transcendence, with ample disposable income, should even consider it. For everyone else, stay away—you simply don’t need it.


Jays Audio original ranking

Jays Audio Youtube Channel

Crinear Meta reviewed by Jays Audio

Jays Audio 7.5 Reviewer Score
A+ Tuning
A+ Tech
Bright-leaning all-rounder with sparkly treble sauce. Great tech for price and great accessories. Good coloration that's not vanilla and safe as other crin collabs. Can be fatiguing at higher volumes, tip dependent, rec sancai wide/regular or Softear Ultra Clear/EPZ clear tips.

CrinEar Meta lands as a clean, balanced, slightly bright-leaning all-rounder with a distinctly sparkly treble. The top end carries a “special sauce” — sharp attack, quick decay, airy cymbal splash and strong micro-detail — creating an open sense of space with tidy separation and layering at around mid-volume (~65 dB). Bass and vocals sit at a “normal” distance: clear and resolving but not emphasized; expect punch rather than deep sub-bass rumble or chesty slam. Fit is tip-dependent: stock silicones can sound peaky; clear soft EPZ tips keep the shimmer without harshness, while “white” Tongu Senai tips smooth the treble further.

Technically, Meta punches above its $250 bracket, hanging with sets like Dusk 3.5 and Estrella for resolution and imaging despite not using ESTs. Timbre stays natural and the build/accessories feel solid. Trade-offs appear when cranking volume: the treble rise can turn fatiguing past ~75–80 dB, especially on bright, electronic-leaning tracks. Genre picks lean toward pop, J-/K-pop, rock, metal, and indie instrumentals at mid-volumes, where the upper-mid cut reins in hot mixes and the sparkle makes cymbals addictive; for hip-hop/rap/EDM, some will want more rumble, slam, and note weight.

Versus Ziigaat Estrella, it’s apples to oranges: Estrella brings more low-end authority and smoother treble with vocals popping forward, while Meta counters with a brighter, sparklier presentation better for K-/J-pop and bands. Against other bright-neutral sets (Dusk, P5+2, Brain Dance), Meta sounds fuller in the low end with a more natural, less sizzly treble; compared to Canon Pro, it’s the more energetic and less laid-back choice. For pure vocals, Volume S, EPZ P50, or Cadenza 4 remain stronger. Scaling champs like Ziigaat Odyssey and AFUL Explorer take higher volumes better but trade away some of Meta’s detail sparkle. Limited-run caveat aside, this is an easy recommendation for listeners wanting a balanced daily driver with distinct, glittery treble at sensible listening levels.


Jays Audio original ranking

Jays Audio Youtube Channel

Subtonic STORM reviewed by Smirk Audio

Smirk Audio 8.8 Reviewer Score
S- Tuning
S Tech
World-class resolution and layering. Extreme, almost exaggerated dynamics. Staging is large but not class-leading.

Smirk Audio original ranking

Smirk Audio Head-Fi Profile

Bass: S- Mids: S- Treble: S- Dynamics: S Details: S Imaging: S-

Crinear Meta reviewed by Smirk Audio

Smirk Audio 7.1 Reviewer Score
A- Tuning
A- Tech
check links for more info:

Smirk Audio original ranking

Smirk Audio Head-Fi Profile

Bass: A- Mids: A Treble: A Dynamics: A- Details: A- Imaging: A-

Subtonic STORM (more reviews)

Subtonic STORM reviewed by Shuwa-T

Shuwa-T 9.3 Reviewer Score
S Tuning
S Tech
Comment: TOTL tuning with TOTL technicalities to boot. Perfectly tuned, unparalled detail retrieval, staging, imaging, and proper holographic background as a cohesive package The price I guess

Shuwa-T original ranking

Shuwa-T Website

Bass: S Mids: S Treble: S Soundstage: S Details: S Imaging: S

Subtonic STORM reviewed by Precogvision

Precogvision 9.1 Reviewer Score
S- Tuning
S Tech
Easily at the top for resolution and dynamic contrast, accompanied by rigid transients and pinpoint layering.

Precogvision original ranking

Precogvision Youtube Channel
Bass: S Mids: A+ Treble: S Dynamics: S+ Details: S+ Imaging: S

Subtonic STORM reviewed by Tim Tuned

Tim Tuned 9 Reviewer Score
S Tuning
S Tech
The most extraodinary normal sounding IEM ever. Amazing all-around big and heavy shell

Subtonic STORM closes the list as the ultra-high-end, “one-and-done” pick—the kind of most expensive flagship that needs no hype because the name says it all. Chosen for a “versatile” roundup, it’s framed as the endgame option for those who want a single IEM to cover everything and have the budget to match—cue the playful “rich boys” jab.

The verdict is equal parts praise and pragmatism: demo first. STORM isn’t a blind-buy, and the price is so stratospheric it gets the tongue-in-cheek advice to sell a car, a house, or a kidney. In short, a summit-fi statement piece with serious one-set potential—but only after making sure the tuning truly clicks.

Bass: S Mids: S Treble: S

Tim Tuned original ranking

Tim Tuned Youtube Channel

Subtonic STORM reviewed by Gizaudio Axel

Gizaudio Axel 9 Reviewer Score
S Tuning
S+ Tech
The most detailed IEM I’ve ever heard. Exceptional resolution, neutral sound signature. Hard to drive.

Gizaudio Axel original ranking

Gizaudio Axel Youtube Channel

Subtonic STORM reviewed by Bad Guy Good Audio

Bad Guy Good Audio 8.1 Reviewer Score
A+ Tuning
A- Tech
Technical excellence (accuracy). Near perfect tuning. Bass...great Price. Wait.

Subtonic STORM lands as a $5,200 flagship built around novel SLAM balanced-armature tech: the dual BA “subwoofer” and “woofer” are separated and crossed over independently, joined by a regular BA mid-woofer, additional BA mids, BA mid-tweeter and tweeter, plus two ESTnine drivers total with a seven-point crossover. The result isn’t just another spec sheet; it’s a system that behaves like a rethought low-end engine that sets up everything above it.

On music, the bass ranks an honest 8/10 because it doesn’t sound like typical BA bass—there’s real weight without mid bleed, so male/female vocals, strings, and guitars stay pristine. Complex tracks reveal studio fingerprints: the 38 Hz triple drop on Big Boi’s “Kill Jill” slams; the glockenspiel in Springsteen’s “Born to Run” is crystal; Pink Floyd’s “On the Run” left-right sweeps and the early gate announcement snap into focus; Hendrix’s uneven production becomes obvious; and the Led Zeppelin IV kick-drum intro hits with the produced, swirling authority it should. From Vivaldi to hip-hop, it just handles the library.

Stage is spacious and speaker-like off good sources, with positional cues that outclass sets like Elysian Annihilator and even edge the Fatfreq Grand Maestro for resolution, stage, and tonality—though Grand Maestro’s multi-tuning keeps it competitive. Ignore treble “hacksaw” graph takes and target-chasing; the performance argues against strict adherence to Harman-style curves. Diminishing returns are real, but for those chasing something genuinely different, the STORM’s reworked BA low end and refined EST top end deliver a uniquely authoritative, all-genre presentation that’s hard to unhear.

Bass: A+ Mids: A- Treble: A+

URL to full Review

Bad Guy Good Audio original ranking

Bad Guy Good Audio Youtube Channel

Subtonic STORM reviewed by IEMRanking AI

IEMRanking AI 9.5 Reviewer Score
S Tuning
S+ Tech

The Subtonic Storm delivers a balanced sound signature characterized by a generous sub-bass boost, neutral midrange, and an elevated, articulate treble response. Its standout feature is the implementation of proprietary SLAM drivers—custom balanced armatures handling separate sub-bass and mid-bass frequencies—which produce exceptional slam and texture rivaling dynamic drivers. The treble exhibits deliberate, controlled peaks between 5-15kHz, contributing to vividness without harshness, though some listeners may note a slight roll-off past 16kHz.

Technically, the Storm sets a high bar with class-leading dynamics, micro-detail resolution, and driver coherence across its hybrid array. Staging offers strong width and depth but lacks a cohesive center image. Ergonomically, the titanium shells are bulky and heavy, causing fatigue during extended use, and the stock cable is often criticized for stiffness. Additionally, its low sensitivity demands powerful amplification, limiting portability.


Crinear Meta (more reviews)

Crinear Meta reviewed by Super* Review

Super* Review 8* * score normalized
Versus similar priced IEMs this is probably the IEM I would be buying. Very nice IEM and a little bit on the contrasty side.

CrinEar Project Meta lands as a genuinely significant release: a new brand from Crinacle at an aggressive $250, limited to a small run, with a compact metal shell that fits securely and comfortably. Accessories are sensible (two eartip sets, chunky but protective case), while the swappable termination cable looks great in black/copper yet feels too long and relies on a friction fit that can be cumbersome and a bit kink-prone. Logos are plain, but overall build and ergonomics impress; a slightly shorter tip can improve seal and sound.

Tuning targets the tilted diffuse-field “Meta” profile: essentially neutral from the mids up, coupled with a deliberate, mostly sub-bass boost. The result is more contrasty than many peers—dense low end plus a touch of upper-treble sparkle—without turning sharp or sibilant. Bass is the standout: tighter and more textured than typical “new-meta” sets, though still a hair elevated and capable of sounding heavy on bass-laden tracks. Vocals sit a bit relaxed rather than forward; timbre is excellent, imaging is incisive, and the stage favors depth over width. Tip rolling (slightly shorter or attenuating tips) can tame the sparkle and lock in the balance.

Against rivals, Meta consistently punches up: it edges EPZ P50 and Kiwi Ears K4 with cleaner bass and more transparent timbre; versus AFUL Performer P5+2/P7 it trades that set’s wider stage and vocal presence for better overall naturalness. Pricier options can still win on preference: Softears Volume S brings more addictive mid-bass physicality and forward vocals; HiSenior Mega5EST nails the low-contrast, open midrange (though with softer bass); and Moondrop × Crinacle Dusk remains more vocal-centric with greater lateral openness. Verdict: a solid 4/5 and likely the pick at its price—slightly V-tinged, expertly executed, and a very promising first step for CrinEar.


Super* Review original ranking

Super* Review Youtube Channel

Crinear Meta reviewed by Z-Reviews

2025-08-29
Z-Reviews 7 * score normalized

CrinEar Meta lands as a limited-run, $250 bass-tilted collab that’s already sold out—and feels like a “little baby bass monster” in the best way. Build is clean and understated: aluminum shells with rose-gold accents, a nice interchangeable cable, and an overbuilt hard case that embarrasses most sets at this price. The nozzles are chunky (think Chronicle’s Red/Daybreak vibes), so foam or “render”-style tips help with seal and comfort. Specs are oddly opaque—driver configuration isn’t listed anywhere—yet the package still screams more value than expected.

Tonally this is unapologetically V-shaped: elevated bass that punches on cue, crisp treble that reaches in and gets attention, and a clear midrange that can read V because the ends are lively. The stage is intimate/narrow, giving a “small loud room” energy that’s exciting but can trend fatiguing over long sessions. Crucially, it passes the body-movement test—put on a groove and there’s immediate “wiggly-wigglies”—where a safer, cleaner sibling like Daybreak can feel a bit too polite. Meta sounds less filtered, more gusto, more fun; Daybreak is the seat-belted version.

Chain matters: with spatial enhancement (think soundstage wideners on a fancy DAC), the main gripes fade and the presentation breathes, though even stock the tuning remains engaging and lively. Net take: this is the version of Daybreak many wish existed—more out of the box, more toe-tapping—so it gets the nod on sheer enjoyment. New? It was a steal at $250. Used around $200? No-brainer collector keep if that energetic, bass-forward V is the target.


Z-Reviews original ranking

Z-Reviews Youtube Channel

Crinear Meta reviewed by Audionotions

Audionotions 7 Reviewer Score
Similar to Moondrop Dusk (the non-Dusk collab with Crin) but a step down overall sonically (tonality and techs) but a step up in ergonomics and build quality. Unboxing experience is excellent and almost excessive, especially for the price. U-shaped tuning with a focus on deep and powerful bass and sparkly treble. It's an exciting listen and for a first entry from a new brand, it's quite commendable. That said, it lacks a bit of refinement and control on both ends of the frequency response. Bass quantity often overwhelms the mix and there is something odd in the treble that adds an aritificial shimmer that detracts from timbre. Mids are very nice but probably needs a bit more body to balance out the treble and bass. I'd suggest a broad eq down of the bass shelf and some toning down especially of the higher treble region. Previously Owned

Audionotions original ranking

Website (Audionotions)

Subtonic STORM User Review Score

Average User Scores

Average User Score: n/a

Based on 0 user reviews

No user reviews yet. Be the first one who writes a review!

Crinear Meta User Review Score

Average User Scores

Average User Score: n/a

Based on 0 user reviews

No user reviews yet. Be the first one who writes a review!

Subtonic STORM Gaming Score

Gaming Score & Grade

  • The gaming score is prioritizing technical capabilities of the IEM (Separation, Layering, Soundstage) and good value.

Gaming Score

7.6

Gaming Grade

A

Crinear Meta Gaming Score

Gaming Score & Grade

  • The gaming score is prioritizing technical capabilities of the IEM (Separation, Layering, Soundstage) and good value.

Gaming Score

7.5

Gaming Grade

A

Subtonic STORM Scorings

Average Technical & Tuning Grades

Average Tunign Grade

S
  • Highly polished technical execution. Excellent frequency synergy creates an immersive experience. Enhances musical content.

Average Technical Grade

S
  • Outstanding resolution and control. Effortlessly retrieves micro-details, with holographic staging and fast transients. Handles complexity with poise.
Bass S-
Excellent bass response - powerful yet controlled. Deep extension with authoritative slam while maintaining clarity.
Mids A+
Superb midrange that's rich and resolving. Exceptional transparency and micro-details with perfect vocal/instrument balance.
Treble S-
Superb treble: effortless extension with crystal clarity. Perfect balance of sparkle and smoothness with exceptional detail.
Dynamics S
Reference-class dynamics: perfect micro/macro contrast with lightning transients. Utterly realistic reproduction of musical energy.
Soundstage S
Reference-class soundstage: perfectly spherical presentation with infinite space. Utterly realistic instrument placement and venue reproduction.
Details S
Reference-class detail: microscopic resolution with perfect texture reproduction. Nothing is lost, revealing the absolute truth of the recording.
Imaging S
Reference-class imaging: perfectly pinpoint accuracy in 3D space. Utterly realistic placement with zero positional drift.
Gaming A
Clear spatial presentation handles directional cues effectively. Distinguishes key gameplay sounds while maintaining decent immersion. Bad value-to-cost for gaming purpose - not recommended

Crinear Meta Scorings

Average Technical & Tuning Grades

Average Tunign Grade

A
  • Well-executed tonal character. No major flaws with good technical control. Smooth presentation works with multiple genres.

Average Technical Grade

A
  • Good technical performance. Clear separation and decent detail retrieval across various tracks. Soundstage shows reasonable width and depth.
Bass A-
Strong, well-defined bass with good texture. Delivers satisfying punch and rumble without overwhelming other frequencies.
Mids A
Excellent midrange with natural timbre and great detail retrieval. Vocals are forward and emotive with lifelike instrument reproduction.
Treble A
Excellent treble: airy, extended and well-controlled. Great micro-detail retrieval without sibilance or harshness.
Dynamics A-
Excellent dynamics with great contrast and speed. Transients are crisp and micro-details are clearly articulated.
Details A-
Excellent detail retrieval: highly resolving without being clinical. Effortlessly reveals micro-details and textural subtleties.
Imaging A-
Excellent imaging: precise and stable placement. Instruments occupy specific points in space with tangible positions.
Gaming A
Clear spatial presentation handles directional cues effectively. Distinguishes key gameplay sounds while maintaining decent immersion. Value-to-cost may not be optimal for gaming-focused users.

Subtonic STORM User Reviews

Example User Posted on ...
0.0

"This is an example review"

Pros
  • Example pro 1
  • Example pro 2
Cons
  • Example con 1
  • Example con 2
No User-Reviews Yet

Share your experience and build your personal ranking list.

You need to be signed in to write your own review

Crinear Meta User Reviews

Example User Posted on ...
0.0

"This is an example review"

Pros
  • Example pro 1
  • Example pro 2
Cons
  • Example con 1
  • Example con 2
No User-Reviews Yet

Share your experience and build your personal ranking list.

You need to be signed in to write your own review

Find your next IEM:

IEM Finder Quiz

new
Use this quiz and answer a few questions to get your individual IEM recommendation list
(1/2) How much are you willing to spend on the IEM?
(2/2) Which sound characteristics are particularly important to you?

Footer