7Hz Zero [4.7/10]

Reviews (2), scores and comparisons for 7Hz Zero

IEMRanking.com Home 7Hz Zero

Average Reviewer Scores

Precogvision
Tim Tuned

Average Reviewer Score:

4.7

Generally Unfavorable

Average User Scores

Average User Score:

Based on 1 user reviews

7

Generally Favorable

Gaming Score & Grade

  • The gaming score is prioritizing technical capabilities of the IEM (Separation, Layering, Soundstage) and good value.

Gaming Score

5.2

Gaming Grade

C+

Reviews

Tim Tuned 5 Reviewer Score
C+ Tuning
B Tech
Pros: Can't believe this is $20..... Cons: Details is only okay.

Tim Tuned original ranking

Tim Tuned Youtube Channel
- Tim Tuned
Bass: A- Mids: A+ Treble: B
Precogvision 4.4 Reviewer Score
C Tuning
C Tech
Pleasant tonal balance with some minor treble oddity.

Precogvision original ranking

Precogvision Youtube Channel
- Precogvision
Bass: C- Mids: B Treble: C- Dynamics: C- Details: C+ Imaging: C+

Tools

IEM Finder Quiz

new
Use this quiz and answer a few questions to get your individual IEM recommendation list
(1/2) How much are you willing to spend on the IEM?
(2/2) Which sound characteristics are particularly important to you?

7Hz Zero Infos

Compare 7Hz Zero to popular alternatives

Compare two IEMs side by side
Name

VS

Name
IEM alt. Score
7Hz Zero vs. Moondrop Chu II
Similar overall performance.
5.5
7Hz Zero vs. Kiwi Ears Dolce
Similar overall performance.
5.3
7Hz Zero vs. ND Planet
ND Planet offers better dynamics.
5.2
7Hz Zero vs. Venture Electronics Bonus In-Ears "BIE"
Venture Electronics Bonus In-Ears "BIE" offers better bass.
5.1
7Hz Zero vs. Tangzu Wan Er
Tangzu Wan Er offers better bass, treble and imaging.
5
7Hz Zero vs. 7Hz Salnotes Zero
Similar overall performance.
5
7Hz Zero vs. Moondrop Chu
Similar overall performance.
4.9
7Hz Zero vs. Moondrop Spaceship
Similar overall performance.
4.8
7Hz Zero vs. SIMGOT EW100P
Similar overall performance.
4.7
7Hz Zero vs. TRN IM1
Similar overall performance.
4.7
Best IEMs from below $50

Average Technical & Tuning Grades

Average Tunign Grade

C
  • Significantly flawed tuning. Noticeable frequency imbalances and unnatural timbre distract from music. Lacks versatility across recordings.

Average Technical Grade

C+
  • Satisfactory technical performance. Handles basic detail retrieval adequately in most tracks. Maintains reasonable cohesion in simpler arrangements.
Bass B-
Average bass performance - present but unremarkable. Has reasonable texture but lacks depth and physicality.
Mids A-
Excellent midrange with natural timbre and great detail retrieval. Vocals are forward and emotive with lifelike instrument reproduction.
Treble C+
Decent treble with acceptable extension and detail. Can sound slightly unrefined but avoids being harsh or sibilant.
Dynamics C-
Average dynamics - passable but unexciting. Transients are rounded and micro-dynamics lack refinement.
Details C+
Decent detail retrieval. Handles most textures adequately though micro-details and ambient cues could be more pronounced.
Imaging C+
Decent positional accuracy. Good left/right placement with acceptable center image, though depth positioning is approximate.
Gaming C+
Fundamental left/right positioning with limited depth perception. Works for non-competitive gaming but lacks precision.

User Reviews

Share your experience and build your personal ranking list.

7

Neutral bright tone.

Pros
Neutral bright tone and technically amazing.
Cons
Soft bass, Something noisy, bad cable, bad tips.

Footer