Tipsy Spica 260 - Reviews & Ratings

2 Reviews (C Tier | 4.9/10)

Home Tipsy Spica 260

Summary

Based on 2 reviews, the Tipsy Spica 260 is a situational pick according to reviewers, who suggest matching it carefully to individual tastes.

Average Reviewer Scores

Average Reviewer Score:

4.9

Generally Unfavorable

Average User Scores

Average User Score: n/a

Based on 0 user reviews

No user reviews yet. Be the first one who writes a review!

Gaming Score & Grade

  • The gaming score is prioritizing technical capabilities of the IEM (Separation, Layering, Soundstage) and good value.

Gaming Score

4.5

Gaming Grade

C

Reviews

Reviewed by: Jaytiss

Jaytiss 5.3 Reviewer Score
C- Tuning
D Tech
Great with EQ.

Jaytiss original ranking

Jaytiss Youtube Channel
Mids: C+ Treble: D Dynamics: C+ Soundstage: B

Reviewed by: Gizaudio Axel

Gizaudio Axel 4.5 Reviewer Score
C Tuning
B Tech

Tools

IEM Finder Quiz

new
Use this quiz and answer a few questions to get your individual IEM recommendation list
(1/3) How much are you willing to spend on the IEM?
(2/3) Which sound characteristics are particularly important to you?
(3/3) Which tuning do you prefer?
You can select multiple options.

Tipsy Spica 260 Infos

Discuss Tipsy Spica 260 with the community

Start an official forum discussion for this IEM. We'll create a new thread titled "Tipsy Spica 260 discussion thread" in our IEM Discussion Threads.

Compare Tipsy Spica 260 to popular alternatives

Take this comparison with a grain of salt—we don't have enough Tipsy Spica 260 reviews saved yet to provide an unbiased result.
Compare two IEMs side by side
Name

VS

Name
IEM alt. Score
Tipsy Spica 260 vs. Ziigaat Odyssey
Ziigaat Odyssey offers better treble, mids and dynamics.
7.7
Tipsy Spica 260 vs. Aful Performer 5+2
Aful Performer 5+2 offers better treble, mids and dynamics.
7.7
Tipsy Spica 260 vs. Letshuoer S12 Ultra
Letshuoer S12 Ultra offers better treble, dynamics and mids.
7.6
Tipsy Spica 260 vs. Gizaudio x Binary Chopin
Gizaudio x Binary Chopin offers better treble, dynamics and mids.
7.5
Tipsy Spica 260 vs. Simgot ET142
Similar overall performance.
7.4
Tipsy Spica 260 vs. Crinear Daybreak
Crinear Daybreak offers better treble, mids and dynamics.
7.3
Tipsy Spica 260 vs. Hidizs MP145
Hidizs MP145 offers better treble, dynamics and mids.
7.3
Tipsy Spica 260 vs. TWISTURA WoodNote
TWISTURA WoodNote offers better mids, treble and soundstage.
7.3
Tipsy Spica 260 vs. EPZ P50
EPZ P50 offers better treble, mids and soundstage.
7.2
Tipsy Spica 260 vs. FatFreq x HBB Deuce
FatFreq x HBB Deuce offers better treble, mids and dynamics.
7.2
Best IEMs from $200 - $400

Average Technical & Tuning Grades

Average Tunign Grade

C-
  • Uneven emphasis across the spectrum keeps the presentation unsettled and awkward. Acoustic instruments lose their natural body.

Average Technical Grade

C
  • The tuning renders a cramped window into the music, with nuance fading fast. Expect grainy textures to creep in.
Mids C+
The region sounds agreeable overall, delivering clarity without flashiness. Slight warmth keeps things easy-going.
Treble D
Expect treble that alternates between muted and splashy in the same track. Cymbals sound inconsistent across tracks.
Dynamics C+
Dynamics feel competent, bringing energy without the finest detail. It carries energy without sounding aggressive.
Soundstage B
A satisfying balance of width and depth yields a stage that feels organized and engaging. Imaging lines up with the intended mix.
Gaming C
Minimal environmental definition provides only general audio cues. Suitable for games where positioning isn't critical.

User Reviews

Example User Posted on ...
0.0

"This is an example review"

Pros
  • Example pro 1
  • Example pro 2
Cons
  • Example con 1
  • Example con 2
No User-Reviews Yet

Share your experience and build your personal ranking list.

Footer