Fat Freq MAESTRO SE [7.5/10]
Reviews (1), scores and comparisons for Fat Freq MAESTRO SE
IEMRanking.com
Home
Fat Freq MAESTRO SE
Average Reviewer Scores
Average Reviewer Score:
7.5Strongly Favorable
Average User Scores
Average User Score: n/a
Based on 0 user reviews
No user reviews yet. Be the first one who writes a review!
Gaming Score & Grade
- The gaming score is prioritizing technical capabilities of the IEM (Separation, Layering, Soundstage) and good value.
Gaming Score
4.7Gaming Grade
CFat Freq MAESTRO SE Details
Driver Configuration: 1DD+7BA+1EST
Tuning Type: Bass
Price (Msrp): $2,000
Support our free service! Buying through our affiliate links costs you nothing extra:
Reviews
Reviewed by: Jaytiss
7.5
Reviewer Score
B+
Tuning
B
Tech
It might be the channel imbalance, but not a fan.
Jaytiss Youtube Channel
Jaytiss Youtube Channel
Mids: B
Treble: B
Dynamics: A-
Soundstage: A-
Tools
IEM Finder Quiz
new
Use this quiz and answer a few questions to get your individual IEM recommendation list
(1/2) How much are you willing to spend on the IEM?
(2/2) Which sound characteristics are particularly important to you?
Fat Freq MAESTRO SE Infos
Compare Fat Freq MAESTRO SE to popular alternatives
Compare two IEMs side by side
Name
VS
Name
| IEM | alt. Score |
|---|---|
|
Fat Freq MAESTRO SE vs. Thieaudio Valhalla
Thieaudio Valhalla offers better mids, treble and soundstage.
|
8.9 |
|
Fat Freq MAESTRO SE vs. Fiio FX17
Fiio FX17 offers better treble, soundstage and mids.
|
8.9 |
|
Fat Freq MAESTRO SE vs. Elysian Apostle
Elysian Apostle offers better mids, treble and soundstage.
|
8.9 |
|
Fat Freq MAESTRO SE vs. Dunu Glacier
Dunu Glacier offers better soundstage, treble and dynamics.
|
8.7 |
|
Fat Freq MAESTRO SE vs. 64 Audio U12t
64 Audio U12t offers better mids, treble and soundstage.
|
8.5 |
|
Fat Freq MAESTRO SE vs. 64 Audio Tia Trio
64 Audio Tia Trio offers better dynamics, mids and treble.
|
8.5 |
|
Fat Freq MAESTRO SE vs. Symphonium x Elise Audio Europa
Symphonium x Elise Audio Europa offers better treble, mids and soundstage.
|
8.5 |
|
Fat Freq MAESTRO SE vs. Symphonium Crimson
Symphonium Crimson offers better mids, treble and soundstage.
|
8.4 |
|
Fat Freq MAESTRO SE vs. 64 Audio Volur
64 Audio Volur offers better treble.
|
8.4 |
|
Fat Freq MAESTRO SE vs. Letshuoer Cadenza 12
Letshuoer Cadenza 12 offers better soundstage, treble and mids.
|
8.2 |
Average Technical & Tuning Grades
Average Tunign Grade
B+- Generally enjoyable tonal character with some noticeable unevenness. Maintains listenability while showing room for refinement in frequency balance.
Average Technical Grade
B- Satisfactory technical performance. Handles basic detail retrieval adequately in most tracks. Maintains reasonable cohesion in simpler arrangements.
Mids
B
Good midrange presence with solid clarity. Vocals are clear and instruments have reasonable texture and body.
Treble
B
Good treble response - clear and detailed without fatigue. Well-extended with proper air and sparkle.
Dynamics
A-
Excellent dynamics with great contrast and speed. Transients are crisp and micro-details are clearly articulated.
Soundstage
A-
Excellent spatial presentation - wide, deep and tall. Precise instrument placement with clear separation in all dimensions.
Gaming
C
Minimal environmental definition provides only general audio cues. Suitable for games where positioning isn't critical. Bad value-to-cost for gaming purpose - not recommended
User Reviews
Example User
Posted on ...
"This is an example review"
Pros
- Example pro 1
- Example pro 2
Cons
- Example con 1
- Example con 2
No User-Reviews Yet
Share your experience and build your personal ranking list.
You need to be signed in to write your own review