Xenns Tea Pro VS Ziigaat Arcanis

Build & presentation scream premium: a matte metal alloy shell with lush green-blue fade and gold script, plus a black-silver sparkle faceplate that looks like wearable art. Ergonomics are excellent despite a slightly wider nozzle and a bit of heft, allowing long sessions without discomfort. The package impresses with a gallery-style unboxing, matching carrying case, and a silver cable with interchangeable 3.5/4.4 terminations. Under the hood: 2 dynamic drivers + 6 BAs at ~$360.

Tonally it’s a balanced, warmer-leaning set with elevated sub-bass depth, clean attack/decay, and more treble extension and sparkle than comparable sets. The stage sits a touch more intimate, but separation and layering are immaculate, and imaging locks in with precision. Mids don’t pop as forward as some peers, yet overall resolution stays high with “oodles of detail,” giving music a rich, cohesive presentation that still feels highly detailed.

For competitive play the performance is A-tier: in Apex, Valorant, and especially Call of Duty, imaging and depth perception are master-class. Gunfire comes through cleaner with less reverb; airstrikes and mortar noise get pushed back so crucial cues like footsteps, slides, and shield pops cut through. The more intimate stage aids crosshair placement and micro-positioning, while separation stays clear even in chaotic fights. Verdict: a high A- on the Wall-Hack Certified list—an excellent pick for gamers wanting warmth, sub-bass authority, and elite imaging without sacrificing musical enjoyment.

The Xenns Tea Pro stands as the most refined and well-rounded iteration of the Tea series to date, offering strong competition in the $300 IEM market. While it loses some of the unique "sauce" found in earlier models, it delivers significant improvements, particularly sounding like a "better Da Vinci" with its bass presentation. The Pro features a similar heaviness and thickness to the notes but adds more upper mids, treble extension, and overall better resolution. For roughly $60 more than the Da Vinci, the Pro offers upgraded drivers from Knowles, contributing to better timbre, a bump in technical performance, and equally good accessories.

Compared to the original Tea and Tea 2, the Pro emerges as the better all-rounder but lacks their distinct character. The original Tea remains superior for its highly addicting vocals, bite, and holographic staging, while the Pro offers more balanced, fuller, smoother, and more versatile vocals alongside superior bass in slam, texture, impact, resolution, and rumble due to its new dual dynamic drivers. Treble extension, overall resolution, and a more open stage also see noticeable improvements over both predecessors. Technical performance-wise, the Pro is highly competitive with other $200+ IEMs, offering better resolution, imaging, transience, attack, and separation than the Da Vinci, along with a more natural sound.

Positioned under $400, the Tea Pro fits as a balanced choice between neutral and exciting tunings. Against the clean, neutral Pilgrim or Dusk, the Pro provides a bassier, heavier, fuller sound with more forward vocals and better note weight. Compared to the exciting Estrella, the Pro is more balanced, thicker, and slams harder, while the Estrella offers more dynamic contrast and crispier treble. Versus the similarly priced Hype 4, the Pro delivers harder slam, deeper bass, and sharper vocals with more bite, though the Hype 4 is slightly quicker, smoother, and more balanced. Essentially, the Tea Pro excels as a versatile, resolving set with satisfying bass and well-tuned vocals, making it the best pick for most listeners despite losing some quirks of earlier models.

The Xenns Tea Pro impresses most with its exceptional build quality and aesthetics. The metallic shell feels substantial and premium in the ear, featuring a comfortable wing design and a nice metal nozzle. While slightly larger than its predecessors like the Tea and Tea2, the Pro's shell represents an upgrade in feel and technology, boasting a prettier faceplate. The included cable is thick, braided, and features a swappable termination (4.4mm or 3.5mm), contributing to an overall solid package that feels like a significant step up from previous models.

Sonically, the Tea Pro offers a bassy but clean signature with strong, impactful low end. However, it presents some key drawbacks: the bass can feel slightly boomy or distorted rather than pristine, and the overall presentation leans dark and rich. This comes at the expense of upper treble sparkle, air, and micro-details, resulting in a narrow soundstage and less impressive instrument separation than expected at its price point. While extremely pleasant and engaging for music listening, it feels slightly muffled and lacks the clarity and detail retrieval of many competitors.

When stacked against rivals like the Dunu Da Vinci, Kiwi Ears Quintet, EM10, DUNU DaVinci, Hype 4, or CCA CA4, the Tea Pro often falls short sonically. Competitors generally offer better air, treble extension, cleaner bass, or superior detail. Its own predecessor, the Tea2, is considered more neutral and relaxed. Consequently, while the Tea Pro is a contender with its fantastic build and fun tuning, it might be skippable for those prioritizing pure sound quality. It earns a recommendation for newcomers or those valuing premium construction, but audiophiles seeking the best sound may find better options elsewhere.

Xenns Tea Pro lands as an easy pick around $300 thanks to a natural, versatile tuning that blends tasteful fun with everyday usability. A gentle bass boost adds heft, slam, and definition without muddying the mids, while a touch of upper-mid lift keeps vocals clear—even on bass-heavy tracks—without tipping into thin or clinical territory. Treble stays smooth regardless of shallow or deep fit, supporting lifelike timbre and realistic decay that favors long, fatigue-free listening. Detail comes across as “natural detail” rather than etched; micro-nuances don’t jump out, but nothing feels missing or dulled either.

Against the Top Pro, bass through mids on the Top Pro can sound a bit tighter and more transparent, but its treble risks feeling overcooked and a touch “BA-like,” trading naturalness for extra sparkle and perceived detail. Tea Pro keeps the highs non-fatiguing and tonally convincing, making it the safer everyday choice. The “dream combo” would marry Top Pro’s bass-to-upper-mids with Tea Pro’s treble, but as it stands, Tea Pro remains a well-balanced, easy recommendation for its class—natural yet fun, clean vocals, and a bonus metal shell that seals the deal for all-day use.

The Ziigaat Arcanis, priced at $400 as the brand's most expensive standalone IEM, presents a mixed bag outside of its core sound. Build quality is decent but unremarkable, featuring comfortable shells with a well-fitting nozzle, though the aesthetic is described as slightly "weird." The included cable feels distinctly mid-tier and underwhelming for the price, while the case shows noticeable fraying almost immediately, contributing to an absolutely horrific unboxing experience deemed unacceptable at this cost.

Sonically, the Arcanis is a deeply divisive set with an extremely dark tilt and a significant dip around 6kHz. Initial impressions can be harsh or disappointing, but extended listening reveals its strengths: pure, clean sound free of sibilance or harshness, quality bass, clean highs, and beautiful vocals. This unique tuning philosophy creates a smooth, sophisticated, and non-fatiguing presentation. While the $230 Odyssey is praised as a fantastic value and the second-best in Ziigaat's lineup, the Arcanis is considered sonically superior, offering a more refined experience – albeit only marginally better for some. It competes favorably against sets like the Mega5EST and Dunu DaVinci, and surprisingly challenges far pricier offerings like the $1,800 Apostle in tonal beauty, though the Apostle has more "show." The $320 Volume S is a close competitor with a different, brighter tonality, making the Arcanis's value proposition relative.

Ultimately, the Arcanis shines as a beautifully dark, serious, and smooth IEM that excels at high volumes without becoming offensive. It delivers great detail without fatigue, standing out in a market saturated with energetic tunings. Despite the subpar accessories and unboxing befitting a much cheaper product, its unique and effective sound signature makes it a highly recommended pick under $400 for those seeking a refined, non-sibilant listen, though the Odyssey remains the smarter choice for budget-conscious buyers.

The Ziigaat Arcanis positions itself as a potential new vocal benchmark under $500, offering a clean yet full sound signature. A slight boost from 6 to 15kHz makes the upper mids and early treble pop out, adding extra dynamics without becoming sharp or fatiguing. Essentially, the Arcanis is a smoother, more resolving, and more spacious evolution of the original Mangird TEs, retaining their essence but with greater refinement. Vocals, the main attraction, are exceptionally clear, natural, resolving, and open, featuring the "special sauce" – a distinct bite to consonants that enhances dynamics and emotional impact. This is achieved through a careful balance: a cut at 3-6k reduces sharpness and fatigue, while a gradual rise from 800Hz to 2kHz pushes vocals slightly forward for clarity, and the 6-15k boost provides essential extension and openness.

Technical performance is impressive, with a notably open stage, pinpoint imaging, and excellent micro-details, making it great for gaming, OSTs, and classical. The bass is quick, well-textured, resolving, and controlled, offering good slam without bleeding. However, it lacks the deep sub-bass extension for genres like hip-hop or EDM, where sets like the Estrella or Dusk outperform. Scaling is crucial: busy pop or EDM tracks sound best at mid-volumes (around 60-65 dB) to prevent the treble bite from becoming overwhelming, while slower ballads and acoustics truly shine and open up at higher volumes (around 80 dB+), revealing micro-nuances and emotional depth.

Comparisons highlight the Arcanis's strengths. It's more technical and spacious than the Volume S (warmer, better for male vocals) and Studio 4 (fuller, more neutral), offering superior treble air and detail. It outpaces the RS5 in technicalities and value, though the RS5 has fuller male vocals. Against the Oracle MK1, the Arcanis boasts better treble extension, micro-details, dynamics, and that crucial vocal bite. While bright-neutral sets like the Dusk or Meta have more bass and treble emphasis, the Arcanis feels more natural and musical, especially in vocals and bass texture. Compared to Ziigaat's own Odyssey, the Arcanis is cleaner, more technical, more vocal-focused, and airier, while the Odyssey is bassier, darker, and scales better for hip-hop/rock. Despite its strengths, the accessories and cable feel unacceptably basic for the $400 price point. Ultimately, the Arcanis is highly recommended for higher-volume listening on vocal-focused tracks, but other options might be better all-rounders for mid-volume pop or bass-heavy genres.

The Ziigaat Arcanis, priced at $379, immediately raises eyebrows with its cheap packaging and accessories. The included 3.5mm cable is deemed insufficient, especially for the low 12-ohm impedance, and the IEM shells themselves have an unfortunate mold-like appearance. The basic case and lack of balanced cable option feel mismatched for the price tag. Simply put, the unboxing experience and stock accessories scream budget, not near $400.

Getting great sound out of the Arcanis requires significant aftermarket investment. The stock cable must be swapped for a high-quality, low-impedance cable (like Effect Audio) and the stock tips replaced with Velvet tips to fix staging compression and treble issues. Pairing with a powerful, capable amplifier is also essential. Once these costly upgrades are made, the 2DD + 5BA configuration truly shines, delivering excellent clarity, a unique "gooey" texture, and surprisingly good detail retrieval. However, the soundstage is notably intimate, with everything happening "behind the eyeballs", lacking the width found in competitors.

Ultimately, the Arcanis offers genuinely excellent sound quality that justifies a $400 tag – but only after spending significantly more on cables, tips, and amplification. The stock experience feels like a $300 product hampered by the included accessories and questionable shell design. It's a frustratingly high-maintenance IEM; you absolutely can achieve top-tier performance, but the effort and extra cost required make the overall value proposition hard to swallow at full price.

The Ziigaat Arcanis and Lush IEMs offer distinct flavors at their price points, both featuring resin builds with eye-catching faceplates—sparkly green for the Arcanis and silver-black for the Lush. Fit is familiar to other Ziigaat models, and accessories include a basic cable, ear tips, and carrying pouch. Sonically, the Arcanis delivers a holographic, punchy presentation with emphasized sub-bass and upper mids, making footsteps, slides, and distant gunfire pop with urgency. The Lush leans darker and smoother, relaxing upper mids to tame gunfire harshness while maintaining clean bass and excellent separation.

For gaming, performance varies by title. In Valorant and CS2, the Lush shines with precise imaging and a smoother, fatigue-free experience—gunfire feels controlled without sacrificing detail. The Arcanis excels in COD, where its aggressive tuning highlights critical cues like footsteps and slides with greater potency. However, in Apex Legends, the Lush’s relaxed profile struggles with subtle audio cues (e.g., light taps or shield cells), earning a B rating. The Arcanis fares better (B+) with superior depth reads and emphasis on environmental sounds, though complex fights can overwhelm its separation compared to top-tier sets like the Mangird Tea Pro.

Ultimately, the Arcanis is a versatile all-rounder, slightly favored for both music and most gaming scenarios. The Lush carves a niche for smooth, non-fatiguing sessions in Valorant/CS2, filling a unique spot in Ziigaat’s lineup. Both IEMs offer exceptional resolution and layering for their prices, but the choice hinges on preference: the Arcanis for its energetic clarity, or the Lush for its refined, relaxed signature.

The Ziigaat Arcanis offers a warm, somewhat thick sound signature with a noticeable bass boost and a lean lower midrange. This is balanced by a relaxed upper midrange and lower treble, contributing to its overall smooth character. While it provides decent extension, the Arcanis can occasionally present vocals with a slightly wet or near-sibilant edge, especially depending on ear tip choice and fit depth. Its transient response is sharper than the Yanyin Canon Pro, giving it better definition and crisper imaging, though the bass physicality is only middling.

Physically, the Arcanis features lightweight plastic shells with a distinctive dark black and green aesthetic. However, the build quality feels somewhat cheap for the $400 price point, especially paired with the included thin, glossy cable. The shells are notably long, leading to a fit that can feel deep and occasionally aggressive in the ear canal, exacerbated by the stock ear tips. Users may experience noticeable driver flex or squish when inserting them. Comfort is generally acceptable for upright listening but becomes problematic when lying on your side.

Ultimately, the Arcanis earns a three-star rating. While it delivers a generally inoffensive, warm sound with decent technicalities like transient bite and imaging, it lacks standout qualities or strong definition at its price. The physical experience, particularly the fit and perceived build quality, further holds it back from being a compelling recommendation. It ends up feeling like a competent but unremarkable offering in its tier.