UM Macbeth ii CL VS EPZ 530

IEM Comparison: Expert & Community Scores Side-by-Side

IEMRanking.com Home Compare IEMs

UM Macbeth ii CL and EPZ 530 are in-ear monitors. UM Macbeth ii CL costs $620 while EPZ 530 costs $700. EPZ 530 is $80 more expensive. EPZ 530 holds a decisive 2.9-point edge in reviewer scores (4.8 vs 7.7). EPZ 530 has significantly better mids with a 1.5-point edge, EPZ 530 has significantly better treble with a 2-point edge and EPZ 530 has significantly better soundstage with a 1-point edge.

Insights

Metric UM Macbeth ii CL EPZ 530
Bass 3 7.7
Mids 4.5 6
Treble 4 6
Details 5.5 7.7
Soundstage 6 7
Imaging 6 7.7
Dynamics 4.8 7
Gaming capabilities 4.7 6.6

UM Macbeth ii CL Aggregated Review Score

UM Macbeth ii CL Average Reviewer Scores

Shuwa-T

Average Reviewer Score:

4.8

Generally Unfavorable


EPZ 530 Aggregated Review Score

EPZ 530 Average Reviewer Scores

Jays Audio Jaytiss
Z-Reviews

Average Reviewer Score:

7.7

Strongly Favorable


UM Macbeth ii CL User Review Score

UM Macbeth ii CL Average User Scores

Average User Score: n/a

Based on 0 user reviews

No user reviews yet. Be the first one who writes a review!

EPZ 530 User Review Score

EPZ 530 Average User Scores

Average User Score: n/a

Based on 0 user reviews

No user reviews yet. Be the first one who writes a review!

UM Macbeth ii CL Gaming Score

Gaming Score & Grade

  • The gaming score is prioritizing technical capabilities of the IEM (Separation, Layering, Soundstage) and good value.

Gaming Score

4.7

Gaming Grade

C

EPZ 530 Gaming Score

Gaming Score & Grade

  • The gaming score is prioritizing technical capabilities of the IEM (Separation, Layering, Soundstage) and good value.

Gaming Score

6.6

Gaming Grade

B+

UM Macbeth ii CL Scorings

Average Technical & Tuning Grades

Average Tunign Grade

D+
  • Significantly flawed tuning. Noticeable frequency imbalances and unnatural timbre distract from music. Lacks versatility across recordings.

Average Technical Grade

B-
  • Satisfactory technical performance. Handles basic detail retrieval adequately in most tracks. Maintains reasonable cohesion in simpler arrangements.
Bass D
Bass is light and underwhelming. While some faint rumble exists, it lacks punch and authority in any meaningful way.
Mids C
Midrange is passable but unrefined. Lacks detail and smoothness, with occasional harshness in upper mids.
Treble C-
Average treble performance - present but lacking refinement. Some graininess or splashiness affects clarity.
Soundstage B
Good soundstage with proper width and depth. Instruments have clear positioning with reasonable front/back placement.
Details B-
Decent detail retrieval. Handles most textures adequately though micro-details and ambient cues could be more pronounced.
Imaging B
Good imaging with precise instrument placement. Clear localization within the soundstage including front/back positioning.
Gaming C
Minimal environmental definition provides only general audio cues. Suitable for games where positioning isn't critical. Bad value-to-cost for gaming purpose - not recommended

EPZ 530 Scorings

Average Technical & Tuning Grades

Average Tunign Grade

A-
  • Pleasing tonal balance with good technical control. Minor quirks present but not distracting. Demonstrates decent genre versatility.

Average Technical Grade

A-
  • Competent technical presentation. Handles separation and detail well in most tracks, with modest soundstage and acceptable imaging capabilities.
Mids B
Good midrange presence with solid clarity. Vocals are clear and instruments have reasonable texture and body.
Treble B
Good treble response - clear and detailed without fatigue. Well-extended with proper air and sparkle.
Dynamics A-
Excellent dynamics with great contrast and speed. Transients are crisp and micro-details are clearly articulated.
Soundstage A-
Excellent spatial presentation - wide, deep and tall. Precise instrument placement with clear separation in all dimensions.
Gaming B+
Respectable environmental presentation favors atmosphere over precision. Detects obvious directional cues while conveying game world ambiance. Bad value-to-cost for gaming purpose - not recommended

UM Macbeth ii CL Reviews

UM Macbeth ii CL reviewed by:

Shuwa-T 4.8 Reviewer Score
D+ Tuning
B- Tech
Comment: Literally an inferior Macbeth. Organic sounding vocals Everything else

Shuwa-T original ranking

Shuwa-T Website

- Shuwa-T
Bass: D Mids: C Treble: C- Soundstage: B Details: B- Imaging: B

EPZ 530 Reviews

EPZ 530 reviewed by:

Z-Reviews 8 * score normalized
Ad
Using this affiliate link for ordering your EPZ 530 or any other IEM helps fund our free service at no extra cost to you.

Price: $443

Buy EPZ 530 on Linsoul

EPZ 530 reviewed by:

Jays Audio 7.5 Reviewer Score
A+ Tuning
A+ Tech
Great set for jazz/blues/soul/acoustic. Thick and lush. Warm but with nice treble extension. Solid tech. Vocals can be overly husky and buried in busier songs.

Jays Audio original ranking

Jays Audio Youtube Channel
- Jays Audio

EPZ 530 reviewed by:

Jaytiss 7.5 Reviewer Score
B+ Tuning
B Tech
It does some things very well. Very good item.

Jaytiss original ranking

Jaytiss Youtube Channel
- Jaytiss
Mids: B Treble: B Dynamics: A- Soundstage: A-

UM Macbeth ii CL User Reviews

Example User Posted on ...
0.0

"This is an example review"

Pros
  • Example pro 1
  • Example pro 2
Cons
  • Example con 1
  • Example con 2
No User-Reviews Yet

Share your experience and build your personal ranking list.

You need to be signed in to write your own review

EPZ 530 User Reviews

Example User Posted on ...
0.0

"This is an example review"

Pros
  • Example pro 1
  • Example pro 2
Cons
  • Example con 1
  • Example con 2
No User-Reviews Yet

Share your experience and build your personal ranking list.

You need to be signed in to write your own review

Find your next IEM:

IEM Finder Quiz

new
Use this quiz and answer a few questions to get your individual IEM recommendation list
(1/2) How much are you willing to spend on the IEM?
(2/2) Which sound characteristics are particularly important to you?

Footer