Tipsy Spica 260 [4.9/10]
Reviews (2), scores and comparisons for Tipsy Spica 260
IEMRanking.com
Home
Tipsy Spica 260
Average Reviewer Scores
Average Reviewer Score:
4.9Generally Unfavorable
Average User Scores
Average User Score: n/a
Based on 0 user reviews
No user reviews yet. Be the first one who writes a review!
Gaming Score & Grade
- The gaming score is prioritizing technical capabilities of the IEM (Separation, Layering, Soundstage) and good value.
Gaming Score
4.5Gaming Grade
CTipsy Spica 260 Details
Driver Configuration: 2DD BA
Tuning Type: n/a
Price (Msrp): $206
Support our free service! Buying through our affiliate links costs you nothing extra:
Reviews
Reviewed by: Jaytiss
5.3
Reviewer Score
C-
Tuning
D
Tech
Reviewed by: Gizaudio Axel
4.5
Reviewer Score
C
Tuning
B
Tech
Tools
IEM Finder Quiz
new
Use this quiz and answer a few questions to get your individual IEM recommendation list
(1/2) How much are you willing to spend on the IEM?
(2/2) Which sound characteristics are particularly important to you?
Tipsy Spica 260 Infos
Compare Tipsy Spica 260 to popular alternatives
Compare two IEMs side by side
Name
VS
Name
| IEM | alt. Score |
|---|---|
|
Tipsy Spica 260 vs. Aful Performer 5+2
Aful Performer 5+2 offers better treble, mids and dynamics.
|
7.7 |
|
Tipsy Spica 260 vs. Ziigaat Odyssey
Ziigaat Odyssey offers better treble, mids and dynamics.
|
7.6 |
|
Tipsy Spica 260 vs. Gizaudio x Binary Chopin
Gizaudio x Binary Chopin offers better treble, dynamics and mids.
|
7.6 |
|
Tipsy Spica 260 vs. CrinEar Daybreak
CrinEar Daybreak offers better treble, mids and dynamics.
|
7.3 |
|
Tipsy Spica 260 vs. DUNU x KOTO ITO
DUNU x KOTO ITO offers better treble, dynamics and soundstage.
|
7.3 |
|
Tipsy Spica 260 vs. FATfreq x HBB Deuce
FATfreq x HBB Deuce offers better treble, mids and dynamics.
|
7.2 |
|
Tipsy Spica 260 vs. EPZ P50
EPZ P50 offers better treble, mids and soundstage.
|
7 |
|
Tipsy Spica 260 vs. BQEYZ Winter
Similar overall performance.
|
7 |
|
Tipsy Spica 260 vs. Pula PA02
Pula PA02 offers better treble, mids and soundstage.
|
7 |
|
Tipsy Spica 260 vs. Kiwi Ears KE4
Kiwi Ears KE4 offers better treble, mids and soundstage.
|
6.9 |
Average Technical & Tuning Grades
Average Tunign Grade
C-- Significantly flawed tuning. Noticeable frequency imbalances and unnatural timbre distract from music. Lacks versatility across recordings.
Average Technical Grade
C- Limited resolution; finer nuances are masked. Soundstage feels narrow, and complex passages cause muddiness. Transitions lack finesse.
Mids
C+
Decent midrange performance - balanced but unremarkable. Adequate clarity for most genres without notable flaws.
Treble
D
Uneven treble response with noticeable peaks and dips. Can sound both dull and occasionally harsh simultaneously.
Dynamics
C+
Decent dynamic performance. Good macro-contrast but micro-dynamics could be more nuanced. Satisfactory impact.
Soundstage
B
Good soundstage with proper width and depth. Instruments have clear positioning with reasonable front/back placement.
Gaming
C
Minimal environmental definition provides only general audio cues. Suitable for games where positioning isn't critical.
User Reviews
Example User
Posted on ...
"This is an example review"
Pros
- Example pro 1
- Example pro 2
Cons
- Example con 1
- Example con 2
No User-Reviews Yet
Share your experience and build your personal ranking list.
You need to be signed in to write your own review