UM Macbeth ii CL IEM Review, Price & Ranking

Expert and community scores, sound signature and specs for UM Macbeth ii CL

IEMRanking.com Home UM Macbeth ii CL

UM Macbeth ii CL Average Reviewer Scores

Shuwa-T

Average Reviewer Score:

4.8

Generally Unfavorable

UM Macbeth ii CL Average User Scores

Average User Score: n/a

Based on 0 user reviews

No user reviews yet. Be the first one who writes a review!

Gaming Score & Grade

  • The gaming score is prioritizing technical capabilities of the IEM (Separation, Layering, Soundstage) and good value.

Gaming Score

4.7

Gaming Grade

C

Reviews

UM Macbeth ii CL reviewed by:

Shuwa-T 4.8 Reviewer Score
D+ Tuning
B- Tech
Comment: Literally an inferior Macbeth. Organic sounding vocals Everything else

Shuwa-T original ranking

Shuwa-T Website

- Shuwa-T
Bass: D Mids: C Treble: C- Soundstage: B Details: B- Imaging: B

Tools

IEM Finder Quiz

new
Use this quiz and answer a few questions to get your individual IEM recommendation list
(1/2) How much are you willing to spend on the IEM?
(2/2) Which sound characteristics are particularly important to you?

UM Macbeth ii CL Infos

Sound Metrics

Average Technical & Tuning Grades

Average Tunign Grade

D+
  • Significantly flawed tuning. Noticeable frequency imbalances and unnatural timbre distract from music. Lacks versatility across recordings.

Average Technical Grade

B-
  • Satisfactory technical performance. Handles basic detail retrieval adequately in most tracks. Maintains reasonable cohesion in simpler arrangements.
Bass D
Bass is light and underwhelming. While some faint rumble exists, it lacks punch and authority in any meaningful way.
Mids C
Midrange is passable but unrefined. Lacks detail and smoothness, with occasional harshness in upper mids.
Treble C-
Average treble performance - present but lacking refinement. Some graininess or splashiness affects clarity.
Soundstage B
Good soundstage with proper width and depth. Instruments have clear positioning with reasonable front/back placement.
Details B-
Decent detail retrieval. Handles most textures adequately though micro-details and ambient cues could be more pronounced.
Imaging B
Good imaging with precise instrument placement. Clear localization within the soundstage including front/back positioning.
Gaming C
Minimal environmental definition provides only general audio cues. Suitable for games where positioning isn't critical. Bad value-to-cost for gaming purpose - not recommended

Top alternatives for UM Macbeth ii CL

IEM Comparison Tool

new
Compare two IEMs side by side
Name

VS

Name

User Reviews

Example User Posted on ...
0.0

"This is an example review"

Pros
  • Example pro 1
  • Example pro 2
Cons
  • Example con 1
  • Example con 2
No User-Reviews Yet

Share your experience and build your personal ranking list.

Footer