Tanchjim Zero Ultima - Reviews & Ratings

4 Reviews (B Tier | 5.8/10)

Home Tanchjim Zero Ultima

Summary

Based on 4 reviews, the Tanchjim Zero Ultima is receiving steady, if unspectacular, approval from reviewers, highlighting its dependable nature.

Average Reviewer Scores

Average Reviewer Score:

5.8

Mixed

Average User Scores

Average User Score: n/a

Based on 0 user reviews

No user reviews yet. Be the first one who writes a review!

Gaming Score & Grade

  • The gaming score is prioritizing technical capabilities of the IEM (Separation, Layering, Soundstage) and good value.

Gaming Score

5.6

Gaming Grade

B-

Reviews

Reviewed by: Paul Wasabii

Paul Wasabii 6.5 * Score computed by IEMRanking.com
B- Tuning
B+ Tech
Zero Ultima closely mirrors Origin with a neutral-bright tilt; out of the box it can sound thin from elevated presence and treble with a touch of sub-bass roll-off. A small EQ cut in 2–5 kHz and upper treble plus a gentle sub-bass lift yields a more natural balance. Comfortable bullet fit with mic and pouch; solid driver that responds well to simple EQ. Stock tuning is neutral-bright with elevated 2–5 kHz and upper treble and audibly rolled sub-bass.
Youtube Video Summary

Tanchjim Zero Ultima follows Origin almost one-to-one, right down to the single dynamic driver and the easy bullet-style fit with inline mic and fixed cable. The tonal balance skews neutral-bright: sub-bass is modest, the 2–5 kHz region sits a bit high, and upper treble adds extra sheen, which can make notes feel lighter in weight and vocals a touch lean.

The upside is a competent driver that takes EQ gracefully. Pulling the 2–5 kHz down a few dB (below a Harman-like target), trimming the upper treble ~1–2 dB, and adding a small sub-bass lift steers the presentation toward the more natural, Oxygen-style balance with fuller vocal body and cleaner timbre. Stock tuning is a bit bright, but with that simple tweak Zero Ultima becomes a very pleasant, well-behaved daily set.

Bass: B- Mids: B Treble: B-

Paul Wasabii original ranking

Paul Wasabii Youtube Channel

Reviewed by: Z-Reviews

Z-Reviews 5 * score rescaled + normalized
Youtube Video Summary

Tanchjim Zero Ultima comes in dirt-cheap and unapologetically simple: an attached 3.5 mm cable with inline mic, featherweight shells (~2.3 g), and hilariously oversized nozzles for such tiny housings. Build cues scream budget—y-split quirks and all—but the box stuffs in a plush pouch, a stack of tips, and a manual with more pages than dollars. Under the hood sits a 10 mm double-chamber DD (DMT4), and it can want a bit of juice, yet nothing a normal source can’t handle.

Sonically, this is shock therapy for the price bracket: huge, cinematic soundstage that projects like a mini “screen” in front, with a surprisingly balanced tuning—not a bass cannon, not a treble sabre. Kick drums land with a clean thump, strings float way out without turning sharp, and the overall presentation stays cohesive instead of “fake-detail” crispy. It’s the kind of set that makes $20–$25 feel like a typo, happily chewing through AC/DC, Barry White, Pink Floyd, and Deadmau5 without crying mercy.

Value play is off the charts: call it a $40 performer sold for pocket change, perfect as a daily beater or keychain set. If a detachable cable is a must, the Bunny sibling stands by, but Zero Ultima’s stage and easygoing balance are the party trick here. Bottom line: audiophile nonsense in the best way—ridiculous width, no harshness tax, and an infectious fun factor that embarrasses pricier toys.


Z-Reviews original ranking

Z-Reviews Youtube Channel

Reviewed by: Head-Fi.org

Head-Fi.org 6.6 * score rescaled + normalized
15 community members have rated the TANCHJIM Zero Ultima at an average of 4.2/5 on Head-Fi. Overall sentiment: Very Positive.

URL to full Review

Head-Fi.org original ranking

Web Search

uses AI-Search to turn user, reddit and head-fi reviews into clear, concise summaries.
Web Search 5.1 Reviewer Score
B- Tuning
C- Tech

The Tanchjim Zero Ultima uses a single dynamic driver with a dual-chamber design (DMT 4 Ultra), rated at 30 Ω, 123 dB/Vrms sensitivity and a 10–48 kHz claimed response; build is very light and the cable includes an inline mic on the 3.5 mm version. These specifications point to easy drivability from phones and dongles, though the relatively high sensitivity can expose source noise. Pricing sits firmly in the budget tier (about €19.90 in the EU), which sets expectations for technical performance.

Tonally, Zero Ultima trends warm-neutral / neutral-with-bass-lift: a modest mid-bass rise for body, forward yet controlled upper-mids for clarity, and generally smooth treble that avoids harsh peaks. This aligns with reports describing an easy, “safe” balance that works across genres without obvious problem areas, though it’s not the most airy set.

Technicalities are respectable for the price: detail retrieval is decent and imaging is tidy, but soundstage is on the intimate side and macrodynamic slam is limited compared with higher-end single-DD sets. Ergonomics are generally friendly, though the relatively large nozzle (≈6.4–6.5 mm) may challenge smaller ears; tip choice matters for both fit and bass seal. Overall, Zero Ultima offers a competent, neutral-leaning tuning with honest—but not class-leading—technical performance at a very low cost.


Bass: C Mids: C+ Treble: C+ Dynamics: C+ Soundstage: C Details: C Imaging: C+

Tanchjim Zero Ultima Infos

Discuss Tanchjim Zero Ultima with the community

Start an official forum discussion for this IEM. We'll create a new thread titled "Tanchjim Zero Ultima discussion thread" in our IEM Discussion Threads.

Compare Tanchjim Zero Ultima to popular alternatives

Take this comparison with a grain of salt—we don't have enough Tanchjim Zero Ultima reviews saved yet to provide an unbiased result.
Compare two IEMs side by side
Name

VS

Name
IEM alt. Score
Tanchjim Zero Ultima vs. KZ Saga Balanced
Similar overall performance.
6.4
Tanchjim Zero Ultima vs. KZ Duonic
KZ Duonic offers better details, bass and soundstage.
6.4
Tanchjim Zero Ultima vs. NiceHCK DB2
NiceHCK DB2 offers better soundstage.
5.9
Tanchjim Zero Ultima vs. Nicehck StringSnow
Nicehck StringSnow offers better details, treble and mids.
5.9
Tanchjim Zero Ultima vs. Moondrop Chu II
Similar overall performance.
5.8
Tanchjim Zero Ultima vs. ND Planet
ND Planet offers better details, bass and imaging.
5.7
Tanchjim Zero Ultima vs. Kiwi Ears Dolce
Kiwi Ears Dolce offers better soundstage.
5.6
Tanchjim Zero Ultima vs. CCA Polaris
CCA Polaris offers better soundstage and mids.
5.6
Tanchjim Zero Ultima vs. Moondrop Quarks DSP
Moondrop Quarks DSP offers better treble, mids and bass.
5.6
Tanchjim Zero Ultima vs. QKZ HBB
Similar overall performance.
5.5
Best IEMs from below $50

IEM Finder Quiz

new
Use this quiz and answer a few questions to get your individual IEM recommendation list
(1/3) How much are you willing to spend on the IEM?
(2/3) Which sound characteristics are particularly important to you?
(3/3) Which tuning do you prefer?
You can select multiple options.

Average Technical & Tuning Grades

Average Tunign Grade

B-
  • The tuning leans easygoing, yet occasional unevenness nudges it away from greatness. A bit of EQ polish can smooth things nicely.

Average Technical Grade

B-
  • Overall technicalities are acceptable, delivering enough clarity for casual sessions. Imaging is serviceable though not immersive.
Bass C+
Expect a balanced but ordinary low end that avoids both extremes. Slam remains moderate and controlled.
Mids B-
The region sounds agreeable overall, delivering clarity without flashiness. Slight warmth keeps things easy-going.
Treble B-
Treble feels agreeable overall, bringing sparkle without significant fatigue. You get a polite sense of air.
Dynamics C+
You get reliable macrodynamics, with micro shifts that remain only adequate. A reliable performer for most tracks.
Soundstage C
Stereo spread is acceptable, yet the image resembles a stage set without depth behind the curtain. Depth feels more like a gentle slope.
Details C
It conveys the core of each track yet glosses over the quieter gestures underneath. Delicate details remain a bit subdued.
Imaging C+
A stable phantom center appears, lending vocals a consistent anchor. It maintains a coherent phantom center.
Gaming B-
Moderate spatial presentation conveys general directionality. Suitable for casual play where precision isn't critical.

User Reviews

Example User Posted on ...
0.0

"This is an example review"

Pros
  • Example pro 1
  • Example pro 2
Cons
  • Example con 1
  • Example con 2
No User-Reviews Yet

Share your experience and build your personal ranking list.

Footer