Drop + Grell TWS1X - Reviews & Ratings
1 Review (D Tier | 3.4/10)
IEMRanking.com
Home
Drop + Grell TWS1X
Average Reviewer Scores
Average Reviewer Score:
3.4Very Poor
Average User Scores
Average User Score: n/a
Based on 0 user reviews
No user reviews yet. Be the first one who writes a review!
Gaming Score & Grade
- The gaming score is prioritizing technical capabilities of the IEM (Separation, Layering, Soundstage) and good value.
Gaming Score
3.4Gaming Grade
DDrop + Grell TWS1X Details
Driver Configuration: 1DD
Tuning Type: n/a
Price (Msrp): $200
Support our free service! Buying through our affiliate links costs you nothing extra:
Reviews
Reviewed by: Precogvision
3.4
Reviewer Score
C-
Tuning
D
Tech
w/ all settings OFF. Decent tonality but hampered by compression and worse-than-average technicalities.
Precogvision Youtube Channel
Precogvision Youtube Channel
Bass: C-
Mids: C+
Treble: C-
Dynamics: D
Details: D
Imaging: D
Tools
IEM Finder Quiz
new
Use this quiz and answer a few questions to get your individual IEM recommendation list
(1/2) How much are you willing to spend on the IEM?
(2/2) Which sound characteristics are particularly important to you?
Drop + Grell TWS1X Infos
Compare Drop + Grell TWS1X to popular alternatives
Compare two IEMs side by side
Name
VS
Name
| IEM | alt. Score |
|---|---|
|
Drop + Grell TWS1X vs. Aful Performer 5+2
Aful Performer 5+2 offers better imaging, details and dynamics.
|
7.7 |
|
Drop + Grell TWS1X vs. Ziigaat Odyssey
Ziigaat Odyssey offers better dynamics, bass and mids.
|
7.6 |
|
Drop + Grell TWS1X vs. Gizaudio x Binary Chopin
Gizaudio x Binary Chopin offers better details, dynamics and imaging.
|
7.6 |
|
Drop + Grell TWS1X vs. CrinEar Daybreak
CrinEar Daybreak offers better details, imaging and dynamics.
|
7.3 |
|
Drop + Grell TWS1X vs. DUNU x KOTO ITO
DUNU x KOTO ITO offers better dynamics, imaging and details.
|
7.3 |
|
Drop + Grell TWS1X vs. FATfreq x HBB Deuce
FATfreq x HBB Deuce offers better bass, dynamics and mids.
|
7.2 |
|
Drop + Grell TWS1X vs. EPZ P50
EPZ P50 offers better bass, treble and mids.
|
7 |
|
Drop + Grell TWS1X vs. BQEYZ Winter
Similar overall performance.
|
7 |
|
Drop + Grell TWS1X vs. Kiwi Ears KE4
Kiwi Ears KE4 offers better bass, dynamics and treble.
|
6.9 |
|
Drop + Grell TWS1X vs. 7Hz Timeless 2
7Hz Timeless 2 offers better bass, treble and dynamics.
|
6.9 |
Average Technical & Tuning Grades
Average Tunign Grade
C-- Significantly flawed tuning. Noticeable frequency imbalances and unnatural timbre distract from music. Lacks versatility across recordings.
Average Technical Grade
D- Limited resolution; finer nuances are masked. Soundstage feels narrow, and complex passages cause muddiness. Transitions lack finesse.
Bass
C-
Subdued bass response that stays mostly in the background. Lacks energy and impact but maintains basic definition.
Mids
C+
Decent midrange performance - balanced but unremarkable. Adequate clarity for most genres without notable flaws.
Treble
C-
Average treble performance - present but lacking refinement. Some graininess or splashiness affects clarity.
Dynamics
D
Noticeably compressed dynamics. Musical expression suffers with weak transients and poor contrast between quiet and loud sections.
Details
D
Modest detail presentation with significant loss of texture. Nuances are masked and complex passages become congested.
Imaging
D
Modest imaging with basic left/right positioning. Lacks precision for center placement and suffers from positional blurring.
Gaming
D
Compromised imaging significantly impacts gameplay awareness. Directional cues often lack accuracy or consistency.
User Reviews
Example User
Posted on ...
"This is an example review"
Pros
- Example pro 1
- Example pro 2
Cons
- Example con 1
- Example con 2
No User-Reviews Yet
Share your experience and build your personal ranking list.
You need to be signed in to write your own review