Kefine Delci VS Tinhifi T3+

IEM Comparison: Expert & Community Scores Side-by-Side

IEMRanking.com Home Compare IEMs

Kefine Delci and Tinhifi T3+ are in-ear monitors. Kefine Delci costs $59 while Tinhifi T3+ costs $70. Tinhifi T3+ is $11 more expensive. Kefine Delci holds a decisive 2.3-point edge in reviewer scores (6 vs 3.7). Kefine Delci has significantly better mids with a 1.8-point edge, Kefine Delci has better treble with a 0.8-point edge, Kefine Delci has significantly better dynamics with a 2-point edge and Kefine Delci has significantly better soundstage with a 1-point edge.

Insights

Metric Kefine Delci Tinhifi T3+
Bass 6 4
Mids 5 3.3
Treble 4 3.3
Details 6 4
Soundstage 6 5
Imaging 6 4.3
Dynamics 5 3
Tonality 6.2 4.5
Technicalities 5.2 4.4

Kefine Delci Aggregated Review Score

Average Reviewer Scores

Jaytiss Jays Audio
Gizaudio Axel
Z-Reviews

Average Reviewer Score:

6

Mixed to Positive


Tinhifi T3+ Aggregated Review Score

Average Reviewer Scores

Precogvision
Shuwa-T Jays Audio

Average Reviewer Score:

3.7

Poor


Kefine Delci User Review Score

Average User Scores

Average User Score: n/a

Based on 0 user reviews

No user reviews yet. Be the first one who writes a review!

Tinhifi T3+ User Review Score

Average User Scores

Average User Score: n/a

Based on 0 user reviews

No user reviews yet. Be the first one who writes a review!

Kefine Delci Gaming Score

Gaming Score & Grade

  • The gaming score is prioritizing technical capabilities of the IEM (Separation, Layering, Soundstage) and good value.

Gaming Score

5.5

Gaming Grade

B-

Tinhifi T3+ Gaming Score

Gaming Score & Grade

  • The gaming score is prioritizing technical capabilities of the IEM (Separation, Layering, Soundstage) and good value.

Gaming Score

4.4

Gaming Grade

C-

Kefine Delci Scorings

Average Technical & Tuning Grades

Average Tunign Grade

B
  • Generally enjoyable tonal character with some noticeable unevenness. Maintains listenability while showing room for refinement in frequency balance.

Average Technical Grade

C+
  • Satisfactory technical performance. Handles basic detail retrieval adequately in most tracks. Maintains reasonable cohesion in simpler arrangements.
Mids C+
Decent midrange performance - balanced but unremarkable. Adequate clarity for most genres without notable flaws.
Treble C-
Average treble performance - present but lacking refinement. Some graininess or splashiness affects clarity.
Dynamics C+
Decent dynamic performance. Good macro-contrast but micro-dynamics could be more nuanced. Satisfactory impact.
Soundstage B
Good soundstage with proper width and depth. Instruments have clear positioning with reasonable front/back placement.
Gaming B-
Moderate spatial presentation conveys general directionality. Suitable for casual play where precision isn't critical.

Tinhifi T3+ Scorings

Average Technical & Tuning Grades

Average Tunign Grade

C
  • Significantly flawed tuning. Noticeable frequency imbalances and unnatural timbre distract from music. Lacks versatility across recordings.

Average Technical Grade

C-
  • Limited resolution; finer nuances are masked. Soundstage feels narrow, and complex passages cause muddiness. Transitions lack finesse.
Bass C-
Subdued bass response that stays mostly in the background. Lacks energy and impact but maintains basic definition.
Mids D
Midrange is significantly uneven with coloration. Some frequencies are boosted while others are missing, creating an unnatural tone.
Treble D
Uneven treble response with noticeable peaks and dips. Can sound both dull and occasionally harsh simultaneously.
Dynamics D
Noticeably compressed dynamics. Musical expression suffers with weak transients and poor contrast between quiet and loud sections.
Soundstage C+
Decent spatial presentation with noticeable width. Some depth perception but height dimension remains underdeveloped.
Details C-
Average resolution - reveals basic elements but misses subtleties. Satisfactory for casual listening but lacks refinement.
Imaging C-
Average imaging - reasonable localization but lacks specificity. Instruments have general positions but lack pinpoint accuracy.
Gaming C-
Minimal environmental definition provides only general audio cues. Suitable for games where positioning isn't critical.

Tinhifi T3+ Reviews

Reviewed by: Shuwa-T

Shuwa-T 4.6 Reviewer Score
C- Tuning
C+ Tech
Comment: Too warm. Decent bass response, warm and relaxing Clarity and resolution, higher frequencies are not as defined

Shuwa-T original ranking

Shuwa-T Website

Bass: C- Mids: C Treble: D+ Soundstage: C+ Details: C+ Imaging: B-

Reviewed by: Jays Audio

Jays Audio 4 Reviewer Score
B+ Tuning
C+ Tech

Reviewed by: Precogvision

Precogvision 2.6 Reviewer Score
D Tuning
D Tech
Low-level detailing and cheap timbre from the midrange and up with barely passable tonal balance.

Precogvision original ranking

Precogvision Youtube Channel
Bass: C- Mids: E+ Treble: D Dynamics: D Details: D Imaging: D

Kefine Delci User Reviews

Example User Posted on ...
0.0

"This is an example review"

Pros
  • Example pro 1
  • Example pro 2
Cons
  • Example con 1
  • Example con 2
No User-Reviews Yet

Share your experience and build your personal ranking list.

You need to be signed in to write your own review

Tinhifi T3+ User Reviews

Example User Posted on ...
0.0

"This is an example review"

Pros
  • Example pro 1
  • Example pro 2
Cons
  • Example con 1
  • Example con 2
No User-Reviews Yet

Share your experience and build your personal ranking list.

You need to be signed in to write your own review

Find your next IEM:

IEM Finder Quiz

new
Use this quiz and answer a few questions to get your individual IEM recommendation list
(1/2) How much are you willing to spend on the IEM?
(2/2) Which sound characteristics are particularly important to you?

Footer