KZ EDX Ultra - Reviews & Ratings
1 Review (D Tier | 3.8/10)
IEMRanking.com
Home
KZ EDX Ultra
Average Reviewer Scores
Average Reviewer Score:
3.8Poor
Average User Scores
Average User Score: n/a
Based on 0 user reviews
No user reviews yet. Be the first one who writes a review!
Gaming Score & Grade
- The gaming score is prioritizing technical capabilities of the IEM (Separation, Layering, Soundstage) and good value.
Gaming Score
4.3Gaming Grade
C-KZ EDX Ultra Details
Driver Configuration: 2DD
Tuning Type: n/a
Brand: KZ Top KZ IEMs
Price (Msrp): $22
Support our free service! Buying through our affiliate links costs you nothing extra:
Reviews
Reviewed by: Precogvision
3.8
Reviewer Score
C-
Tuning
C-
Tech
Far too bright in the upper-treble, but reasonably decent otherwise.
Precogvision Youtube Channel
Precogvision Youtube Channel
Bass: C+
Mids: C+
Treble: D
Dynamics: C-
Details: C+
Imaging: C-
Tools
IEM Finder Quiz
new
Use this quiz and answer a few questions to get your individual IEM recommendation list
(1/2) How much are you willing to spend on the IEM?
(2/2) Which sound characteristics are particularly important to you?
KZ EDX Ultra Infos
Compare KZ EDX Ultra to popular alternatives
Compare two IEMs side by side
Name
VS
Name
| IEM | alt. Score |
|---|---|
|
KZ EDX Ultra vs. 7hz Zero 2 x Crinacle
7hz Zero 2 x Crinacle offers better mids and dynamics.
|
6.1 |
|
KZ EDX Ultra vs. Tanchjim Bunny
Tanchjim Bunny offers better treble, mids and dynamics.
|
6 |
|
KZ EDX Ultra vs. Moondrop Chu II
Similar overall performance.
|
5.5 |
|
KZ EDX Ultra vs. Final Audio E500
Final Audio E500 offers better treble, imaging and mids.
|
5.5 |
|
KZ EDX Ultra vs. Tanchjim One
Tanchjim One offers better treble, imaging and bass.
|
5.4 |
|
KZ EDX Ultra vs. Tangzu Waner 2
Tangzu Waner 2 offers better treble, mids and dynamics.
|
5.3 |
|
KZ EDX Ultra vs. Kiwi Ears Dolce
Similar overall performance.
|
5.3 |
|
KZ EDX Ultra vs. Moondrop Jiu
Moondrop Jiu offers better treble, mids and bass.
|
5.2 |
|
KZ EDX Ultra vs. TANGZU Waner
TANGZU Waner offers better treble.
|
5.2 |
|
KZ EDX Ultra vs. ND Planet
ND Planet offers better treble, dynamics and mids.
|
5.2 |
Average Technical & Tuning Grades
Average Tunign Grade
C-- Significantly flawed tuning. Noticeable frequency imbalances and unnatural timbre distract from music. Lacks versatility across recordings.
Average Technical Grade
C-- Limited resolution; finer nuances are masked. Soundstage feels narrow, and complex passages cause muddiness. Transitions lack finesse.
Bass
C+
Average bass performance - present but unremarkable. Has reasonable texture but lacks depth and physicality.
Mids
C+
Decent midrange performance - balanced but unremarkable. Adequate clarity for most genres without notable flaws.
Treble
D
Uneven treble response with noticeable peaks and dips. Can sound both dull and occasionally harsh simultaneously.
Dynamics
C-
Average dynamics - passable but unexciting. Transients are rounded and micro-dynamics lack refinement.
Details
C+
Decent detail retrieval. Handles most textures adequately though micro-details and ambient cues could be more pronounced.
Imaging
C-
Average imaging - reasonable localization but lacks specificity. Instruments have general positions but lack pinpoint accuracy.
Gaming
C-
Minimal environmental definition provides only general audio cues. Suitable for games where positioning isn't critical.
User Reviews
Example User
Posted on ...
"This is an example review"
Pros
- Example pro 1
- Example pro 2
Cons
- Example con 1
- Example con 2
No User-Reviews Yet
Share your experience and build your personal ranking list.
You need to be signed in to write your own review