UM Macbeth ii CL - Reviews & Ratings

1 Review (C Tier | 4.8/10)

Home UM Macbeth ii CL

Summary

Based on 1 review, the UM Macbeth ii CL is earning praise from some reviewers while others stay unconvinced, resulting in a balanced verdict.

Average Reviewer Scores

Shuwa-T

Average Reviewer Score:

4.8

Generally Unfavorable

Average User Scores

Average User Score: n/a

Based on 0 user reviews

No user reviews yet. Be the first one who writes a review!

Gaming Score & Grade

  • The gaming score is prioritizing technical capabilities of the IEM (Separation, Layering, Soundstage) and good value.

Gaming Score

4.7

Gaming Grade

C

Reviews

Reviewed by: Shuwa-T

Shuwa-T 4.8 Reviewer Score
D+ Tuning
B- Tech
Comment: Literally an inferior Macbeth. Organic sounding vocals Everything else

Shuwa-T original ranking

Shuwa-T Website

Bass: D Mids: C Treble: C- Soundstage: B Details: B- Imaging: B

Tools

IEM Finder Quiz

new
Use this quiz and answer a few questions to get your individual IEM recommendation list
(1/3) How much are you willing to spend on the IEM?
(2/3) Which sound characteristics are particularly important to you?
(3/3) Which tuning do you prefer?
You can select multiple options.

UM Macbeth ii CL Infos

Compare UM Macbeth ii CL to popular alternatives

Take this comparison with a grain of salt—we don't have enough UM Macbeth ii CL reviews saved yet to provide an unbiased result.
Compare two IEMs side by side
Name

VS

Name
IEM alt. Score
UM Macbeth ii CL vs. Softears RSV MK II
Softears RSV MK II offers better bass, treble and mids.
8.2
UM Macbeth ii CL vs. Nicehck Rockies
Nicehck Rockies offers better bass, treble and mids.
8
UM Macbeth ii CL vs. Hisenior Mega5-EST
Hisenior Mega5-EST offers better bass, treble and mids.
8
UM Macbeth ii CL vs. EPZ 530
EPZ 530 offers better treble, soundstage and mids.
8
UM Macbeth ii CL vs. ORIVETI OH700VB
ORIVETI OH700VB offers better treble, mids and soundstage.
7.9
UM Macbeth ii CL vs. Xenns Top Pro
Xenns Top Pro offers better bass, treble and mids.
7.9
UM Macbeth ii CL vs. Thieaudio Oracle MKIII
Thieaudio Oracle MKIII offers better bass, mids and treble.
7.8
UM Macbeth ii CL vs. Night Oblivion Butastur
Night Oblivion Butastur offers better bass, mids and treble.
7.8
UM Macbeth ii CL vs. Intuaura Purple
Similar overall performance.
7.8
UM Macbeth ii CL vs. LetShuoer EJ07M
LetShuoer EJ07M offers better bass, mids and treble.
7.6
Best IEMs from $600 - $1,000

Average Technical & Tuning Grades

Average Tunign Grade

D+
  • Tonality remains inconsistent, with uneven peaks and dips that disrupt musical flow. You'll constantly notice peaks or dips pulling focus.

Average Technical Grade

B-
  • Overall technicalities are acceptable, delivering enough clarity for casual sessions. Imaging is serviceable though not immersive.
Bass D
The bass sits quietly in the background, providing only faint support. Live recordings lose their stage thump.
Mids C
Expect adequate midrange presence with a touch of grit and unevenness. Textures smear when the mix gets busy.
Treble C-
Expect serviceable treble that keeps detail audible without much polish. It keeps the highs audible without elegance.
Soundstage B
You can map the ensemble with confidence thanks to solid spacing and coherent depth layering. Ambient effects feel believable.
Details B-
It rides the line between musicality and analysis, occasionally letting micro-detail slip by. Complex mixes stay organized for the most part.
Imaging B
Instrument boundaries feel well carved, avoiding smear or drift. Instrument outlines feel well-defined.
Gaming C
Minimal environmental definition provides only general audio cues. Suitable for games where positioning isn't critical. Bad value-to-cost for gaming purpose - not recommended

User Reviews

Example User Posted on ...
0.0

"This is an example review"

Pros
  • Example pro 1
  • Example pro 2
Cons
  • Example con 1
  • Example con 2
No User-Reviews Yet

Share your experience and build your personal ranking list.

Footer