QKZ HBB - Reviews & Ratings

2 Reviews (C Tier | 4/10)

IEMRanking.com Home QKZ HBB

Average Reviewer Scores

Jays Audio
Fresh Reviews

Average Reviewer Score:

4

Unfavorable

Average User Scores

Average User Score: n/a

Based on 0 user reviews

No user reviews yet. Be the first one who writes a review!

Gaming Score & Grade

  • The gaming score is prioritizing technical capabilities of the IEM (Separation, Layering, Soundstage) and good value.

Gaming Score

5.5

Gaming Grade

B-

Reviews

Reviewed by: Fresh Reviews

Fresh Reviews 5.5* * The score of this reviewer influences only the Gaming Score

Reviewed by: Jays Audio

Jays Audio 4 Reviewer Score
B+ Tuning
C+ Tech
Very well tuned warm/bassy set. Not basshead like the Rosefinch, but still has good bass impact as well as upholding enough treble extension.

Jays Audio original ranking

Jays Audio Youtube Channel

Tools

IEM Finder Quiz

new
Use this quiz and answer a few questions to get your individual IEM recommendation list
(1/2) How much are you willing to spend on the IEM?
(2/2) Which sound characteristics are particularly important to you?

QKZ HBB Infos

Compare QKZ HBB to popular alternatives

Compare two IEMs side by side
Name

VS

Name
IEM alt. Score
QKZ HBB vs. Moondrop Chu II
Similar overall performance.
5.5
QKZ HBB vs. Kiwi Ears Dolce
Similar overall performance.
5.3
QKZ HBB vs. ND Planet
Similar overall performance.
5.2
QKZ HBB vs. Venture Electronics Bonus In-Ears "BIE"
Similar overall performance.
5.1
QKZ HBB vs. Tangzu Wan Er
Similar overall performance.
5
QKZ HBB vs. 7Hz Salnotes Zero
Similar overall performance.
5
QKZ HBB vs. Moondrop Chu
Similar overall performance.
4.9
QKZ HBB vs. Moondrop Spaceship
Similar overall performance.
4.8
QKZ HBB vs. 7Hz Zero
Similar overall performance.
4.7
QKZ HBB vs. SIMGOT EW100P
Similar overall performance.
4.7
Best IEMs from below $50

Average Technical & Tuning Grades

Average Tunign Grade

B+
  • Generally enjoyable tonal character with some noticeable unevenness. Maintains listenability while showing room for refinement in frequency balance.

Average Technical Grade

C+
  • Satisfactory technical performance. Handles basic detail retrieval adequately in most tracks. Maintains reasonable cohesion in simpler arrangements.
Gaming B-
Moderate spatial presentation conveys general directionality. Suitable for casual play where precision isn't critical.

User Reviews

Example User Posted on ...
0.0

"This is an example review"

Pros
  • Example pro 1
  • Example pro 2
Cons
  • Example con 1
  • Example con 2
No User-Reviews Yet

Share your experience and build your personal ranking list.

Footer