Tipsy Spica 260 VS FATfreq x HBB Deuce
IEM Comparison: Expert & Community Scores Side-by-Side
Tipsy Spica 260 and FATfreq x HBB Deuce use 2DD BA and 2DD driver setups respectively. Tipsy Spica 260 costs $206 while FATfreq x HBB Deuce costs $239. FATfreq x HBB Deuce is $33 more expensive. FATfreq x HBB Deuce holds a decisive 2.3-point edge in reviewer scores (4.9 vs 7.2). FATfreq x HBB Deuce has significantly better mids with a 2-point edge, FATfreq x HBB Deuce has significantly better treble with a 2.5-point edge and FATfreq x HBB Deuce has significantly better dynamics with a 1-point edge.
Insights
| Metric | Tipsy Spica 260 | FATfreq x HBB Deuce |
|---|---|---|
| Bass | 4.9 | 7 |
| Mids | 5 | 7 |
| Treble | 3 | 5.5 |
| Soundstage | 6 | 6 |
| Dynamics | 5 | 6 |
| Tonality | 4.4 | 6.6 |
| Technicalities | 4.5 | 5.8 |
Tipsy Spica 260 Aggregated Review Score
Average Reviewer Scores
FATfreq x HBB Deuce Aggregated Review Score
Average Reviewer Scores
Tipsy Spica 260 Details
Driver Configuration: 2DD BA
Tuning Type: n/a
Price (Msrp): $206
Support our free service! Buying through our affiliate links costs you nothing extra:
FATfreq x HBB Deuce Details
Driver Configuration: 2DD
Tuning Type: n/a
Price (Msrp): $239
Support our free service! Buying through our affiliate links costs you nothing extra:
Tipsy Spica 260 User Review Score
Average User Scores
Average User Score: n/a
Based on 0 user reviews
No user reviews yet. Be the first one who writes a review!
FATfreq x HBB Deuce User Review Score
Average User Scores
Average User Score: n/a
Based on 0 user reviews
No user reviews yet. Be the first one who writes a review!
Tipsy Spica 260 Gaming Score
Gaming Score & Grade
- The gaming score is prioritizing technical capabilities of the IEM (Separation, Layering, Soundstage) and good value.
Gaming Score
4.5Gaming Grade
CFATfreq x HBB Deuce Gaming Score
Gaming Score & Grade
- The gaming score is prioritizing technical capabilities of the IEM (Separation, Layering, Soundstage) and good value.
Gaming Score
6.1Gaming Grade
BTipsy Spica 260 Scorings
Average Technical & Tuning Grades
Average Tunign Grade
C-- Significantly flawed tuning. Noticeable frequency imbalances and unnatural timbre distract from music. Lacks versatility across recordings.
Average Technical Grade
C- Limited resolution; finer nuances are masked. Soundstage feels narrow, and complex passages cause muddiness. Transitions lack finesse.
FATfreq x HBB Deuce Scorings
Average Technical & Tuning Grades
Average Tunign Grade
B+- Generally enjoyable tonal character with some noticeable unevenness. Maintains listenability while showing room for refinement in frequency balance.
Average Technical Grade
B-- Satisfactory technical performance. Handles basic detail retrieval adequately in most tracks. Maintains reasonable cohesion in simpler arrangements.
Tipsy Spica 260 Reviews
Reviewed by: Jaytiss
5.3
Reviewer Score
Reviewed by: Gizaudio Axel
4.5
Reviewer Score
FATfreq x HBB Deuce Reviews
Reviewed by: Super* Review
8.5*
* score normalized
Super* Review original ranking
Super* Review Youtube Channel
Reviewed by: Audionotions
7.5
Reviewer Score
Reviewed by: Bad Guy Good Audio
7.1
Reviewer Score
Bad Guy Good Audio original ranking
Bad Guy Good Audio Youtube Channel
Reviewed by: Z-Reviews
7
* score normalized
Reviewed by: Jaytiss
6.8
Reviewer Score
Jaytiss Youtube Channel
Reviewed by: Jays Audio
6
Reviewer Score
Jays Audio Youtube Channel
Tipsy Spica 260 User Reviews
"This is an example review"
Pros
- Example pro 1
- Example pro 2
Cons
- Example con 1
- Example con 2
Share your experience and build your personal ranking list.
You need to be signed in to write your own reviewFATfreq x HBB Deuce User Reviews
"This is an example review"
Pros
- Example pro 1
- Example pro 2
Cons
- Example con 1
- Example con 2
Share your experience and build your personal ranking list.
You need to be signed in to write your own review