Tanchjim Oxygen VS EarAcoustics Hi End Max

IEM Comparison: Expert & Community Scores Side-by-Side

Home Ranking Compare IEMs
My Ranking My Favorites

Tanchjim Oxygen and EarAcoustics Hi End Max use 1DD and 3dd BA driver setups respectively. Tanchjim Oxygen costs $270 while EarAcoustics Hi End Max costs $289. EarAcoustics Hi End Max is $19 more expensive. EarAcoustics Hi End Max holds a slight 0.2-point edge in reviewer scores (6.3 vs 6.5). Tanchjim Oxygen has significantly better mids with a 1.6-point edge, Tanchjim Oxygen has significantly better dynamics with a 1-point edge and EarAcoustics Hi End Max has better soundstage with a 0.5-point edge.

Insights

Metric Tanchjim Oxygen EarAcoustics Hi End Max
Bass 5.8 6.5
Mids 6.6 5
Treble 5.9 6
Details 6 6.5
Soundstage 6.5 7
Imaging 6.2 6.5
Dynamics 6 5
Tonality 6.3 5.5
Technicalities 6.3 6

Tanchjim Oxygen Aggregated Review Score

Average Reviewer Scores

Nymz
Tim Tuned
Gizaudio Axel Crin Shuwa-T Precogvision
Super* Review

Average Reviewer Score:

6.3

Mixed to Positive

EarAcoustics Hi End Max Aggregated Review Score

Average Reviewer Scores

Jaytiss

Average Reviewer Score:

6.5

Cautiously Favorable

Reviews Comparison

Tanchjim Oxygen (more reviews)

Tanchjim Oxygen reviewed by Super* Review

Super* Review 8* * score normalized
check links for more info:

Super* Review original ranking

Super* Review Youtube Channel

Tanchjim Oxygen reviewed by Gizaudio Axel

Gizaudio Axel 6.5 Reviewer Score
A Tuning
B+ Tech
check links for more info:

Gizaudio Axel original ranking

Gizaudio Axel Youtube Channel

Tanchjim Oxygen reviewed by Crin

Crin 6.5 Reviewer Score
A Tuning
B+ Tech
One of the best-tuned DDs tuned somewhat to Harman. Defined and detailed.

Crin original ranking

Crin Youtube Channel

Tanchjim Oxygen reviewed by Shuwa-T

Shuwa-T 6.4 Reviewer Score
B Tuning
B+ Tech
Solid tuning, a more mature sounding Hana Forward upper midrange may not be for everyone

Shuwa-T original ranking

Shuwa-T Website

Bass: B Mids: B+ Treble: B Soundstage: B+ Details: A- Imaging: B+

Tanchjim Oxygen reviewed by Precogvision

Precogvision 6.1 Reviewer Score
B Tuning
B Tech
A better KXXS with slightly out-of-head imaging.

Precogvision original ranking

Precogvision Youtube Channel
Bass: C+ Mids: A- Treble: B Dynamics: B Details: B Imaging: A-

Tanchjim Oxygen reviewed by Tim Tuned

Tim Tuned 5.5 Reviewer Score
B- Tuning
A- Tech
Great energy for a harman signature

Tim Tuned original ranking

Tim Tuned Youtube Channel
Bass: A- Mids: A+ Treble: A-

Tanchjim Oxygen reviewed by Nymz

Nymz 4.9 Reviewer Score
C Tuning
C+ Tech
Great IEM for accoustics etc, but terrible fit. Tripowin Olina is the better option for almost a third of the price.

Nymz original ranking

Nymz Website

Bass: C+ Mids: C+ Treble: C Details: C+ Imaging: C+

EarAcoustics Hi End Max (more reviews)

EarAcoustics Hi End Max reviewed by Jaytiss

2025-07-25
Jaytiss 6.5 Reviewer Score
B- Tuning
B Tech
Strong V, not weak, STRONG. Not for mid heads.

Jaytiss original ranking

Jaytiss Youtube Channel
Mids: C+ Treble: B Dynamics: C+ Soundstage: A-
YouTube video thumbnail

Tanchjim Oxygen User Review Score

Average User Scores

Average User Score: n/a

Based on 0 user reviews

No user reviews yet. Be the first one who writes a review!

EarAcoustics Hi End Max User Review Score

Average User Scores

Average User Score: n/a

Based on 0 user reviews

No user reviews yet. Be the first one who writes a review!

Tanchjim Oxygen Gaming Score

Gaming Score & Grade

  • The gaming score is prioritizing technical capabilities of the IEM (Separation, Layering, Soundstage) and good value.

Gaming Score

6.3

Gaming Grade

B

EarAcoustics Hi End Max Gaming Score

Gaming Score & Grade

  • The gaming score is prioritizing technical capabilities of the IEM (Separation, Layering, Soundstage) and good value.

Gaming Score

5.9

Gaming Grade

B-

Tanchjim Oxygen Scorings

Average Technical & Tuning Grades

Average Tunign Grade

B
  • Generally enjoyable tonal character with some noticeable unevenness. Maintains listenability while showing room for refinement in frequency balance.

Average Technical Grade

B
  • Satisfactory technical performance. Handles basic detail retrieval adequately in most tracks. Maintains reasonable cohesion in simpler arrangements.
Bass B-
Average bass performance - present but unremarkable. Has reasonable texture but lacks depth and physicality.
Mids B+
Good midrange presence with solid clarity. Vocals are clear and instruments have reasonable texture and body.
Treble B-
Decent treble with acceptable extension and detail. Can sound slightly unrefined but avoids being harsh or sibilant.
Dynamics B
Good dynamic expression with solid impact. Handles volume contrasts well while maintaining good transient snap.
Soundstage B+
Good soundstage with proper width and depth. Instruments have clear positioning with reasonable front/back placement.
Details B
Good resolution with clear articulation of nuances. Reveals recording nuances and maintains clarity in complex passages.
Imaging B
Good imaging with precise instrument placement. Clear localization within the soundstage including front/back positioning.
Gaming B
Decent spatial awareness for fundamental positioning. Creates satisfying atmosphere in story-driven games while handling basic directional cues. Value-to-cost may not be optimal for gaming-focused users.

EarAcoustics Hi End Max Scorings

Average Technical & Tuning Grades

Average Tunign Grade

B-
  • Generally enjoyable tonal character with some noticeable unevenness. Maintains listenability while showing room for refinement in frequency balance.

Average Technical Grade

B
  • Satisfactory technical performance. Handles basic detail retrieval adequately in most tracks. Maintains reasonable cohesion in simpler arrangements.
Mids C+
Decent midrange performance - balanced but unremarkable. Adequate clarity for most genres without notable flaws.
Treble B
Good treble response - clear and detailed without fatigue. Well-extended with proper air and sparkle.
Dynamics C+
Decent dynamic performance. Good macro-contrast but micro-dynamics could be more nuanced. Satisfactory impact.
Soundstage A-
Excellent spatial presentation - wide, deep and tall. Precise instrument placement with clear separation in all dimensions.
Gaming B-
Moderate spatial presentation conveys general directionality. Suitable for casual play where precision isn't critical. Value-to-cost may not be optimal for gaming-focused users.

Tanchjim Oxygen User Reviews

Example User Posted on ...
0.0

"This is an example review"

Pros
  • Example pro 1
  • Example pro 2
Cons
  • Example con 1
  • Example con 2
No User-Reviews Yet

Share your experience and build your personal ranking list.

You need to be signed in to write your own review

EarAcoustics Hi End Max User Reviews

Example User Posted on ...
0.0

"This is an example review"

Pros
  • Example pro 1
  • Example pro 2
Cons
  • Example con 1
  • Example con 2
No User-Reviews Yet

Share your experience and build your personal ranking list.

You need to be signed in to write your own review

Find your next IEM:

IEM Finder Quiz

new
Use this quiz and answer a few questions to get your individual IEM recommendation list
(1/2) How much are you willing to spend on the IEM?
(2/2) Which sound characteristics are particularly important to you?
Buy

Footer