TangZu Wan'er S.G [3.7/10]
Reviews (2), scores and comparisons for TangZu Wan'er S.G
IEMRanking.com
Home
TangZu Wan'er S.G
Average Reviewer Scores
Average Reviewer Score:
3.7Poor
Average User Scores
Average User Score: n/a
Based on 0 user reviews
No user reviews yet. Be the first one who writes a review!
Gaming Score & Grade
- The gaming score is prioritizing technical capabilities of the IEM (Separation, Layering, Soundstage) and good value.
Gaming Score
4.3Gaming Grade
C-TangZu Wan'er S.G Details
Driver Configuration: 1DD
Tuning Type: n/a
Brand: TangZu Top TangZu IEMs
Price (Msrp): $21
Support our free service! Buying through our affiliate links costs you nothing extra:
Reviews
Reviewed by: Jays Audio
4
Reviewer Score
B+
Tuning
C+
Tech
Reviewed by: Nymz
3.4
Reviewer Score
D+
Tuning
D
Tech
Solid tuning that could use more extension in the upper region, but a very solid pick for its price.
Bass: C-
Mids: C-
Treble: D
Details: D
Imaging: D
Tools
IEM Finder Quiz
new
Use this quiz and answer a few questions to get your individual IEM recommendation list
(1/2) How much are you willing to spend on the IEM?
(2/2) Which sound characteristics are particularly important to you?
TangZu Wan'er S.G Infos
Compare TangZu Wan'er S.G to popular alternatives
Compare two IEMs side by side
Name
VS
Name
| IEM | alt. Score |
|---|---|
|
TangZu Wan'er S.G vs. 7hz Zero 2 x Crinacle
7hz Zero 2 x Crinacle offers better mids.
|
6.1 |
|
TangZu Wan'er S.G vs. Tanchjim Bunny
Tanchjim Bunny offers better mids and treble.
|
6 |
|
TangZu Wan'er S.G vs. Moondrop Chu II
Similar overall performance.
|
5.5 |
|
TangZu Wan'er S.G vs. Final Audio E500
Final Audio E500 offers better imaging, details and treble.
|
5.5 |
|
TangZu Wan'er S.G vs. Tanchjim One
Tanchjim One offers better imaging, details and treble.
|
5.4 |
|
TangZu Wan'er S.G vs. Tangzu Waner 2
Tangzu Waner 2 offers better mids and treble.
|
5.3 |
|
TangZu Wan'er S.G vs. Kiwi Ears Dolce
Kiwi Ears Dolce offers better mids.
|
5.3 |
|
TangZu Wan'er S.G vs. Moondrop Jiu
Moondrop Jiu offers better treble, mids and bass.
|
5.2 |
|
TangZu Wan'er S.G vs. TANGZU Waner
TANGZU Waner offers better mids and treble.
|
5.2 |
|
TangZu Wan'er S.G vs. ND Planet
ND Planet offers better mids and treble.
|
5.2 |
Average Technical & Tuning Grades
Average Tunign Grade
C+- Generally enjoyable tonal character with some noticeable unevenness. Maintains listenability while showing room for refinement in frequency balance.
Average Technical Grade
C-- Limited resolution; finer nuances are masked. Soundstage feels narrow, and complex passages cause muddiness. Transitions lack finesse.
Bass
C-
Subdued bass response that stays mostly in the background. Lacks energy and impact but maintains basic definition.
Mids
C-
Midrange is passable but unrefined. Lacks detail and smoothness, with occasional harshness in upper mids.
Treble
D
Uneven treble response with noticeable peaks and dips. Can sound both dull and occasionally harsh simultaneously.
Details
D
Modest detail presentation with significant loss of texture. Nuances are masked and complex passages become congested.
Imaging
D
Modest imaging with basic left/right positioning. Lacks precision for center placement and suffers from positional blurring.
Gaming
C-
Minimal environmental definition provides only general audio cues. Suitable for games where positioning isn't critical.
User Reviews
Example User
Posted on ...
"This is an example review"
Pros
- Example pro 1
- Example pro 2
Cons
- Example con 1
- Example con 2
No User-Reviews Yet
Share your experience and build your personal ranking list.
You need to be signed in to write your own review