IEMRanking.com
Home
Audeze Euclid
Average Reviewer Scores
Average Reviewer Score:
5.9Mixed
Average User Scores
Average User Score: n/a
Based on 0 user reviews
No user reviews yet. Be the first one who writes a review!

Gaming Score & Grade
- The gaming score is prioritizing technical capabilities of the IEM (Separation, Layering, Soundstage) and good value.
Gaming Score
5.7Gaming Grade
B-Audeze Euclid Details
Driver Configuration:
Tuning Type: Mild V-shape
Price (Msrp): $1,300
Support our free service! Buying through our affiliate links costs you nothing extra:
Reviews
Reviewed by: Crin
Certainly far better tuned than its predecessors with the same excellent technicalities.
Crin Youtube Channel
Crin Youtube Channel
Reviewed by: Precogvision
Very detailed, but treble rolls-off which makes it hard to tell sometimes.
Precogvision Youtube Channel
Precogvision Youtube Channel
Bass: C+
Mids: C+
Treble: C-
Dynamics: C+
Details: A+
Imaging: B
Tools
IEM Finder Quiz
new
Use this quiz and answer a few questions to get your individual IEM recommendation list
(1/2) How much are you willing to spend on the IEM?
(2/2) Which sound characteristics are particularly important to you?
Audeze Euclid Infos
Compare Audeze Euclid to popular alternatives
Compare two IEMs side by side
Name
VS
Name
IEM | alt. Score |
---|---|
Audeze Euclid vs. Fiio FX17
Fiio FX17 offers better treble, dynamics and bass.
|
8.9 |
Audeze Euclid vs. Dunu Glacier
Dunu Glacier offers better treble, dynamics and bass.
|
8.7 |
Audeze Euclid vs. Symphonium x Elise Audio Europa
Symphonium x Elise Audio Europa offers better treble, bass and dynamics.
|
8.5 |
Audeze Euclid vs. ThieAudio Monarch MK4
ThieAudio Monarch MK4 offers better treble, bass and mids.
|
8.4 |
Audeze Euclid vs. Symphonium Crimson
Symphonium Crimson offers better bass, treble and mids.
|
8.4 |
Audeze Euclid vs. Letshuoer Mystic 8
Letshuoer Mystic 8 offers better treble, mids and imaging.
|
8.4 |
Audeze Euclid vs. ThieAudio Prestige LTD
ThieAudio Prestige LTD offers better treble, mids and bass.
|
8.3 |
Audeze Euclid vs. 64 Audio U4s
64 Audio U4s offers better bass, mids and treble.
|
8.2 |
Audeze Euclid vs. Sony IER Z1R
Sony IER Z1R offers better bass, treble and imaging.
|
8.2 |
Audeze Euclid vs. Linsoul x HBB Jupiter
Linsoul x HBB Jupiter offers better dynamics, bass and treble.
|
8.2 |
Average Technical & Tuning Grades
Average Tunign Grade
C+- Generally enjoyable tonal character with some noticeable unevenness. Maintains listenability while showing room for refinement in frequency balance.
Average Technical Grade
A-- Competent technical presentation. Handles separation and detail well in most tracks, with modest soundstage and acceptable imaging capabilities.
Bass
C+
Average bass performance - present but unremarkable. Has reasonable texture but lacks depth and physicality.
Mids
C+
Decent midrange performance - balanced but unremarkable. Adequate clarity for most genres without notable flaws.
Treble
C-
Average treble performance - present but lacking refinement. Some graininess or splashiness affects clarity.
Dynamics
C+
Decent dynamic performance. Good macro-contrast but micro-dynamics could be more nuanced. Satisfactory impact.
Details
A+
Exceptional resolution that uncovers the deepest layers. Retrieves even the most minute details while maintaining natural timbre.
Imaging
B
Good imaging with precise instrument placement. Clear localization within the soundstage including front/back positioning.
Gaming
B-
Moderate spatial presentation conveys general directionality. Suitable for casual play where precision isn't critical. Bad value-to-cost for gaming purpose - not recommended
User Reviews
Example User
Posted on ...
"This is an example review"
Pros
- Example pro 1
- Example pro 2
Cons
- Example con 1
- Example con 2
No User-Reviews Yet
Share your experience and build your personal ranking list.
You need to be signed in to write your own review