Apevoix Grit - Reviews & Ratings

6 Reviews (B Tier | 6.5/10)

Home Apevoix Grit

Summary

Based on 6 reviews, the Apevoix Grit is a positive pick among reviewers, who feel it delivers a well-rounded experience.

Average Reviewer Scores

Average Reviewer Score:

6.5

Cautiously Favorable

Average User Scores

Average User Score: n/a

Based on 0 user reviews

No user reviews yet. Be the first one who writes a review!

Gaming Score & Grade

  • The gaming score is prioritizing technical capabilities of the IEM (Separation, Layering, Soundstage) and good value.

Gaming Score

7.5

Gaming Grade

A

Reviews

Reviewed by: Z-Reviews

Z-Reviews 7.5 * score rescaled + normalized

Reviewed by: Paul Wasabii

Paul Wasabii 7 * Score computed by IEMRanking.com
A Tuning
B Tech
Vocal-focused tribrid with polite treble and a subtle bone-conduction effect; enjoyable tuning but not the most technical around $200. Keep volume moderate to retain natural timbre. Well-judged vocal-centric tuning with restrained treble and fast, tidy bass. Average technicalities and stage projection; bone conduction effect is subtle and can sound less natural at higher volumes.
Youtube Video Summary

The Apevoix Grit presents a $200 tribrid recipe (1DD + 4BA + bone conduction) inside a semi-smoked carbon-fiber shell and leans toward a safe, neutral-ish balance. Sub-bass is trimmed, mid-bass gets a light lift, and the curve sits a touch under a Harman-like rise, keeping brightness in check. As a package it sounds nice and enjoyable, knocking on the door of the competitive $200 hybrid pack without chasing maximum sparkle or air.

The bone conduction implementation is subtle on this tuning; with four armatures already filling the mids, its effect tends to blend rather than spotlight vocals. At higher volumes the BC contribution can step out and timbre becomes less natural, and insertion can bring minor pressure build-up and the usual BC oddities when tapping the shell. Kept at moderate levels, the presentation stays coherent and smoother.

Bass is quick and tidy, prioritizing cleanliness over slam, which suits the Grit's vocal emphasis. Midrange shows thoughtful finesse: slight mid-bass body for males, a restrained climb into ear-gain, and energy placed before and after to avoid shout. Treble dips around ~5 kHz and rolls earlier up top, keeping most cymbal glare below the vocals; this favors treble-sensitive listeners but trades away air and micro-detail. Stage does not feel small, yet projection is modest for the class, reinforcing the verdict: a tastefully tuned vocal hybrid that values comfort over raw technical fireworks.

Bass: B+ Mids: A- Treble: B Soundstage: B Details: B

Paul Wasabii original ranking

Paul Wasabii Youtube Channel

Reviewed by: Fresh Reviews

Fresh Reviews 7* * The score of this reviewer influences only the Gaming Score

Reviewed by: Jays Audio

Jays Audio 6 Reviewer Score
A Tuning
B+ Tech
A better tuned Anvil, but BCD doesn't do much, bassy all-rounder sound

Jays Audio original ranking

Jays Audio Youtube Channel

Reviewed by: Audio Amigo

Audio Amigo 4 * score rescaled + normalized
Bassy, yet vocal forward tuning with subdued treble. Bone Conduction is more subtle, while still having the tonal affectation and buzzy, springy sounds of other, cheaper BC IEMs. Accessories are dissapointing.

Audio Amigo original ranking

Audio Amigo Youtube Channel

Reviewed by: Head-Fi.org

Head-Fi.org 8.1 * score rescaled + normalized
10 community members have rated the Apevoix Grit at an average of 4.7/5 on Head-Fi. Overall sentiment: Exceptional.

URL to full Review

Head-Fi.org original ranking

Apevoix Grit Infos

Discuss Apevoix Grit with the community

Start an official forum discussion for this IEM. We'll create a new thread titled "Apevoix Grit discussion thread" in our IEM Discussion Threads.

Compare Apevoix Grit to popular alternatives

Compare two IEMs side by side
Name

VS

Name
IEM alt. Score
Apevoix Grit vs. Aful Performer 5+2
Aful Performer 5+2 offers better soundstage, details and bass.
7.7
Apevoix Grit vs. Ziigaat Odyssey
Ziigaat Odyssey offers better soundstage, treble and details.
7.7
Apevoix Grit vs. Simgot ET142
Simgot ET142 offers better details, treble and bass.
7.5
Apevoix Grit vs. MYER SL224
MYER SL224 offers better details, bass and soundstage.
7.5
Apevoix Grit vs. Gizaudio x Binary Chopin
Gizaudio x Binary Chopin offers better details, soundstage and bass.
7.5
Apevoix Grit vs. ZiiGaat Arete x Fresh Reviews
ZiiGaat Arete x Fresh Reviews offers better soundstage.
7.4
Apevoix Grit vs. Crinear Meta
Crinear Meta offers better soundstage, treble and details.
7.4
Apevoix Grit vs. Binary Dynaquattro
Binary Dynaquattro offers better soundstage.
7.4
Apevoix Grit vs. Letshuoer Cadenza 4
Letshuoer Cadenza 4 offers better details, soundstage and treble.
7.3
Apevoix Grit vs. Hidizs MP145
Hidizs MP145 offers better details, soundstage and bass.
7.3
Best IEMs from $200 - $400

IEM Finder Quiz

new
Use this quiz and answer a few questions to get your individual IEM recommendation list
(1/3) How much are you willing to spend on the IEM?
(2/3) Which sound characteristics are particularly important to you?
(3/3) Which tuning do you prefer?
You can select multiple options.

Average Technical & Tuning Grades

Average Tunign Grade

A
  • It presents a smooth, well-integrated tonal balance that plays nicely with many styles. It maintains natural timbre across the range.

Average Technical Grade

B
  • The presentation is steady if unspectacular, holding onto essential details when the music stays simple. Fine details occasionally slip through the cracks.
Bass B+
You get a lively bass response that balances energy with discipline. It balances punch with respectable control.
Mids A-
The mids sound lush and articulate, capturing emotion effortlessly. Strings and keys shimmer with realism.
Treble B
Treble is articulate and clean, adding excitement without harshness. It adds sparkle without harshness.
Soundstage B
Good soundstage with proper width and depth, placing instruments in clearly defined positions. Instruments sit in their own lanes.
Details B
Recordings feel well sorted, with supporting details snapping to attention. Small articulations remain intact.
Gaming A
Clear spatial presentation handles directional cues effectively. Distinguishes key gameplay sounds while maintaining decent immersion.

User Reviews

Example User Posted on ...
0.0

"This is an example review"

Pros
  • Example pro 1
  • Example pro 2
Cons
  • Example con 1
  • Example con 2
No User-Reviews Yet

Share your experience and build your personal ranking list.

Footer