IEMRanking.com
Home
Campfire Satsuma
Average Reviewer Scores
Average Reviewer Score:
3.8Poor
Average User Scores
Average User Score: n/a
Based on 0 user reviews
No user reviews yet. Be the first one who writes a review!

Gaming Score & Grade
- The gaming score is prioritizing technical capabilities of the IEM (Separation, Layering, Soundstage) and good value.
Gaming Score
3.8Gaming Grade
D+Campfire Satsuma Details
Driver Configuration: 1BA
Tuning Type: Warm
Brand: Campfire Top Campfire IEMs
Price (Msrp): $200
Support our free service! Buying through our affiliate links costs you nothing extra:
Reviews
Reviewed by: Shuwa-T
Comment: It's a marked improvement over the honeydew at least.
Cramped sounding
Bass: C
Mids: B-
Treble: D+
Soundstage: C+
Details: C+
Imaging: C
Reviewed by: Crin
Reviewed by: Precogvision
Ostensibly rolled-off on both ends of the spectrum, but could be worse...I guess.
Precogvision Youtube Channel
Precogvision Youtube Channel
Bass: D
Mids: E+
Treble: E+
Dynamics: E+
Details: E+
Imaging: E+
Tools
IEM Finder Quiz
new
Use this quiz and answer a few questions to get your individual IEM recommendation list
(1/2) How much are you willing to spend on the IEM?
(2/2) Which sound characteristics are particularly important to you?
Campfire Satsuma Infos
Compare Campfire Satsuma to popular alternatives
Compare two IEMs side by side
Name
VS
Name
IEM | alt. Score |
---|---|
Campfire Satsuma vs. Aful Performer 5+2
Aful Performer 5+2 offers better dynamics, treble and imaging.
|
7.7 |
Campfire Satsuma vs. Ziigaat Odyssey
Ziigaat Odyssey offers better dynamics, mids and treble.
|
7.6 |
Campfire Satsuma vs. Gizaudio x Binary Chopin
Gizaudio x Binary Chopin offers better dynamics, details and imaging.
|
7.6 |
Campfire Satsuma vs. CrinEar Daybreak
CrinEar Daybreak offers better dynamics, imaging and details.
|
7.3 |
Campfire Satsuma vs. DUNU x KOTO ITO
DUNU x KOTO ITO offers better dynamics, bass and imaging.
|
7.3 |
Campfire Satsuma vs. FATfreq x HBB Deuce
FATfreq x HBB Deuce offers better dynamics, bass and mids.
|
7.2 |
Campfire Satsuma vs. EPZ P50
EPZ P50 offers better treble, bass and mids.
|
7 |
Campfire Satsuma vs. BQEYZ Winter
Similar overall performance.
|
7 |
Campfire Satsuma vs. Pula PA02
Pula PA02 offers better treble, bass and mids.
|
7 |
Campfire Satsuma vs. Kiwi Ears KE4
Kiwi Ears KE4 offers better dynamics, treble and mids.
|
6.9 |
Average Technical & Tuning Grades
Average Tunign Grade
D+- Significantly flawed tuning. Noticeable frequency imbalances and unnatural timbre distract from music. Lacks versatility across recordings.
Average Technical Grade
D+- Limited resolution; finer nuances are masked. Soundstage feels narrow, and complex passages cause muddiness. Transitions lack finesse.
Bass
D+
Bass is light and underwhelming. While some faint rumble exists, it lacks punch and authority in any meaningful way.
Mids
D+
Midrange is significantly uneven with coloration. Some frequencies are boosted while others are missing, creating an unnatural tone.
Treble
D-
Treble is noticeably dark and lacking extension. Cymbals lack shimmer and high-frequency details are obscured.
Dynamics
E+
Limited dynamic range with poor micro-detail. Subtle volume changes are lost, and transients lack proper attack.
Soundstage
C+
Decent spatial presentation with noticeable width. Some depth perception but height dimension remains underdeveloped.
Details
D+
Modest detail presentation with significant loss of texture. Nuances are masked and complex passages become congested.
Imaging
D
Modest imaging with basic left/right positioning. Lacks precision for center placement and suffers from positional blurring.
Gaming
D+
Compromised imaging significantly impacts gameplay awareness. Directional cues often lack accuracy or consistency.
User Reviews
Example User
Posted on ...
"This is an example review"
Pros
- Example pro 1
- Example pro 2
Cons
- Example con 1
- Example con 2
No User-Reviews Yet
Share your experience and build your personal ranking list.
You need to be signed in to write your own review