Fatfreq Maestro Mini [6.2/10]
Reviews (6), scores and comparisons for Fatfreq Maestro Mini
IEMRanking.com
Home
Fatfreq Maestro Mini
Average Reviewer Scores
Average Reviewer Score:
6.2Mixed to Positive
Average User Scores
Average User Score: n/a
Based on 0 user reviews
No user reviews yet. Be the first one who writes a review!
Gaming Score & Grade
- The gaming score is prioritizing technical capabilities of the IEM (Separation, Layering, Soundstage) and good value.
Gaming Score
6Gaming Grade
BFatfreq Maestro Mini Details
Driver Configuration: 1DD+2BA
Tuning Type: Neutral with bass boost
Price (Msrp): $450
Support our free service! Buying through our affiliate links costs you nothing extra:
Reviews
7.5
* score normalized
6.5
Reviewer Score
A+
Tuning
B
Tech
check links for more info: Crin Youtube Channel
6.2
Reviewer Score
A-
Tuning
B-
Tech
Extreme basshead's dream. Incredible sub-bass shelf while maintaining midrange and treble balance. Precogvision Youtube Channel
Bass: A+
Mids: B
Treble: A-
Dynamics: B
Details: C+
Imaging: B
6
Reviewer Score
A
Tuning
B+
Tech
A basshead set that's actually well-balanced for the most part. Extension on uppermids/highs are good but can get shouty, sub-bass texture and slam is impactful and satisfying - this is the set for most bassheads who don't want a crap ton of bass but still a good amount. Deuce better. Jays Audio Youtube Channel
5.5
Reviewer Score
B-
Tuning
A-
Tech
Bass cannon with correct vocals and treble balance Semi thin vocals Tim Tuned Youtube Channel
Bass: A+
Mids: A-
Treble: A-
5.3
Reviewer Score
C+
Tuning
C+
Tech
F*** you, bass. Default rec for bassheads.
Bass: B
Mids: C+
Treble: C+
Details: C+
Imaging: C+
Tools
IEM Finder Quiz
new
Use this quiz and answer a few questions to get your individual IEM recommendation list
(1/2) How much are you willing to spend on the IEM?
(2/2) Which sound characteristics are particularly important to you?
Fatfreq Maestro Mini Infos
Compare Fatfreq Maestro Mini to popular alternatives
Compare two IEMs side by side
Name
VS
Name
| IEM | alt. Score |
|---|---|
|
Fatfreq Maestro Mini vs. NiceHCK Rockies
Offers better mids, details and imaging.
|
8.1 |
|
Fatfreq Maestro Mini vs. Xenns Top Pro
Offers better details, imaging and mids.
|
7.9 |
|
Fatfreq Maestro Mini vs. ZiiGaat Luna
Offers better mids, treble and dynamics.
|
7.9 |
|
Fatfreq Maestro Mini vs. Moondrop x Crinacle Dusk
Offers better details, imaging and treble.
|
7.7 |
|
Fatfreq Maestro Mini vs. HiSenior Cano Cristales
Offers better dynamics and treble.
|
7.5 |
|
Fatfreq Maestro Mini vs. Ziigaat Arcanis
Offers better mids, dynamics and treble.
|
7.5 |
|
Fatfreq Maestro Mini vs. Yanyin Canon II
Similar overall performance.
|
7.5 |
|
Fatfreq Maestro Mini vs. Kiwi Ears x HBB Punch
Offers better dynamics, bass and treble.
|
7.4 |
|
Fatfreq Maestro Mini vs. Softears Studio 4
Offers better mids and treble.
|
7.4 |
|
Fatfreq Maestro Mini vs. Dunu DK-3001 BD
Offers better details, mids and treble.
|
7.4 |
Average Technical & Tuning Grades
Average Tunign Grade
B+- Generally enjoyable tonal character with some noticeable unevenness. Maintains listenability while showing room for refinement in frequency balance.
Average Technical Grade
B- Satisfactory technical performance. Handles basic detail retrieval adequately in most tracks. Maintains reasonable cohesion in simpler arrangements.
Bass
A-
Strong, well-defined bass with good texture. Delivers satisfying punch and rumble without overwhelming other frequencies.
Mids
B
Good midrange presence with solid clarity. Vocals are clear and instruments have reasonable texture and body.
Treble
B
Good treble response - clear and detailed without fatigue. Well-extended with proper air and sparkle.
Dynamics
B
Good dynamic expression with solid impact. Handles volume contrasts well while maintaining good transient snap.
Details
C+
Decent detail retrieval. Handles most textures adequately though micro-details and ambient cues could be more pronounced.
Imaging
B-
Decent positional accuracy. Good left/right placement with acceptable center image, though depth positioning is approximate.
Gaming
B
Decent spatial awareness for fundamental positioning. Creates satisfying atmosphere in story-driven games while handling basic directional cues. Value-to-cost may not be optimal for gaming-focused users.
User Reviews
Example User
Posted on ...
"This is an example review"
Pros
- Example pro 1
- Example pro 2
Cons
- Example con 1
- Example con 2
No User-Reviews Yet
Share your experience and build your personal ranking list.
You need to be signed in to write your own review