Moondrop Chu - Reviews & Ratings

8 Reviews (C Tier | 5/10)

Home Moondrop Chu

Summary

Based on 8 reviews, the Moondrop Chu is a sensible option among reviewers, especially for listeners seeking balance without drama.

Average Reviewer Scores

Average Reviewer Score:

5

Mixed to Negative

Average User Scores

Average User Score: n/a

Based on 0 user reviews

No user reviews yet. Be the first one who writes a review!

Gaming Score & Grade

  • The gaming score is prioritizing technical capabilities of the IEM (Separation, Layering, Soundstage) and good value.

Gaming Score

4.9

Gaming Grade

C

Reviews

Reviewed by: Super* Review

Super* Review 6* * score rescaled + normalized

Reviewed by: Crin

Crin 6 Reviewer Score
A+ Tuning
C+ Tech
An extremely well-tuned neutral IEM with a slightly bright and metallic tilt.

Crin original ranking

Crin Youtube Channel

Reviewed by: Tim Tuned

Tim Tuned 5 Reviewer Score
C+ Tuning
B Tech
Very well tuned and natural Treble uneveness

Tim Tuned original ranking

Tim Tuned Youtube Channel
Bass: A- Mids: A+ Treble: A-

Reviewed by: Shuwa-T

Shuwa-T 5 Reviewer Score
C Tuning
C+ Tech
Comment: Moondrop's best budget IEM. Neutral bright tuning, decent clarity at this price Technical performance in the absolute sense without price considered, gritty treble

Shuwa-T original ranking

Shuwa-T Website

Bass: C Mids: C+ Treble: C+ Soundstage: C+ Details: B- Imaging: C+

Reviewed by: Kois Archive

Kois Archive 4.4 Reviewer Score
C+ Tuning
B Tech
Rating: D | Comfort: 6 intro to moondrop sound sharp timbre

Kois Archive original ranking

Kois Archive Youtube Channel

Reviewed by: Precogvision

Precogvision 4 Reviewer Score
C- Tuning
C- Tech
A bit uninspired at this point, but no less a solid listen.

Precogvision original ranking

Precogvision Youtube Channel
Bass: D Mids: C+ Treble: C- Dynamics: D Details: C- Imaging: C+

Reviewed by: Nymz

Nymz 3.3 Reviewer Score
D+ Tuning
D Tech
Beaten by Salnotes Zero for my library. Good tuning, medriocre techs, but throwing punches up to 100$. Hard to fault. Cable is bad but workable.

Nymz original ranking

Nymz Website

Bass: D Mids: C- Treble: C- Details: D Imaging: D

Reviewed by: Head-Fi.org

Head-Fi.org 6.5 * score rescaled + normalized
18 community members have rated the Moondrop Chu at an average of 4.1/5 on Head-Fi. Overall sentiment: Very Positive.

URL to full Review

Head-Fi.org original ranking

Tools

IEM Finder Quiz

new
Use this quiz and answer a few questions to get your individual IEM recommendation list
(1/3) How much are you willing to spend on the IEM?
(2/3) Which sound characteristics are particularly important to you?
(3/3) Which tuning do you prefer?
You can select multiple options.

Moondrop Chu Infos

Discuss Moondrop Chu with the community

Start an official forum discussion for this IEM. We'll create a new thread titled "Moondrop Chu discussion thread" in our IEM Discussion Threads.

Compare Moondrop Chu to popular alternatives

Compare two IEMs side by side
Name

VS

Name
IEM alt. Score
Moondrop Chu vs. KZ Saga Balanced
Similar overall performance.
6.4
Moondrop Chu vs. NiceHCK DB2
NiceHCK DB2 offers better dynamics and soundstage.
5.9
Moondrop Chu vs. Moondrop Chu II
Similar overall performance.
5.8
Moondrop Chu vs. Kiwi Ears Dolce
Kiwi Ears Dolce offers better dynamics.
5.6
Moondrop Chu vs. Tanchjim Zero Ultima
Tanchjim Zero Ultima offers better dynamics, imaging and details.
5.6
Moondrop Chu vs. QKZ HBB
Similar overall performance.
5.5
Moondrop Chu vs. TangZu Wan'er S.G
TangZu Wan'er S.G offers better bass, soundstage and mids.
5.3
Moondrop Chu vs. KZ EDX Ultra
KZ EDX Ultra offers better dynamics, details and bass.
5.3
Moondrop Chu vs. Tanchjim Tanya DSP
Tanchjim Tanya DSP offers better bass, mids and treble.
5.2
Moondrop Chu vs. ND Planet
ND Planet offers better dynamics and mids.
5.2
Best IEMs from below $50

Average Technical & Tuning Grades

Average Tunign Grade

C+
  • Tonality is generally agreeable, though a few bumps remind you of its limits. Certain tracks spotlight its tonal quirks.

Average Technical Grade

C
  • The tuning renders a cramped window into the music, with nuance fading fast. Expect grainy textures to creep in.
Bass C-
The bass remains polite, offering definition without much drive. Dynamics remain gentle even at higher volume.
Mids B-
It presents a stable midrange foundation suitable for everyday listening. Clarity is serviceable without standing out.
Treble C+
Treble feels agreeable overall, bringing sparkle without significant fatigue. You get a polite sense of air.
Dynamics D
Volume shifts feel constrained, so build-ups plateau before releasing. Build-ups plateau before resolving.
Soundstage C+
Decent spatial presentation with noticeable width and a modest step forward in depth perception. There's a mild sense of width to enjoy.
Details C-
You get the outline of textures, though the finer brushstrokes remain faint. Background information is audible but soft.
Imaging C-
Center information lands in the right area but not with laser focus. Separation is adequate for casual listening.
Gaming C
Minimal environmental definition provides only general audio cues. Suitable for games where positioning isn't critical.

User Reviews

Example User Posted on ...
0.0

"This is an example review"

Pros
  • Example pro 1
  • Example pro 2
Cons
  • Example con 1
  • Example con 2
No User-Reviews Yet

Share your experience and build your personal ranking list.

Footer