Home
KZ Taurus
Average Reviewer Scores
Average Reviewer Score:
6.2Mixed to Positive
Average User Scores
Average User Score: n/a
Based on 0 user reviews
No user reviews yet. Be the first one who writes a review!

Gaming Score & Grade
- The gaming score is prioritizing technical capabilities of the IEM (Separation, Layering, Soundstage) and good value.
Gaming Score
5.6Gaming Grade
B-KZ Taurus Details
Driver Configuration: 2DD
Tuning Type: n/a
Brand: KZ Top KZ IEMs
Price (Msrp): $25
Support our free service! Buying through our affiliate links costs you nothing extra:
Reviews
Reviewed by: Jaytiss
2025-08-28Reviewed by: Head-Fi.org
6 community members have rated the KZ Taurus at an average of 3.5/5 on Head-Fi. Overall sentiment: Generally Favorable.
Tools
IEM Finder Quiz
new
Use this quiz and answer a few questions to get your individual IEM recommendation list
(1/2) How much are you willing to spend on the IEM?
(2/2) Which sound characteristics are particularly important to you?
KZ Taurus Infos
Compare KZ Taurus to popular alternatives
Take this comparison with a grain of salt—we don't have enough KZ Taurus reviews saved yet to provide an unbiased result.
Compare two IEMs side by side
Name
VS
Name
IEM | alt. Score |
---|---|
KZ Taurus vs. 7Hz Elua Ultra
7Hz Elua Ultra offers better dynamics, soundstage and mids.
|
6.6 |
KZ Taurus vs. LETSHUOER D02
LETSHUOER D02 offers better soundstage, treble and dynamics.
|
6.5 |
KZ Taurus vs. Moondrop Crescent
Similar overall performance.
|
6.3 |
KZ Taurus vs. 7hz Zero 2 x Crinacle
7hz Zero 2 x Crinacle offers better mids, soundstage and dynamics.
|
6.2 |
KZ Taurus vs. Tanchjim Bunny
Tanchjim Bunny offers better soundstage, mids and dynamics.
|
6.1 |
KZ Taurus vs. NiceHCK DB2
NiceHCK DB2 offers better soundstage and dynamics.
|
5.9 |
KZ Taurus vs. Ziigaat Nuo
Ziigaat Nuo offers better soundstage.
|
5.8 |
KZ Taurus vs. Tanchjim One
Tanchjim One offers better soundstage.
|
5.8 |
KZ Taurus vs. Kinera Celest Wyvern Black
Similar overall performance.
|
5.8 |
KZ Taurus vs. EPZ Q1 PRO
Similar overall performance.
|
5.8 |
Average Technical & Tuning Grades
Average Tunign Grade
C- The tuning lacks refinement, jumping between dull and shouty without settling. Vocals frequently sound off-kilter.
Average Technical Grade
B- Technical ability is serviceable, keeping basic detail intact across simpler tracks. It keeps up with acoustic tracks without much fuss.
Mids
C+
The mids are solid and dependable, though not especially remarkable. Vocals stay reasonably grounded in the mix.
Treble
B
Highs sound lively and extended while remaining controlled. Detail retrieval keeps shimmer intact.
Dynamics
C-
Dynamics are average—competent yet lacking real excitement. It keeps music listenable but uninspiring.
Soundstage
C+
The image breathes a little, spacing instruments laterally while sketching a light sense of distance. Separation improves with cleaner recordings.
Gaming
B-
Moderate spatial presentation conveys general directionality. Suitable for casual play where precision isn't critical.
User Reviews
Example User
Posted on ...
"This is an example review"
Pros
- Example pro 1
- Example pro 2
Cons
- Example con 1
- Example con 2
No User-Reviews Yet
Share your experience and build your personal ranking list.
You need to be signed in to write your own review